Cargando…

Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital

INTRODUCTION: Healthcare reform efforts focus on patient-centered care is measured by patient satisfaction. Emergency department (ED) satisfaction ratings are often the lowest. Since ED is the first point of contact for the patient care to receive primary care, we aimed to explore patient satisfacti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Abass, Ghassan, Asery, Ali, Al Badr, Ahmed, AlMaghlouth, Adnan, AlOtaiby, Shahad, Heena, Humariya
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123918
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_8_20
_version_ 1783697028293853184
author Abass, Ghassan
Asery, Ali
Al Badr, Ahmed
AlMaghlouth, Adnan
AlOtaiby, Shahad
Heena, Humariya
author_facet Abass, Ghassan
Asery, Ali
Al Badr, Ahmed
AlMaghlouth, Adnan
AlOtaiby, Shahad
Heena, Humariya
author_sort Abass, Ghassan
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Healthcare reform efforts focus on patient-centered care is measured by patient satisfaction. Emergency department (ED) satisfaction ratings are often the lowest. Since ED is the first point of contact for the patient care to receive primary care, we aimed to explore patient satisfaction related to ED healthcare services at our institution. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, ED-CAHPS, a standardized validated nine-item survey questionnaire, was administered via telephonic interviews to Arabic-speaking patients who attended ED at our institution. Patient demographics, ED operation parameters, and healthcare utilization factors were evaluated as patient satisfaction predictors. RESULTS: Out of 713 patients who were contacted 200 patients responded to the survey. In all, 70% of respondents were aged 35-64 years and 55% had secondary or higher education levels. The dimension average for the questions regarding arrival, waiting time, and urgency of treatment was 36%. Regarding satisfaction with pain management was 42%, medication information was 34% and interpreter services were only 40%. The overall dimension average for satisfaction regarding nursing care was 43%, doctor care was 36%. The overall dimension average for satisfaction regarding the discharge process was 56%. The highest scores were observed for whether the patients were asked about follow-up care (61%), whether they understood the symptoms to look for after leaving the ED (58%), and whether they received care within 30 min of arriving at the ED (56%). On the other hand, the worst scores were recorded for whether the patients were made to understand regarding the side effects of new medications (29%), whether nurses spent enough time with them (33%), and whether doctors spent enough time with them (34%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, recommendations were made to improve patients' perceptions/experience in receiving the care and the overall rating. This study presents specific recommendations for maximizing patient satisfaction in primary ED settings in Saudi Arabia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8144764
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81447642021-06-11 Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital Abass, Ghassan Asery, Ali Al Badr, Ahmed AlMaghlouth, Adnan AlOtaiby, Shahad Heena, Humariya J Family Med Prim Care Original Article INTRODUCTION: Healthcare reform efforts focus on patient-centered care is measured by patient satisfaction. Emergency department (ED) satisfaction ratings are often the lowest. Since ED is the first point of contact for the patient care to receive primary care, we aimed to explore patient satisfaction related to ED healthcare services at our institution. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, ED-CAHPS, a standardized validated nine-item survey questionnaire, was administered via telephonic interviews to Arabic-speaking patients who attended ED at our institution. Patient demographics, ED operation parameters, and healthcare utilization factors were evaluated as patient satisfaction predictors. RESULTS: Out of 713 patients who were contacted 200 patients responded to the survey. In all, 70% of respondents were aged 35-64 years and 55% had secondary or higher education levels. The dimension average for the questions regarding arrival, waiting time, and urgency of treatment was 36%. Regarding satisfaction with pain management was 42%, medication information was 34% and interpreter services were only 40%. The overall dimension average for satisfaction regarding nursing care was 43%, doctor care was 36%. The overall dimension average for satisfaction regarding the discharge process was 56%. The highest scores were observed for whether the patients were asked about follow-up care (61%), whether they understood the symptoms to look for after leaving the ED (58%), and whether they received care within 30 min of arriving at the ED (56%). On the other hand, the worst scores were recorded for whether the patients were made to understand regarding the side effects of new medications (29%), whether nurses spent enough time with them (33%), and whether doctors spent enough time with them (34%). CONCLUSIONS: Based on these results, recommendations were made to improve patients' perceptions/experience in receiving the care and the overall rating. This study presents specific recommendations for maximizing patient satisfaction in primary ED settings in Saudi Arabia. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021-04 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8144764/ /pubmed/34123918 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_8_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Family Medicine and Primary Care https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Abass, Ghassan
Asery, Ali
Al Badr, Ahmed
AlMaghlouth, Adnan
AlOtaiby, Shahad
Heena, Humariya
Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital
title Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital
title_full Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital
title_fullStr Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital
title_full_unstemmed Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital
title_short Patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital
title_sort patient satisfaction with the emergency department services at an academic teaching hospital
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144764/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34123918
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jfmpc.jfmpc_8_20
work_keys_str_mv AT abassghassan patientsatisfactionwiththeemergencydepartmentservicesatanacademicteachinghospital
AT aseryali patientsatisfactionwiththeemergencydepartmentservicesatanacademicteachinghospital
AT albadrahmed patientsatisfactionwiththeemergencydepartmentservicesatanacademicteachinghospital
AT almaghlouthadnan patientsatisfactionwiththeemergencydepartmentservicesatanacademicteachinghospital
AT alotaibyshahad patientsatisfactionwiththeemergencydepartmentservicesatanacademicteachinghospital
AT heenahumariya patientsatisfactionwiththeemergencydepartmentservicesatanacademicteachinghospital