Cargando…

Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis

In an experiment conducted by Kennedy et al. (Exp Brain Res 233:181–195, 2016), dominant right-handed individuals were required to produce a rhythm of isometric forces in a 2:1 or 1:2 bimanual coordination pattern. In the 2:1 pattern, the left limb performed the faster rhythm, while in the 1:2 patte...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Panzer, Stefan, Kennedy, Deanna, Leinen, Peter, Pfeifer, Christina, Shea, Charles
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06082-z
_version_ 1783696903955808256
author Panzer, Stefan
Kennedy, Deanna
Leinen, Peter
Pfeifer, Christina
Shea, Charles
author_facet Panzer, Stefan
Kennedy, Deanna
Leinen, Peter
Pfeifer, Christina
Shea, Charles
author_sort Panzer, Stefan
collection PubMed
description In an experiment conducted by Kennedy et al. (Exp Brain Res 233:181–195, 2016), dominant right-handed individuals were required to produce a rhythm of isometric forces in a 2:1 or 1:2 bimanual coordination pattern. In the 2:1 pattern, the left limb performed the faster rhythm, while in the 1:2 pattern, the right limb produced the faster pattern. In the 1:2 pattern, interference occurred in the limb which had to produce the slower rhythm of forces. However, in the 2:1 condition, interference occurred in both limbs. The conclusion was that interference was not only influenced by movement frequency, but also influenced by limb dominance. The present experiment was designed to replicate these findings in dynamic bimanual 1:2 and 2:1 tasks where performers had to move one wrist faster than the other, and to determine the influence of limb dominance. Dominant left-handed (N = 10; LQ = − 89.81) and dominant right-handed (N = 14; LQ = 91.25) participants were required to perform a 2:1 and a 1:2 coordination pattern using Lissajous feedback. The harmonicity value was calculated to quantify the interference in the trial-time series. The analysis demonstrated that regardless of limb dominance, harmonicity was always lower in the slower moving limb than in the faster moving limb. The present results indicated that for dominant left- and dominant right-handers the faster moving limb influenced the slower moving limb. This is in accordance with the assumption that movement frequency has a higher impact on limb control in bimanual 2:1 and 1:2 coordination tasks than handedness.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8144160
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81441602021-06-01 Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis Panzer, Stefan Kennedy, Deanna Leinen, Peter Pfeifer, Christina Shea, Charles Exp Brain Res Research Article In an experiment conducted by Kennedy et al. (Exp Brain Res 233:181–195, 2016), dominant right-handed individuals were required to produce a rhythm of isometric forces in a 2:1 or 1:2 bimanual coordination pattern. In the 2:1 pattern, the left limb performed the faster rhythm, while in the 1:2 pattern, the right limb produced the faster pattern. In the 1:2 pattern, interference occurred in the limb which had to produce the slower rhythm of forces. However, in the 2:1 condition, interference occurred in both limbs. The conclusion was that interference was not only influenced by movement frequency, but also influenced by limb dominance. The present experiment was designed to replicate these findings in dynamic bimanual 1:2 and 2:1 tasks where performers had to move one wrist faster than the other, and to determine the influence of limb dominance. Dominant left-handed (N = 10; LQ = − 89.81) and dominant right-handed (N = 14; LQ = 91.25) participants were required to perform a 2:1 and a 1:2 coordination pattern using Lissajous feedback. The harmonicity value was calculated to quantify the interference in the trial-time series. The analysis demonstrated that regardless of limb dominance, harmonicity was always lower in the slower moving limb than in the faster moving limb. The present results indicated that for dominant left- and dominant right-handers the faster moving limb influenced the slower moving limb. This is in accordance with the assumption that movement frequency has a higher impact on limb control in bimanual 2:1 and 1:2 coordination tasks than handedness. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-03-22 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8144160/ /pubmed/33748885 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06082-z Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Research Article
Panzer, Stefan
Kennedy, Deanna
Leinen, Peter
Pfeifer, Christina
Shea, Charles
Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis
title Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis
title_full Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis
title_fullStr Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis
title_full_unstemmed Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis
title_short Bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis
title_sort bimanual coordination associated with left- and right-hand dominance: testing the limb assignment and limb dominance hypothesis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144160/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33748885
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00221-021-06082-z
work_keys_str_mv AT panzerstefan bimanualcoordinationassociatedwithleftandrighthanddominancetestingthelimbassignmentandlimbdominancehypothesis
AT kennedydeanna bimanualcoordinationassociatedwithleftandrighthanddominancetestingthelimbassignmentandlimbdominancehypothesis
AT leinenpeter bimanualcoordinationassociatedwithleftandrighthanddominancetestingthelimbassignmentandlimbdominancehypothesis
AT pfeiferchristina bimanualcoordinationassociatedwithleftandrighthanddominancetestingthelimbassignmentandlimbdominancehypothesis
AT sheacharles bimanualcoordinationassociatedwithleftandrighthanddominancetestingthelimbassignmentandlimbdominancehypothesis