Cargando…

Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review

The distinction between race and ethnicity should be carefully understood and described for demographic data collection. Racial healthcare differences have been observed across many orthopaedic subspecialties. However, the frequency of reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinic...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paul, Ryan W., Lee, Donghoon, Brutico, Joseph, Tjoumakaris, Fotios P., Ciccotti, Michael G., Freedman, Kevin B.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8143759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019498
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00027
_version_ 1783696821419245568
author Paul, Ryan W.
Lee, Donghoon
Brutico, Joseph
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Freedman, Kevin B.
author_facet Paul, Ryan W.
Lee, Donghoon
Brutico, Joseph
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Freedman, Kevin B.
author_sort Paul, Ryan W.
collection PubMed
description The distinction between race and ethnicity should be carefully understood and described for demographic data collection. Racial healthcare differences have been observed across many orthopaedic subspecialties. However, the frequency of reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinical trials has not been determined. Therefore, the primary purpose of this systematic review was to determine how frequently race and ethnicity are reported and analyzed in orthopaedic clinical trials. METHODS: The top 10 journals by impact factor in the field of orthopaedics were manually screened from 2015 to 2019. All randomized controlled trials related to orthopaedics and assessing clinical outcomes were included. Eligible studies were evaluated for bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and for whether the trial reported and analyzed several demographics, including age, sex, height, weight, race, and ethnicity. The frequency of reporting and analyzing by each demographic was accessed. In addition, comparisons of reporting and analyzing race/ethnicity were made based on orthopaedic subspecialty and journal of publication. RESULTS: A total of 15,488 publications were screened and 482 met inclusion criteria. Of these 482 trials, 460 (95.4%) reported age and 456 (94.6%) reported sex, whereas 35 (7.3%) reported race and 15 (3.1%) reported ethnicity for the randomized groups; 79 studies (16.4%) analyzed age and 72 studies (14.9%) analyzed sex, whereas 6 studies (1.2%) analyzed race and 1 study (0.2%) analyzed ethnicity. The orthopaedic subspecialty of spine was found to report race (23.5%) and ethnicity (17.6%) more frequently than all the other subspecialties, whereas sports medicine reported race and/or ethnicity in only 3 of 150 trials (2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity are not frequently reported or analyzed in orthopaedic randomized controlled trials. Social context, personal challenges, and economic challenges should be considered while analyzing the effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8143759
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81437592021-05-26 Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review Paul, Ryan W. Lee, Donghoon Brutico, Joseph Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Ciccotti, Michael G. Freedman, Kevin B. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article The distinction between race and ethnicity should be carefully understood and described for demographic data collection. Racial healthcare differences have been observed across many orthopaedic subspecialties. However, the frequency of reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinical trials has not been determined. Therefore, the primary purpose of this systematic review was to determine how frequently race and ethnicity are reported and analyzed in orthopaedic clinical trials. METHODS: The top 10 journals by impact factor in the field of orthopaedics were manually screened from 2015 to 2019. All randomized controlled trials related to orthopaedics and assessing clinical outcomes were included. Eligible studies were evaluated for bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and for whether the trial reported and analyzed several demographics, including age, sex, height, weight, race, and ethnicity. The frequency of reporting and analyzing by each demographic was accessed. In addition, comparisons of reporting and analyzing race/ethnicity were made based on orthopaedic subspecialty and journal of publication. RESULTS: A total of 15,488 publications were screened and 482 met inclusion criteria. Of these 482 trials, 460 (95.4%) reported age and 456 (94.6%) reported sex, whereas 35 (7.3%) reported race and 15 (3.1%) reported ethnicity for the randomized groups; 79 studies (16.4%) analyzed age and 72 studies (14.9%) analyzed sex, whereas 6 studies (1.2%) analyzed race and 1 study (0.2%) analyzed ethnicity. The orthopaedic subspecialty of spine was found to report race (23.5%) and ethnicity (17.6%) more frequently than all the other subspecialties, whereas sports medicine reported race and/or ethnicity in only 3 of 150 trials (2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity are not frequently reported or analyzed in orthopaedic randomized controlled trials. Social context, personal challenges, and economic challenges should be considered while analyzing the effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes. Wolters Kluwer 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8143759/ /pubmed/34019498 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00027 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paul, Ryan W.
Lee, Donghoon
Brutico, Joseph
Tjoumakaris, Fotios P.
Ciccotti, Michael G.
Freedman, Kevin B.
Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
title Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
title_full Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
title_fullStr Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
title_full_unstemmed Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
title_short Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
title_sort reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinical trials: a systematic review
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8143759/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019498
http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00027
work_keys_str_mv AT paulryanw reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT leedonghoon reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT bruticojoseph reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT tjoumakarisfotiosp reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT ciccottimichaelg reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview
AT freedmankevinb reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview