Cargando…

“Who Doesn’t Like Receiving Good News?” Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail

As genomic sequencing expands to screen larger numbers of individuals, offering genetic counseling to everyone may not be possible. One approach to managing this limitation is for a genetic counselor to communicate clinically actionable results in person or by telephone, but report other results by...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Beck, Annika T., Sutton, Erica J., Chow, Carolyn P. Y., Curtis, Susan H., Kullo, Iftikhar J., Sharp, Richard R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050322
_version_ 1783696658133942272
author Beck, Annika T.
Sutton, Erica J.
Chow, Carolyn P. Y.
Curtis, Susan H.
Kullo, Iftikhar J.
Sharp, Richard R.
author_facet Beck, Annika T.
Sutton, Erica J.
Chow, Carolyn P. Y.
Curtis, Susan H.
Kullo, Iftikhar J.
Sharp, Richard R.
author_sort Beck, Annika T.
collection PubMed
description As genomic sequencing expands to screen larger numbers of individuals, offering genetic counseling to everyone may not be possible. One approach to managing this limitation is for a genetic counselor to communicate clinically actionable results in person or by telephone, but report other results by mail. We employed this approach in a large genomic implementation study. In this paper, we describe participants’ experiences receiving genomic screening results by mail. We conducted 50 semi-structured telephone interviews with individuals who received neutral genomic screening results by mail. Most participants were satisfied receiving neutral results by mail. Participants generally had a good understanding of results; however, a few participants had misunderstandings about their genomic screening results, including mistaken beliefs about their disease risk and the comprehensiveness of the test. No one reported plans to alter health behaviors, defer medical evaluations, or take other actions that might be considered medically problematic. Reporting neutral results by mail is unlikely to cause recipients distress or generate misunderstandings that may result in reduced vigilance in following recommended preventive health strategies. Nonetheless, some individuals may benefit from additional genetic counseling support to help situate their results in the context of personal concerns and illness experiences.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142970
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81429702021-05-25 “Who Doesn’t Like Receiving Good News?” Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail Beck, Annika T. Sutton, Erica J. Chow, Carolyn P. Y. Curtis, Susan H. Kullo, Iftikhar J. Sharp, Richard R. J Pers Med Article As genomic sequencing expands to screen larger numbers of individuals, offering genetic counseling to everyone may not be possible. One approach to managing this limitation is for a genetic counselor to communicate clinically actionable results in person or by telephone, but report other results by mail. We employed this approach in a large genomic implementation study. In this paper, we describe participants’ experiences receiving genomic screening results by mail. We conducted 50 semi-structured telephone interviews with individuals who received neutral genomic screening results by mail. Most participants were satisfied receiving neutral results by mail. Participants generally had a good understanding of results; however, a few participants had misunderstandings about their genomic screening results, including mistaken beliefs about their disease risk and the comprehensiveness of the test. No one reported plans to alter health behaviors, defer medical evaluations, or take other actions that might be considered medically problematic. Reporting neutral results by mail is unlikely to cause recipients distress or generate misunderstandings that may result in reduced vigilance in following recommended preventive health strategies. Nonetheless, some individuals may benefit from additional genetic counseling support to help situate their results in the context of personal concerns and illness experiences. MDPI 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8142970/ /pubmed/33919001 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050322 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Beck, Annika T.
Sutton, Erica J.
Chow, Carolyn P. Y.
Curtis, Susan H.
Kullo, Iftikhar J.
Sharp, Richard R.
“Who Doesn’t Like Receiving Good News?” Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail
title “Who Doesn’t Like Receiving Good News?” Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail
title_full “Who Doesn’t Like Receiving Good News?” Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail
title_fullStr “Who Doesn’t Like Receiving Good News?” Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail
title_full_unstemmed “Who Doesn’t Like Receiving Good News?” Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail
title_short “Who Doesn’t Like Receiving Good News?” Perspectives of Individuals Who Received Genomic Screening Results by Mail
title_sort “who doesn’t like receiving good news?” perspectives of individuals who received genomic screening results by mail
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142970/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919001
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050322
work_keys_str_mv AT beckannikat whodoesntlikereceivinggoodnewsperspectivesofindividualswhoreceivedgenomicscreeningresultsbymail
AT suttonericaj whodoesntlikereceivinggoodnewsperspectivesofindividualswhoreceivedgenomicscreeningresultsbymail
AT chowcarolynpy whodoesntlikereceivinggoodnewsperspectivesofindividualswhoreceivedgenomicscreeningresultsbymail
AT curtissusanh whodoesntlikereceivinggoodnewsperspectivesofindividualswhoreceivedgenomicscreeningresultsbymail
AT kulloiftikharj whodoesntlikereceivinggoodnewsperspectivesofindividualswhoreceivedgenomicscreeningresultsbymail
AT sharprichardr whodoesntlikereceivinggoodnewsperspectivesofindividualswhoreceivedgenomicscreeningresultsbymail