Cargando…

The physiological strain index does not reliably identify individuals at risk of reaching a thermal tolerance limit

PURPOSE: The physiological strain index (PSI) was developed to assess individuals’ heat strain, yet evidence supporting its use to identify individuals at potential risk of reaching a thermal tolerance limit (TTL) is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether PSI can identify individuals a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Davey, Sarah L., Downie, Victoria, Griggs, Katy, Havenith, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144153/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33677693
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00421-021-04642-3
Descripción
Sumario:PURPOSE: The physiological strain index (PSI) was developed to assess individuals’ heat strain, yet evidence supporting its use to identify individuals at potential risk of reaching a thermal tolerance limit (TTL) is limited. The aim of this study was to assess whether PSI can identify individuals at risk of reaching a TTL. METHODS: Fifteen females and 21 males undertook a total of 136 trials, each consisting of two 40–60 minute periods of treadmill walking separated by ~ 15 minutes rest, wearing permeable or impermeable clothing, in a range of climatic conditions. Heart rate (HR), skin temperature (T(sk)), rectal temperature (T(re)), temperature sensation (TS) and thermal comfort (TC) were measured throughout. Various forms of the PSI-index were assessed including the original PSI, PSI(fixed), adaptive-PSI (aPSI) and a version comprised of a measure of heat storage (PSI(HS)). Final physiological and PSI values and their rate of change (ROC) over a trial and in the last 10 minutes of a trial were compared between trials completed (C, 101 trials) and those terminated prematurely (TTL, 35 trials). RESULTS: Final PSI(original), PSI(fixed), aPSI, PSI(HS) did not differ between TTL and C (p > 0.05). However, differences between TTL and C occurred in final T(sk), T(re)–T(sk), TS, TC and ROC in PSI(fixed), T(re), T(sk) and HR (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: These results suggest the PSI, in the various forms, does not reliably identify individuals at imminent risk of reaching their TTL and its validity as a physiological safety index is therefore questionable. However, a physiological-perceptual strain index may provide a more valid measure.