Cargando…

Linking Survey and Administrative Data to Measure Income, Inequality, and Mobility

BACKGROUND: Income is one of the most important measures of well-being, but it is notoriously difficult to measure accurately. In the United States, income data are available from surveys, tax records, and government programs, but each of these sources has important strengths and major limitations w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medalia, Carla, Meyer, Bruce D, O’Hara, Amy B, Wu, Derek
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Swansea University 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095529
http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.939
_version_ 1783696656925982720
author Medalia, Carla
Meyer, Bruce D
O’Hara, Amy B
Wu, Derek
author_facet Medalia, Carla
Meyer, Bruce D
O’Hara, Amy B
Wu, Derek
author_sort Medalia, Carla
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Income is one of the most important measures of well-being, but it is notoriously difficult to measure accurately. In the United States, income data are available from surveys, tax records, and government programs, but each of these sources has important strengths and major limitations when used alone. OBJECTIVES: We link multiple data sources to develop the Comprehensive Income Dataset (CID), a prototype for a restricted micro-level dataset that combines the demographic detail of survey data with the accuracy of administrative measures. METHODS: By incorporating information on nearly all taxable income, tax credits, and cash and in-kind government transfers, the CID surpasses previous efforts to provide an accurate and comprehensive measure of income for the population of United States individuals, families, and households. We also evaluate the accuracy of different income sources and imputation methods. CONCLUSIONS: While still in development, we envision the CID enhancing Census Bureau surveys and statistics by investigating measurement error, improving imputation methods, and augmenting surveys with the best possible estimates of income. It can also be used for policy related research, such as forecasting and simulating changes in programs and taxes. Finally, the CID has substantial advantages over other sources to analyze numerous research topics, including poverty, inequality, mobility, and the distributional consequences of government transfers and taxes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142965
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher Swansea University
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81429652021-06-04 Linking Survey and Administrative Data to Measure Income, Inequality, and Mobility Medalia, Carla Meyer, Bruce D O’Hara, Amy B Wu, Derek Int J Popul Data Sci Population Data Science BACKGROUND: Income is one of the most important measures of well-being, but it is notoriously difficult to measure accurately. In the United States, income data are available from surveys, tax records, and government programs, but each of these sources has important strengths and major limitations when used alone. OBJECTIVES: We link multiple data sources to develop the Comprehensive Income Dataset (CID), a prototype for a restricted micro-level dataset that combines the demographic detail of survey data with the accuracy of administrative measures. METHODS: By incorporating information on nearly all taxable income, tax credits, and cash and in-kind government transfers, the CID surpasses previous efforts to provide an accurate and comprehensive measure of income for the population of United States individuals, families, and households. We also evaluate the accuracy of different income sources and imputation methods. CONCLUSIONS: While still in development, we envision the CID enhancing Census Bureau surveys and statistics by investigating measurement error, improving imputation methods, and augmenting surveys with the best possible estimates of income. It can also be used for policy related research, such as forecasting and simulating changes in programs and taxes. Finally, the CID has substantial advantages over other sources to analyze numerous research topics, including poverty, inequality, mobility, and the distributional consequences of government transfers and taxes. Swansea University 2019-01-31 /pmc/articles/PMC8142965/ /pubmed/34095529 http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.939 Text en https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
spellingShingle Population Data Science
Medalia, Carla
Meyer, Bruce D
O’Hara, Amy B
Wu, Derek
Linking Survey and Administrative Data to Measure Income, Inequality, and Mobility
title Linking Survey and Administrative Data to Measure Income, Inequality, and Mobility
title_full Linking Survey and Administrative Data to Measure Income, Inequality, and Mobility
title_fullStr Linking Survey and Administrative Data to Measure Income, Inequality, and Mobility
title_full_unstemmed Linking Survey and Administrative Data to Measure Income, Inequality, and Mobility
title_short Linking Survey and Administrative Data to Measure Income, Inequality, and Mobility
title_sort linking survey and administrative data to measure income, inequality, and mobility
topic Population Data Science
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142965/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34095529
http://dx.doi.org/10.23889/ijpds.v4i1.939
work_keys_str_mv AT medaliacarla linkingsurveyandadministrativedatatomeasureincomeinequalityandmobility
AT meyerbruced linkingsurveyandadministrativedatatomeasureincomeinequalityandmobility
AT oharaamyb linkingsurveyandadministrativedatatomeasureincomeinequalityandmobility
AT wuderek linkingsurveyandadministrativedatatomeasureincomeinequalityandmobility