Cargando…
Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients
PURPOSE: The effect of the routine use of a stylet during tracheal intubation on first-attempt intubation success is unclear. We hypothesised that the first-attempt intubation success rate would be higher with tracheal tube + stylet than with tracheal tube alone. METHODS: In this multicentre randomi...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer Berlin Heidelberg
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34032882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y |
_version_ | 1783697049219235840 |
---|---|
author | Jaber, Samir Rollé, Amélie Godet, Thomas Terzi, Nicolas Riu, Béatrice Asfar, Pierre Bourenne, Jeremy Ramin, Séverin Lemiale, Virginie Quenot, Jean-Pierre Guitton, Christophe Prudhomme, Eloi Quemeneur, Cyril Blondonnet, Raiko Biais, Mathieu Muller, Laurent Ouattara, Alexandre Ferrandiere, Martine Saint-Léger, Piehr Rimmelé, Thomas Pottecher, Julien Chanques, Gerald Belafia, Fouad Chauveton, Claire Huguet, Helena Asehnoune, Karim Futier, Emmanuel Azoulay, Elie Molinari, Nicolas De Jong, Audrey |
author_facet | Jaber, Samir Rollé, Amélie Godet, Thomas Terzi, Nicolas Riu, Béatrice Asfar, Pierre Bourenne, Jeremy Ramin, Séverin Lemiale, Virginie Quenot, Jean-Pierre Guitton, Christophe Prudhomme, Eloi Quemeneur, Cyril Blondonnet, Raiko Biais, Mathieu Muller, Laurent Ouattara, Alexandre Ferrandiere, Martine Saint-Léger, Piehr Rimmelé, Thomas Pottecher, Julien Chanques, Gerald Belafia, Fouad Chauveton, Claire Huguet, Helena Asehnoune, Karim Futier, Emmanuel Azoulay, Elie Molinari, Nicolas De Jong, Audrey |
author_sort | Jaber, Samir |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: The effect of the routine use of a stylet during tracheal intubation on first-attempt intubation success is unclear. We hypothesised that the first-attempt intubation success rate would be higher with tracheal tube + stylet than with tracheal tube alone. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, conducted in 32 intensive care units, we randomly assigned patients to tracheal tube + stylet or tracheal tube alone (i.e. without stylet). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with first-attempt intubation success. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients with complications related to tracheal intubation. Serious adverse events, i.e., traumatic injuries related to tracheal intubation, were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 999 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 501 (50%) to tracheal tube + stylet and 498 (50%) to tracheal tube alone. First-attempt intubation success occurred in 392 patients (78.2%) in the tracheal tube + stylet group and in 356 (71.5%) in the tracheal tube alone group (absolute risk difference, 6.7; 95%CI 1.4–12.1; relative risk, 1.10; 95%CI 1.02–1.18; P = 0.01). A total of 194 patients (38.7%) in the tracheal tube + stylet group had complications related to tracheal intubation, as compared with 200 patients (40.2%) in the tracheal tube alone group (absolute risk difference, − 1.5; 95%CI − 7.5 to 4.6; relative risk, 0.96; 95%CI 0.83–1.12; P = 0.64). The incidence of serious adverse events was 4.0% and 3.6%, respectively (absolute risk difference, 0.4; 95%CI, − 2.0 to 2.8; relative risk, 1.10; 95%CI 0.59–2.06. P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, using a stylet improves first-attempt intubation success. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8144872 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer Berlin Heidelberg |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81448722021-05-25 Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients Jaber, Samir Rollé, Amélie Godet, Thomas Terzi, Nicolas Riu, Béatrice Asfar, Pierre Bourenne, Jeremy Ramin, Séverin Lemiale, Virginie Quenot, Jean-Pierre Guitton, Christophe Prudhomme, Eloi Quemeneur, Cyril Blondonnet, Raiko Biais, Mathieu Muller, Laurent Ouattara, Alexandre Ferrandiere, Martine Saint-Léger, Piehr Rimmelé, Thomas Pottecher, Julien Chanques, Gerald Belafia, Fouad Chauveton, Claire Huguet, Helena Asehnoune, Karim Futier, Emmanuel Azoulay, Elie Molinari, Nicolas De Jong, Audrey Intensive Care Med Original PURPOSE: The effect of the routine use of a stylet during tracheal intubation on first-attempt intubation success is unclear. We hypothesised that the first-attempt intubation success rate would be higher with tracheal tube + stylet than with tracheal tube alone. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, conducted in 32 intensive care units, we randomly assigned patients to tracheal tube + stylet or tracheal tube alone (i.e. without stylet). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with first-attempt intubation success. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients with complications related to tracheal intubation. Serious adverse events, i.e., traumatic injuries related to tracheal intubation, were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 999 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 501 (50%) to tracheal tube + stylet and 498 (50%) to tracheal tube alone. First-attempt intubation success occurred in 392 patients (78.2%) in the tracheal tube + stylet group and in 356 (71.5%) in the tracheal tube alone group (absolute risk difference, 6.7; 95%CI 1.4–12.1; relative risk, 1.10; 95%CI 1.02–1.18; P = 0.01). A total of 194 patients (38.7%) in the tracheal tube + stylet group had complications related to tracheal intubation, as compared with 200 patients (40.2%) in the tracheal tube alone group (absolute risk difference, − 1.5; 95%CI − 7.5 to 4.6; relative risk, 0.96; 95%CI 0.83–1.12; P = 0.64). The incidence of serious adverse events was 4.0% and 3.6%, respectively (absolute risk difference, 0.4; 95%CI, − 2.0 to 2.8; relative risk, 1.10; 95%CI 0.59–2.06. P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, using a stylet improves first-attempt intubation success. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8144872/ /pubmed/34032882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic. |
spellingShingle | Original Jaber, Samir Rollé, Amélie Godet, Thomas Terzi, Nicolas Riu, Béatrice Asfar, Pierre Bourenne, Jeremy Ramin, Séverin Lemiale, Virginie Quenot, Jean-Pierre Guitton, Christophe Prudhomme, Eloi Quemeneur, Cyril Blondonnet, Raiko Biais, Mathieu Muller, Laurent Ouattara, Alexandre Ferrandiere, Martine Saint-Léger, Piehr Rimmelé, Thomas Pottecher, Julien Chanques, Gerald Belafia, Fouad Chauveton, Claire Huguet, Helena Asehnoune, Karim Futier, Emmanuel Azoulay, Elie Molinari, Nicolas De Jong, Audrey Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients |
title | Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients |
title_full | Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients |
title_fullStr | Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients |
title_short | Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients |
title_sort | effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients |
topic | Original |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144872/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34032882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y |
work_keys_str_mv | AT jabersamir effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT rolleamelie effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT godetthomas effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT terzinicolas effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT riubeatrice effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT asfarpierre effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT bourennejeremy effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT raminseverin effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT lemialevirginie effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT quenotjeanpierre effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT guittonchristophe effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT prudhommeeloi effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT quemeneurcyril effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT blondonnetraiko effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT biaismathieu effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT mullerlaurent effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT ouattaraalexandre effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT ferrandieremartine effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT saintlegerpiehr effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT rimmelethomas effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT pottecherjulien effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT chanquesgerald effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT belafiafouad effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT chauvetonclaire effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT huguethelena effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT asehnounekarim effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT futieremmanuel effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT azoulayelie effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT molinarinicolas effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT dejongaudrey effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients AT effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients |