Cargando…

Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche

Natural sensory environments, despite strong potential for structuring systems, have been neglected in ecological theory. Here, we test the hypothesis that intense natural acoustic environments shape animal distributions and behavior by broadcasting whitewater river noise in montane riparian zones f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Gomes, D. G. E., Toth, C. A., Cole, H. J., Francis, C. D., Barber, J. R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34031384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22390-y
_version_ 1783696995385344000
author Gomes, D. G. E.
Toth, C. A.
Cole, H. J.
Francis, C. D.
Barber, J. R.
author_facet Gomes, D. G. E.
Toth, C. A.
Cole, H. J.
Francis, C. D.
Barber, J. R.
author_sort Gomes, D. G. E.
collection PubMed
description Natural sensory environments, despite strong potential for structuring systems, have been neglected in ecological theory. Here, we test the hypothesis that intense natural acoustic environments shape animal distributions and behavior by broadcasting whitewater river noise in montane riparian zones for two summers. Additionally, we use spectrally-altered river noise to explicitly test the effects of masking as a mechanism driving patterns. Using data from abundance and activity surveys across 60 locations, over two full breeding seasons, we find that both birds and bats avoid areas with high sound levels, while birds avoid frequencies that overlap with birdsong, and bats avoid higher frequencies more generally. We place 720 clay caterpillars in willows, and find that intense sound levels decrease foraging behavior in birds. For bats, we deploy foraging tests across 144 nights, consisting of robotic insect-wing mimics, and speakers broadcasting bat prey sounds, and find that bats appear to switch hunting strategies from passive listening to aerial hawking as sound levels increase. Natural acoustic environments are an underappreciated niche axis, a conclusion that serves to escalate the urgency of mitigating human-created noise.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8144611
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81446112021-06-01 Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche Gomes, D. G. E. Toth, C. A. Cole, H. J. Francis, C. D. Barber, J. R. Nat Commun Article Natural sensory environments, despite strong potential for structuring systems, have been neglected in ecological theory. Here, we test the hypothesis that intense natural acoustic environments shape animal distributions and behavior by broadcasting whitewater river noise in montane riparian zones for two summers. Additionally, we use spectrally-altered river noise to explicitly test the effects of masking as a mechanism driving patterns. Using data from abundance and activity surveys across 60 locations, over two full breeding seasons, we find that both birds and bats avoid areas with high sound levels, while birds avoid frequencies that overlap with birdsong, and bats avoid higher frequencies more generally. We place 720 clay caterpillars in willows, and find that intense sound levels decrease foraging behavior in birds. For bats, we deploy foraging tests across 144 nights, consisting of robotic insect-wing mimics, and speakers broadcasting bat prey sounds, and find that bats appear to switch hunting strategies from passive listening to aerial hawking as sound levels increase. Natural acoustic environments are an underappreciated niche axis, a conclusion that serves to escalate the urgency of mitigating human-created noise. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8144611/ /pubmed/34031384 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22390-y Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Gomes, D. G. E.
Toth, C. A.
Cole, H. J.
Francis, C. D.
Barber, J. R.
Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
title Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
title_full Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
title_fullStr Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
title_full_unstemmed Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
title_short Phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
title_sort phantom rivers filter birds and bats by acoustic niche
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144611/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34031384
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41467-021-22390-y
work_keys_str_mv AT gomesdge phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche
AT tothca phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche
AT colehj phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche
AT franciscd phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche
AT barberjr phantomriversfilterbirdsandbatsbyacousticniche