Cargando…
Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review
The distinction between race and ethnicity should be carefully understood and described for demographic data collection. Racial healthcare differences have been observed across many orthopaedic subspecialties. However, the frequency of reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8143759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019498 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00027 |
_version_ | 1783696821419245568 |
---|---|
author | Paul, Ryan W. Lee, Donghoon Brutico, Joseph Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Ciccotti, Michael G. Freedman, Kevin B. |
author_facet | Paul, Ryan W. Lee, Donghoon Brutico, Joseph Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Ciccotti, Michael G. Freedman, Kevin B. |
author_sort | Paul, Ryan W. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The distinction between race and ethnicity should be carefully understood and described for demographic data collection. Racial healthcare differences have been observed across many orthopaedic subspecialties. However, the frequency of reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinical trials has not been determined. Therefore, the primary purpose of this systematic review was to determine how frequently race and ethnicity are reported and analyzed in orthopaedic clinical trials. METHODS: The top 10 journals by impact factor in the field of orthopaedics were manually screened from 2015 to 2019. All randomized controlled trials related to orthopaedics and assessing clinical outcomes were included. Eligible studies were evaluated for bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and for whether the trial reported and analyzed several demographics, including age, sex, height, weight, race, and ethnicity. The frequency of reporting and analyzing by each demographic was accessed. In addition, comparisons of reporting and analyzing race/ethnicity were made based on orthopaedic subspecialty and journal of publication. RESULTS: A total of 15,488 publications were screened and 482 met inclusion criteria. Of these 482 trials, 460 (95.4%) reported age and 456 (94.6%) reported sex, whereas 35 (7.3%) reported race and 15 (3.1%) reported ethnicity for the randomized groups; 79 studies (16.4%) analyzed age and 72 studies (14.9%) analyzed sex, whereas 6 studies (1.2%) analyzed race and 1 study (0.2%) analyzed ethnicity. The orthopaedic subspecialty of spine was found to report race (23.5%) and ethnicity (17.6%) more frequently than all the other subspecialties, whereas sports medicine reported race and/or ethnicity in only 3 of 150 trials (2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity are not frequently reported or analyzed in orthopaedic randomized controlled trials. Social context, personal challenges, and economic challenges should be considered while analyzing the effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8143759 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81437592021-05-26 Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review Paul, Ryan W. Lee, Donghoon Brutico, Joseph Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Ciccotti, Michael G. Freedman, Kevin B. J Am Acad Orthop Surg Glob Res Rev Research Article The distinction between race and ethnicity should be carefully understood and described for demographic data collection. Racial healthcare differences have been observed across many orthopaedic subspecialties. However, the frequency of reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinical trials has not been determined. Therefore, the primary purpose of this systematic review was to determine how frequently race and ethnicity are reported and analyzed in orthopaedic clinical trials. METHODS: The top 10 journals by impact factor in the field of orthopaedics were manually screened from 2015 to 2019. All randomized controlled trials related to orthopaedics and assessing clinical outcomes were included. Eligible studies were evaluated for bias using the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool and for whether the trial reported and analyzed several demographics, including age, sex, height, weight, race, and ethnicity. The frequency of reporting and analyzing by each demographic was accessed. In addition, comparisons of reporting and analyzing race/ethnicity were made based on orthopaedic subspecialty and journal of publication. RESULTS: A total of 15,488 publications were screened and 482 met inclusion criteria. Of these 482 trials, 460 (95.4%) reported age and 456 (94.6%) reported sex, whereas 35 (7.3%) reported race and 15 (3.1%) reported ethnicity for the randomized groups; 79 studies (16.4%) analyzed age and 72 studies (14.9%) analyzed sex, whereas 6 studies (1.2%) analyzed race and 1 study (0.2%) analyzed ethnicity. The orthopaedic subspecialty of spine was found to report race (23.5%) and ethnicity (17.6%) more frequently than all the other subspecialties, whereas sports medicine reported race and/or ethnicity in only 3 of 150 trials (2.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Race and ethnicity are not frequently reported or analyzed in orthopaedic randomized controlled trials. Social context, personal challenges, and economic challenges should be considered while analyzing the effect of race and ethnicity on outcomes. Wolters Kluwer 2021-05-21 /pmc/articles/PMC8143759/ /pubmed/34019498 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00027 Text en Copyright © 2021 The Authors. Published by Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. on behalf of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License 4.0 (CCBY) (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Paul, Ryan W. Lee, Donghoon Brutico, Joseph Tjoumakaris, Fotios P. Ciccotti, Michael G. Freedman, Kevin B. Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review |
title | Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_full | Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_fullStr | Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_full_unstemmed | Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_short | Reporting and Analyzing Race and Ethnicity in Orthopaedic Clinical Trials: A Systematic Review |
title_sort | reporting and analyzing race and ethnicity in orthopaedic clinical trials: a systematic review |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8143759/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34019498 http://dx.doi.org/10.5435/JAAOSGlobal-D-21-00027 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paulryanw reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview AT leedonghoon reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview AT bruticojoseph reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview AT tjoumakarisfotiosp reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview AT ciccottimichaelg reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview AT freedmankevinb reportingandanalyzingraceandethnicityinorthopaedicclinicaltrialsasystematicreview |