Cargando…

Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence

Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the phenomenon that a person is slower to respond to targets at a previously cued location. The present study aimed to explore whether target-reward association is subject to IOR, using event-related potentials (ERPs) to explore the underlying neural mechanism. E...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Li, Xian, Zhang, Meichen, Wu, Lulu, Zhang, Qin, Wei, Ping
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045946
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.608427
_version_ 1783697137421254656
author Li, Xian
Zhang, Meichen
Wu, Lulu
Zhang, Qin
Wei, Ping
author_facet Li, Xian
Zhang, Meichen
Wu, Lulu
Zhang, Qin
Wei, Ping
author_sort Li, Xian
collection PubMed
description Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the phenomenon that a person is slower to respond to targets at a previously cued location. The present study aimed to explore whether target-reward association is subject to IOR, using event-related potentials (ERPs) to explore the underlying neural mechanism. Each participant performed a localization task and a color discrimination task in an exogenous cueing paradigm, with the targets presented in colors (green/red) previously associated with high- or low-reward probability. The results of both tasks revealed that the N1, Nd, and P3 components exhibited differential amplitudes between cued and uncued trials (i.e., IOR) under low reward, with the N1 and Nd amplitudes being enhanced for uncued trials compared to cued trials, and the P3 amplitude being enhanced for cued trials vs. uncued trials. Under high reward, however, no difference was found between the amplitudes on cued and uncued trials for any of the components. These findings demonstrate that targets that were previously associated with high reward can be resistant to IOR and the current results enrich the evidence for interactions between reward-association and attentional orientation in the cueing paradigm.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8145282
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81452822021-05-26 Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence Li, Xian Zhang, Meichen Wu, Lulu Zhang, Qin Wei, Ping Front Hum Neurosci Neuroscience Inhibition of return (IOR) refers to the phenomenon that a person is slower to respond to targets at a previously cued location. The present study aimed to explore whether target-reward association is subject to IOR, using event-related potentials (ERPs) to explore the underlying neural mechanism. Each participant performed a localization task and a color discrimination task in an exogenous cueing paradigm, with the targets presented in colors (green/red) previously associated with high- or low-reward probability. The results of both tasks revealed that the N1, Nd, and P3 components exhibited differential amplitudes between cued and uncued trials (i.e., IOR) under low reward, with the N1 and Nd amplitudes being enhanced for uncued trials compared to cued trials, and the P3 amplitude being enhanced for cued trials vs. uncued trials. Under high reward, however, no difference was found between the amplitudes on cued and uncued trials for any of the components. These findings demonstrate that targets that were previously associated with high reward can be resistant to IOR and the current results enrich the evidence for interactions between reward-association and attentional orientation in the cueing paradigm. Frontiers Media S.A. 2021-05-03 /pmc/articles/PMC8145282/ /pubmed/34045946 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.608427 Text en Copyright © 2021 Li, Zhang, Wu, Zhang and Wei. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Neuroscience
Li, Xian
Zhang, Meichen
Wu, Lulu
Zhang, Qin
Wei, Ping
Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence
title Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence
title_full Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence
title_fullStr Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence
title_full_unstemmed Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence
title_short Neural Mechanisms of Reward-by-Cueing Interactions: ERP Evidence
title_sort neural mechanisms of reward-by-cueing interactions: erp evidence
topic Neuroscience
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145282/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34045946
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fnhum.2021.608427
work_keys_str_mv AT lixian neuralmechanismsofrewardbycueinginteractionserpevidence
AT zhangmeichen neuralmechanismsofrewardbycueinginteractionserpevidence
AT wululu neuralmechanismsofrewardbycueinginteractionserpevidence
AT zhangqin neuralmechanismsofrewardbycueinginteractionserpevidence
AT weiping neuralmechanismsofrewardbycueinginteractionserpevidence