Cargando…
Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
Natural sensory environments, despite strong potential for structuring systems, have been neglected in ecological theory. Here, we test the hypothesis that intense natural acoustic environments shape animal distributions and behavior by broadcasting whitewater river noise in montane riparian zones f...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Nature Publishing Group UK
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34031384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22390-y |
_version_ | 1783696995385344000 |
---|---|
author | Gomes, D. G. E. Toth, C. A. Cole, H. J. Francis, C. D. Barber, J. R. |
author_facet | Gomes, D. G. E. Toth, C. A. Cole, H. J. Francis, C. D. Barber, J. R. |
author_sort | Gomes, D. G. E. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Natural sensory environments, despite strong potential for structuring systems, have been neglected in ecological theory. Here, we test the hypothesis that intense natural acoustic environments shape animal distributions and behavior by broadcasting whitewater river noise in montane riparian zones for two summers. Additionally, we use spectrally-altered river noise to explicitly test the effects of masking as a mechanism driving patterns. Using data from abundance and activity surveys across 60 locations, over two full breeding seasons, we find that both birds and bats avoid areas with high sound levels, while birds avoid frequencies that overlap with birdsong, and bats avoid higher frequencies more generally. We place 720 clay caterpillars in willows, and find that intense sound levels decrease foraging behavior in birds. For bats, we deploy foraging tests across 144 nights, consisting of robotic insect-wing mimics, and speakers broadcasting bat prey sounds, and find that bats appear to switch hunting strategies from passive listening to aerial hawking as sound levels increase. Natural acoustic environments are an underappreciated niche axis, a conclusion that serves to escalate the urgency of mitigating human-created noise. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8144611 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Nature Publishing Group UK |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81446112021-06-01 Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche Gomes, D. G. E. Toth, C. A. Cole, H. J. Francis, C. D. Barber, J. R. Nat Commun Article Natural sensory environments, despite strong potential for structuring systems, have been neglected in ecological theory. Here, we test the hypothesis that intense natural acoustic environments shape animal distributions and behavior by broadcasting whitewater river noise in montane riparian zones for two summers. Additionally, we use spectrally-altered river noise to explicitly test the effects of masking as a mechanism driving patterns. Using data from abundance and activity surveys across 60 locations, over two full breeding seasons, we find that both birds and bats avoid areas with high sound levels, while birds avoid frequencies that overlap with birdsong, and bats avoid higher frequencies more generally. We place 720 clay caterpillars in willows, and find that intense sound levels decrease foraging behavior in birds. For bats, we deploy foraging tests across 144 nights, consisting of robotic insect-wing mimics, and speakers broadcasting bat prey sounds, and find that bats appear to switch hunting strategies from passive listening to aerial hawking as sound levels increase. Natural acoustic environments are an underappreciated niche axis, a conclusion that serves to escalate the urgency of mitigating human-created noise. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8144611/ /pubmed/34031384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22390-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Article Gomes, D. G. E. Toth, C. A. Cole, H. J. Francis, C. D. Barber, J. R. Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche |
title | Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche |
title_full | Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche |
title_fullStr | Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche |
title_full_unstemmed | Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche |
title_short | Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche |
title_sort | phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144611/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34031384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22390-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT gomesdge phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche AT tothca phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche AT colehj phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche AT franciscd phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche AT barberjr phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche |