Cargando…

Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis

Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fernández Fernández, Elena, Joyce, Mary, O’Sullivan, Andrew, MacLoughlin, Ronan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050472
_version_ 1783696659417399296
author Fernández Fernández, Elena
Joyce, Mary
O’Sullivan, Andrew
MacLoughlin, Ronan
author_facet Fernández Fernández, Elena
Joyce, Mary
O’Sullivan, Andrew
MacLoughlin, Ronan
author_sort Fernández Fernández, Elena
collection PubMed
description Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of care using a bench model of adult CF. Droplet size analysis of selected antibiotics was completed in tandem with the delivered aerosol dose (% of total dose) assessments in simulations of various interventions providing oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. Results highlight the variability of aerosolised dose delivery. In the homecare setting, the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) delivered significantly more than the jet nebuliser (JN) (16.15 ± 0.86% versus 6.51 ± 2.15%). In the hospital setting, using VMN only, significant variability was seen across clinical interventions. In the emergency department, VMN plus mouthpiece (no supplemental oxygen) was seen to deliver (29.02 ± 1.41%) versus low flow nasal therapy (10 L per minute (LPM) oxygen) (1.81 ± 0.47%) and high flow nasal therapy (50 LPM oxygen) (3.36 ± 0.34%). In the ward/intensive care unit, non-invasive ventilation recorded 19.02 ± 0.28%, versus 22.64 ± 1.88% of the dose delivered during invasive mechanical ventilation. These results will have application in the design of intervention-appropriate aerosol therapy strategies and will be of use to researchers developing new therapeutics for application in cystic fibrosis and beyond.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8142975
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81429752021-05-25 Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis Fernández Fernández, Elena Joyce, Mary O’Sullivan, Andrew MacLoughlin, Ronan Antibiotics (Basel) Article Lung disease is the main cause of morbidity and mortality in cystic fibrosis (CF). CF patients inhale antibiotics regularly as treatment against persistent bacterial infections. The goal of this study was to investigate the effect of clinical intervention on aerosol therapy during the escalation of care using a bench model of adult CF. Droplet size analysis of selected antibiotics was completed in tandem with the delivered aerosol dose (% of total dose) assessments in simulations of various interventions providing oxygen supplementation or ventilatory support. Results highlight the variability of aerosolised dose delivery. In the homecare setting, the vibrating mesh nebuliser (VMN) delivered significantly more than the jet nebuliser (JN) (16.15 ± 0.86% versus 6.51 ± 2.15%). In the hospital setting, using VMN only, significant variability was seen across clinical interventions. In the emergency department, VMN plus mouthpiece (no supplemental oxygen) was seen to deliver (29.02 ± 1.41%) versus low flow nasal therapy (10 L per minute (LPM) oxygen) (1.81 ± 0.47%) and high flow nasal therapy (50 LPM oxygen) (3.36 ± 0.34%). In the ward/intensive care unit, non-invasive ventilation recorded 19.02 ± 0.28%, versus 22.64 ± 1.88% of the dose delivered during invasive mechanical ventilation. These results will have application in the design of intervention-appropriate aerosol therapy strategies and will be of use to researchers developing new therapeutics for application in cystic fibrosis and beyond. MDPI 2021-04-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8142975/ /pubmed/33919035 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050472 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fernández Fernández, Elena
Joyce, Mary
O’Sullivan, Andrew
MacLoughlin, Ronan
Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis
title Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis
title_full Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis
title_fullStr Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis
title_short Evaluation of Aerosol Therapy during the Escalation of Care in a Model of Adult Cystic Fibrosis
title_sort evaluation of aerosol therapy during the escalation of care in a model of adult cystic fibrosis
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8142975/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33919035
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050472
work_keys_str_mv AT fernandezfernandezelena evaluationofaerosoltherapyduringtheescalationofcareinamodelofadultcysticfibrosis
AT joycemary evaluationofaerosoltherapyduringtheescalationofcareinamodelofadultcysticfibrosis
AT osullivanandrew evaluationofaerosoltherapyduringtheescalationofcareinamodelofadultcysticfibrosis
AT macloughlinronan evaluationofaerosoltherapyduringtheescalationofcareinamodelofadultcysticfibrosis