Cargando…

Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients

PURPOSE: The effect of the routine use of a stylet during tracheal intubation on first-attempt intubation success is unclear. We hypothesised that the first-attempt intubation success rate would be higher with tracheal tube + stylet than with tracheal tube alone. METHODS: In this multicentre randomi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jaber, Samir, Rollé, Amélie, Godet, Thomas, Terzi, Nicolas, Riu, Béatrice, Asfar, Pierre, Bourenne, Jeremy, Ramin, Séverin, Lemiale, Virginie, Quenot, Jean-Pierre, Guitton, Christophe, Prudhomme, Eloi, Quemeneur, Cyril, Blondonnet, Raiko, Biais, Mathieu, Muller, Laurent, Ouattara, Alexandre, Ferrandiere, Martine, Saint-Léger, Piehr, Rimmelé, Thomas, Pottecher, Julien, Chanques, Gerald, Belafia, Fouad, Chauveton, Claire, Huguet, Helena, Asehnoune, Karim, Futier, Emmanuel, Azoulay, Elie, Molinari, Nicolas, De Jong, Audrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34032882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y
_version_ 1783697049219235840
author Jaber, Samir
Rollé, Amélie
Godet, Thomas
Terzi, Nicolas
Riu, Béatrice
Asfar, Pierre
Bourenne, Jeremy
Ramin, Séverin
Lemiale, Virginie
Quenot, Jean-Pierre
Guitton, Christophe
Prudhomme, Eloi
Quemeneur, Cyril
Blondonnet, Raiko
Biais, Mathieu
Muller, Laurent
Ouattara, Alexandre
Ferrandiere, Martine
Saint-Léger, Piehr
Rimmelé, Thomas
Pottecher, Julien
Chanques, Gerald
Belafia, Fouad
Chauveton, Claire
Huguet, Helena
Asehnoune, Karim
Futier, Emmanuel
Azoulay, Elie
Molinari, Nicolas
De Jong, Audrey
author_facet Jaber, Samir
Rollé, Amélie
Godet, Thomas
Terzi, Nicolas
Riu, Béatrice
Asfar, Pierre
Bourenne, Jeremy
Ramin, Séverin
Lemiale, Virginie
Quenot, Jean-Pierre
Guitton, Christophe
Prudhomme, Eloi
Quemeneur, Cyril
Blondonnet, Raiko
Biais, Mathieu
Muller, Laurent
Ouattara, Alexandre
Ferrandiere, Martine
Saint-Léger, Piehr
Rimmelé, Thomas
Pottecher, Julien
Chanques, Gerald
Belafia, Fouad
Chauveton, Claire
Huguet, Helena
Asehnoune, Karim
Futier, Emmanuel
Azoulay, Elie
Molinari, Nicolas
De Jong, Audrey
author_sort Jaber, Samir
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The effect of the routine use of a stylet during tracheal intubation on first-attempt intubation success is unclear. We hypothesised that the first-attempt intubation success rate would be higher with tracheal tube + stylet than with tracheal tube alone. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, conducted in 32 intensive care units, we randomly assigned patients to tracheal tube + stylet or tracheal tube alone (i.e. without stylet). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with first-attempt intubation success. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients with complications related to tracheal intubation. Serious adverse events, i.e., traumatic injuries related to tracheal intubation, were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 999 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 501 (50%) to tracheal tube + stylet and 498 (50%) to tracheal tube alone. First-attempt intubation success occurred in 392 patients (78.2%) in the tracheal tube + stylet group and in 356 (71.5%) in the tracheal tube alone group (absolute risk difference, 6.7; 95%CI 1.4–12.1; relative risk, 1.10; 95%CI 1.02–1.18; P = 0.01). A total of 194 patients (38.7%) in the tracheal tube + stylet group had complications related to tracheal intubation, as compared with 200 patients (40.2%) in the tracheal tube alone group (absolute risk difference, − 1.5; 95%CI − 7.5 to 4.6; relative risk, 0.96; 95%CI 0.83–1.12; P = 0.64). The incidence of serious adverse events was 4.0% and 3.6%, respectively (absolute risk difference, 0.4; 95%CI, − 2.0 to 2.8; relative risk, 1.10; 95%CI 0.59–2.06. P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, using a stylet improves first-attempt intubation success. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8144872
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer Berlin Heidelberg
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81448722021-05-25 Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients Jaber, Samir Rollé, Amélie Godet, Thomas Terzi, Nicolas Riu, Béatrice Asfar, Pierre Bourenne, Jeremy Ramin, Séverin Lemiale, Virginie Quenot, Jean-Pierre Guitton, Christophe Prudhomme, Eloi Quemeneur, Cyril Blondonnet, Raiko Biais, Mathieu Muller, Laurent Ouattara, Alexandre Ferrandiere, Martine Saint-Léger, Piehr Rimmelé, Thomas Pottecher, Julien Chanques, Gerald Belafia, Fouad Chauveton, Claire Huguet, Helena Asehnoune, Karim Futier, Emmanuel Azoulay, Elie Molinari, Nicolas De Jong, Audrey Intensive Care Med Original PURPOSE: The effect of the routine use of a stylet during tracheal intubation on first-attempt intubation success is unclear. We hypothesised that the first-attempt intubation success rate would be higher with tracheal tube + stylet than with tracheal tube alone. METHODS: In this multicentre randomised controlled trial, conducted in 32 intensive care units, we randomly assigned patients to tracheal tube + stylet or tracheal tube alone (i.e. without stylet). The primary outcome was the proportion of patients with first-attempt intubation success. The secondary outcome was the proportion of patients with complications related to tracheal intubation. Serious adverse events, i.e., traumatic injuries related to tracheal intubation, were evaluated. RESULTS: A total of 999 patients were included in the modified intention-to-treat analysis: 501 (50%) to tracheal tube + stylet and 498 (50%) to tracheal tube alone. First-attempt intubation success occurred in 392 patients (78.2%) in the tracheal tube + stylet group and in 356 (71.5%) in the tracheal tube alone group (absolute risk difference, 6.7; 95%CI 1.4–12.1; relative risk, 1.10; 95%CI 1.02–1.18; P = 0.01). A total of 194 patients (38.7%) in the tracheal tube + stylet group had complications related to tracheal intubation, as compared with 200 patients (40.2%) in the tracheal tube alone group (absolute risk difference, − 1.5; 95%CI − 7.5 to 4.6; relative risk, 0.96; 95%CI 0.83–1.12; P = 0.64). The incidence of serious adverse events was 4.0% and 3.6%, respectively (absolute risk difference, 0.4; 95%CI, − 2.0 to 2.8; relative risk, 1.10; 95%CI 0.59–2.06. P = 0.76). CONCLUSIONS: Among critically ill adults undergoing tracheal intubation, using a stylet improves first-attempt intubation success. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y. Springer Berlin Heidelberg 2021-05-25 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8144872/ /pubmed/34032882 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y Text en © Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature 2021 This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.
spellingShingle Original
Jaber, Samir
Rollé, Amélie
Godet, Thomas
Terzi, Nicolas
Riu, Béatrice
Asfar, Pierre
Bourenne, Jeremy
Ramin, Séverin
Lemiale, Virginie
Quenot, Jean-Pierre
Guitton, Christophe
Prudhomme, Eloi
Quemeneur, Cyril
Blondonnet, Raiko
Biais, Mathieu
Muller, Laurent
Ouattara, Alexandre
Ferrandiere, Martine
Saint-Léger, Piehr
Rimmelé, Thomas
Pottecher, Julien
Chanques, Gerald
Belafia, Fouad
Chauveton, Claire
Huguet, Helena
Asehnoune, Karim
Futier, Emmanuel
Azoulay, Elie
Molinari, Nicolas
De Jong, Audrey
Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients
title Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients
title_full Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients
title_fullStr Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients
title_full_unstemmed Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients
title_short Effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients
title_sort effect of the use of an endotracheal tube and stylet versus an endotracheal tube alone on first-attempt intubation success: a multicentre, randomised clinical trial in 999 patients
topic Original
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8144872/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34032882
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s00134-021-06417-y
work_keys_str_mv AT jabersamir effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT rolleamelie effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT godetthomas effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT terzinicolas effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT riubeatrice effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT asfarpierre effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT bourennejeremy effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT raminseverin effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT lemialevirginie effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT quenotjeanpierre effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT guittonchristophe effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT prudhommeeloi effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT quemeneurcyril effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT blondonnetraiko effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT biaismathieu effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT mullerlaurent effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT ouattaraalexandre effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT ferrandieremartine effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT saintlegerpiehr effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT rimmelethomas effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT pottecherjulien effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT chanquesgerald effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT belafiafouad effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT chauvetonclaire effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT huguethelena effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT asehnounekarim effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT futieremmanuel effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT azoulayelie effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT molinarinicolas effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT dejongaudrey effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients
AT effectoftheuseofanendotrachealtubeandstyletversusanendotrachealtubealoneonfirstattemptintubationsuccessamulticentrerandomisedclinicaltrialin999patients