Cargando…

Feasibility, Acceptance, and Safety of Metacognitive Training for Problem and Pathological Gamblers (Gambling-MCT): A Pilot Study

Approximately 90% of problem and pathological gamblers remain untreated. This treatment gap may be diminished by the implementation of low-threshold treatment programs. As cognitive distortions play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of gambling problems, interventions targeting gambl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gehlenborg, Josefine, Bücker, Lara, Berthold, Mira, Miegel, Franziska, Moritz, Steffen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09975-w
_version_ 1783696897370750976
author Gehlenborg, Josefine
Bücker, Lara
Berthold, Mira
Miegel, Franziska
Moritz, Steffen
author_facet Gehlenborg, Josefine
Bücker, Lara
Berthold, Mira
Miegel, Franziska
Moritz, Steffen
author_sort Gehlenborg, Josefine
collection PubMed
description Approximately 90% of problem and pathological gamblers remain untreated. This treatment gap may be diminished by the implementation of low-threshold treatment programs. As cognitive distortions play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of gambling problems, interventions targeting gambling-related biases may be particularly effective. The aim of the present study was to examine the feasibility, acceptance, and safety of a novel metacognitive training for individuals with gambling problems (Gambling-MCT). Twenty-five participants were included in an uncontrolled pilot trial with two assessment points (intervention). The intervention comprised eight training modules targeting gambling-specific cognitive distortions. At baseline and post assessment, symptom severity, as measured with the PG-YBOCS, and gambling-related cognitive distortions, as measured with the GABS, were assessed. In addition, interim assessments measuring session-specific changes were conducted. Subjective appraisal was examined after each module and also post treatment. On average, participants took part in 4.16 (SD = 2.84) training sessions. Both intent-to-treat and per protocol analyses showed significant improvements on the PG-YBOCS and the GABS (d(z) = 0.37–1.37). After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, linear mixed models for the analysis of session-specific changes showed no deterioration in participants’ mental state after any of the modules. Subjective appraisal of Gambling-MCT was good. The present pilot study provides first evidence for the feasibility, acceptance, and safety of Gambling-MCT. Recruitment of participants remains challenging, emphasizing the importance of overcoming patient-related treatment barriers. Future studies need to investigate the efficacy of Gambling-MCT in randomized controlled trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10899-020-09975-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8144133
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81441332021-06-01 Feasibility, Acceptance, and Safety of Metacognitive Training for Problem and Pathological Gamblers (Gambling-MCT): A Pilot Study Gehlenborg, Josefine Bücker, Lara Berthold, Mira Miegel, Franziska Moritz, Steffen J Gambl Stud Original Paper Approximately 90% of problem and pathological gamblers remain untreated. This treatment gap may be diminished by the implementation of low-threshold treatment programs. As cognitive distortions play a crucial role in the development and maintenance of gambling problems, interventions targeting gambling-related biases may be particularly effective. The aim of the present study was to examine the feasibility, acceptance, and safety of a novel metacognitive training for individuals with gambling problems (Gambling-MCT). Twenty-five participants were included in an uncontrolled pilot trial with two assessment points (intervention). The intervention comprised eight training modules targeting gambling-specific cognitive distortions. At baseline and post assessment, symptom severity, as measured with the PG-YBOCS, and gambling-related cognitive distortions, as measured with the GABS, were assessed. In addition, interim assessments measuring session-specific changes were conducted. Subjective appraisal was examined after each module and also post treatment. On average, participants took part in 4.16 (SD = 2.84) training sessions. Both intent-to-treat and per protocol analyses showed significant improvements on the PG-YBOCS and the GABS (d(z) = 0.37–1.37). After Bonferroni correction for multiple testing, linear mixed models for the analysis of session-specific changes showed no deterioration in participants’ mental state after any of the modules. Subjective appraisal of Gambling-MCT was good. The present pilot study provides first evidence for the feasibility, acceptance, and safety of Gambling-MCT. Recruitment of participants remains challenging, emphasizing the importance of overcoming patient-related treatment barriers. Future studies need to investigate the efficacy of Gambling-MCT in randomized controlled trials. ELECTRONIC SUPPLEMENTARY MATERIAL: The online version of this article (10.1007/s10899-020-09975-w) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users. Springer US 2020-09-21 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8144133/ /pubmed/32955694 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09975-w Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Paper
Gehlenborg, Josefine
Bücker, Lara
Berthold, Mira
Miegel, Franziska
Moritz, Steffen
Feasibility, Acceptance, and Safety of Metacognitive Training for Problem and Pathological Gamblers (Gambling-MCT): A Pilot Study
title Feasibility, Acceptance, and Safety of Metacognitive Training for Problem and Pathological Gamblers (Gambling-MCT): A Pilot Study
title_full Feasibility, Acceptance, and Safety of Metacognitive Training for Problem and Pathological Gamblers (Gambling-MCT): A Pilot Study
title_fullStr Feasibility, Acceptance, and Safety of Metacognitive Training for Problem and Pathological Gamblers (Gambling-MCT): A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed Feasibility, Acceptance, and Safety of Metacognitive Training for Problem and Pathological Gamblers (Gambling-MCT): A Pilot Study
title_short Feasibility, Acceptance, and Safety of Metacognitive Training for Problem and Pathological Gamblers (Gambling-MCT): A Pilot Study
title_sort feasibility, acceptance, and safety of metacognitive training for problem and pathological gamblers (gambling-mct): a pilot study
topic Original Paper
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144133/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/32955694
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10899-020-09975-w
work_keys_str_mv AT gehlenborgjosefine feasibilityacceptanceandsafetyofmetacognitivetrainingforproblemandpathologicalgamblersgamblingmctapilotstudy
AT buckerlara feasibilityacceptanceandsafetyofmetacognitivetrainingforproblemandpathologicalgamblersgamblingmctapilotstudy
AT bertholdmira feasibilityacceptanceandsafetyofmetacognitivetrainingforproblemandpathologicalgamblersgamblingmctapilotstudy
AT miegelfranziska feasibilityacceptanceandsafetyofmetacognitivetrainingforproblemandpathologicalgamblersgamblingmctapilotstudy
AT moritzsteffen feasibilityacceptanceandsafetyofmetacognitivetrainingforproblemandpathologicalgamblersgamblingmctapilotstudy