Cargando…
Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis
Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050472 |
_version_ | 1783696659417399296 |
---|---|
author | Fernández Fernández, Elena Joyce, Mary O’Sullivan, Andrew MacLoughlin, Ronan |
author_facet | Fernández Fernández, Elena Joyce, Mary O’Sullivan, Andrew MacLoughlin, Ronan |
author_sort | Fernández Fernández, Elena |
collection | PubMed |
description | Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of care using a bench model of adult CF. Droplet size analysis of selected antibiotics was completed in tandem with the delivered aerosol dose (% of total dose) assessments in simulations of various interventions providing oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. Results highlight the variability of aerosolised dose delivery. In the homecare setting, the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) delivered significantly more than the jet nebuliser (JN) (16.15 ± 0.86% versus 6.51 ± 2.15%). In the hospital setting, using VMN only, significant variability was seen across clinical interventions. In the emergency department, VMN plus mouthpiece (no supplemental oxygen) was seen to deliver (29.02 ± 1.41%) versus low flow nasal therapy (10 L per minute (LPM) oxygen) (1.81 ± 0.47%) and high flow nasal therapy (50 LPM oxygen) (3.36 ± 0.34%). In the ward/intensive care unit, non-invasive ventilation recorded 19.02 ± 0.28%, versus 22.64 ± 1.88% of the dose delivered during invasive mechanical ventilation. These results will have application in the design of intervention-appropriate aerosol therapy strategies and will be of use to researchers developing new therapeutics for application in cystic fibrosis and beyond. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8142975 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81429752021-05-25 Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis Fernández Fernández, Elena Joyce, Mary O’Sullivan, Andrew MacLoughlin, Ronan Antibiotics (Basel) Article Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of care using a bench model of adult CF. Droplet size analysis of selected antibiotics was completed in tandem with the delivered aerosol dose (% of total dose) assessments in simulations of various interventions providing oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. Results highlight the variability of aerosolised dose delivery. In the homecare setting, the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) delivered significantly more than the jet nebuliser (JN) (16.15 ± 0.86% versus 6.51 ± 2.15%). In the hospital setting, using VMN only, significant variability was seen across clinical interventions. In the emergency department, VMN plus mouthpiece (no supplemental oxygen) was seen to deliver (29.02 ± 1.41%) versus low flow nasal therapy (10 L per minute (LPM) oxygen) (1.81 ± 0.47%) and high flow nasal therapy (50 LPM oxygen) (3.36 ± 0.34%). In the ward/intensive care unit, non-invasive ventilation recorded 19.02 ± 0.28%, versus 22.64 ± 1.88% of the dose delivered during invasive mechanical ventilation. These results will have application in the design of intervention-appropriate aerosol therapy strategies and will be of use to researchers developing new therapeutics for application in cystic fibrosis and beyond. MDPI 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8142975/ /pubmed/33919035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050472 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Fernández Fernández, Elena Joyce, Mary O’Sullivan, Andrew MacLoughlin, Ronan Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis |
title | Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis |
title_full | Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis |
title_short | Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis |
title_sort | evaluation of aerosol therapy during the escalation of care in a model of adult cystic fibrosis |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142975/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050472 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fernandezfernandezelena evaluationofaerosoltherapyduringtheescalationofcareinamodelofadultcysticfibrosis AT joycemary evaluationofaerosoltherapyduringtheescalationofcareinamodelofadultcysticfibrosis AT osullivanandrew evaluationofaerosoltherapyduringtheescalationofcareinamodelofadultcysticfibrosis AT macloughlinronan evaluationofaerosoltherapyduringtheescalationofcareinamodelofadultcysticfibrosis |