Cargando…

Microbes: Food for the Future

Current projections estimate that in 2050 about 10 billion people will inhabit the earth and food production will need to increase by more than 60%. Food security will therefore represent a matter of global concern not easily tackled with current agriculture practices and curbed by the increasing sc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ciani, Matilde, Lippolis, Antonio, Fava, Federico, Rodolfi, Liliana, Niccolai, Alberto, Tredici, Mario R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10050971
_version_ 1783697220124540928
author Ciani, Matilde
Lippolis, Antonio
Fava, Federico
Rodolfi, Liliana
Niccolai, Alberto
Tredici, Mario R.
author_facet Ciani, Matilde
Lippolis, Antonio
Fava, Federico
Rodolfi, Liliana
Niccolai, Alberto
Tredici, Mario R.
author_sort Ciani, Matilde
collection PubMed
description Current projections estimate that in 2050 about 10 billion people will inhabit the earth and food production will need to increase by more than 60%. Food security will therefore represent a matter of global concern not easily tackled with current agriculture practices and curbed by the increasing scarcity of natural resources and climate change. Disrupting technologies are urgently needed to improve the efficiency of the food production system and to reduce the negative externalities of agriculture (soil erosion, desertification, air pollution, water and soil contamination, biodiversity loss, etc.). Among the most innovative technologies, the production of microbial protein (MP) in controlled and intensive systems called “bioreactors” is receiving increasing attention from research and industry. MP has low arable land requirements, does not directly compete with crop-based food commodities, and uses fertilizers with an almost 100% efficiency. This review considers the potential and limitations of four MP sources currently tested at pilot level or sold as food or feed ingredients: hydrogen oxidizing bacteria (HOB), methanotrophs, fungi, and microalgae (cyanobacteria). The environmental impacts (energy, land, water use, and GHG emissions) of these MP sources are compared with those of plant, animal, insect, and cultured meat-based proteins. Prices are reported to address whether MP may compete with traditional protein sources. Microalgae cultivation under artificial light is discussed as a strategy to ensure independence from weather conditions, continuous operation over the year, as well as high-quality biomass. The main challenges to the spreading of MP use are discussed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8145633
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81456332021-05-26 Microbes: Food for the Future Ciani, Matilde Lippolis, Antonio Fava, Federico Rodolfi, Liliana Niccolai, Alberto Tredici, Mario R. Foods Review Current projections estimate that in 2050 about 10 billion people will inhabit the earth and food production will need to increase by more than 60%. Food security will therefore represent a matter of global concern not easily tackled with current agriculture practices and curbed by the increasing scarcity of natural resources and climate change. Disrupting technologies are urgently needed to improve the efficiency of the food production system and to reduce the negative externalities of agriculture (soil erosion, desertification, air pollution, water and soil contamination, biodiversity loss, etc.). Among the most innovative technologies, the production of microbial protein (MP) in controlled and intensive systems called “bioreactors” is receiving increasing attention from research and industry. MP has low arable land requirements, does not directly compete with crop-based food commodities, and uses fertilizers with an almost 100% efficiency. This review considers the potential and limitations of four MP sources currently tested at pilot level or sold as food or feed ingredients: hydrogen oxidizing bacteria (HOB), methanotrophs, fungi, and microalgae (cyanobacteria). The environmental impacts (energy, land, water use, and GHG emissions) of these MP sources are compared with those of plant, animal, insect, and cultured meat-based proteins. Prices are reported to address whether MP may compete with traditional protein sources. Microalgae cultivation under artificial light is discussed as a strategy to ensure independence from weather conditions, continuous operation over the year, as well as high-quality biomass. The main challenges to the spreading of MP use are discussed. MDPI 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8145633/ /pubmed/33925123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10050971 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Ciani, Matilde
Lippolis, Antonio
Fava, Federico
Rodolfi, Liliana
Niccolai, Alberto
Tredici, Mario R.
Microbes: Food for the Future
title Microbes: Food for the Future
title_full Microbes: Food for the Future
title_fullStr Microbes: Food for the Future
title_full_unstemmed Microbes: Food for the Future
title_short Microbes: Food for the Future
title_sort microbes: food for the future
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145633/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925123
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10050971
work_keys_str_mv AT cianimatilde microbesfoodforthefuture
AT lippolisantonio microbesfoodforthefuture
AT favafederico microbesfoodforthefuture
AT rodolfililiana microbesfoodforthefuture
AT niccolaialberto microbesfoodforthefuture
AT tredicimarior microbesfoodforthefuture