Cargando…
Microbes: Food for the Future
Current projections estimate that in 2050 about 10 billion people will inhabit the earth and food production will need to increase by more than 60%. Food security will therefore represent a matter of global concern not easily tackled with current agriculture practices and curbed by the increasing sc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10050971 |
_version_ | 1783697220124540928 |
---|---|
author | Ciani, Matilde Lippolis, Antonio Fava, Federico Rodolfi, Liliana Niccolai, Alberto Tredici, Mario R. |
author_facet | Ciani, Matilde Lippolis, Antonio Fava, Federico Rodolfi, Liliana Niccolai, Alberto Tredici, Mario R. |
author_sort | Ciani, Matilde |
collection | PubMed |
description | Current projections estimate that in 2050 about 10 billion people will inhabit the earth and food production will need to increase by more than 60%. Food security will therefore represent a matter of global concern not easily tackled with current agriculture practices and curbed by the increasing scarcity of natural resources and climate change. Disrupting technologies are urgently needed to improve the efficiency of the food production system and to reduce the negative externalities of agriculture (soil erosion, desertification, air pollution, water and soil contamination, biodiversity loss, etc.). Among the most innovative technologies, the production of microbial protein (MP) in controlled and intensive systems called “bioreactors” is receiving increasing attention from research and industry. MP has low arable land requirements, does not directly compete with crop-based food commodities, and uses fertilizers with an almost 100% efficiency. This review considers the potential and limitations of four MP sources currently tested at pilot level or sold as food or feed ingredients: hydrogen oxidizing bacteria (HOB), methanotrophs, fungi, and microalgae (cyanobacteria). The environmental impacts (energy, land, water use, and GHG emissions) of these MP sources are compared with those of plant, animal, insect, and cultured meat-based proteins. Prices are reported to address whether MP may compete with traditional protein sources. Microalgae cultivation under artificial light is discussed as a strategy to ensure independence from weather conditions, continuous operation over the year, as well as high-quality biomass. The main challenges to the spreading of MP use are discussed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8145633 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81456332021-05-26 Microbes: Food for the Future Ciani, Matilde Lippolis, Antonio Fava, Federico Rodolfi, Liliana Niccolai, Alberto Tredici, Mario R. Foods Review Current projections estimate that in 2050 about 10 billion people will inhabit the earth and food production will need to increase by more than 60%. Food security will therefore represent a matter of global concern not easily tackled with current agriculture practices and curbed by the increasing scarcity of natural resources and climate change. Disrupting technologies are urgently needed to improve the efficiency of the food production system and to reduce the negative externalities of agriculture (soil erosion, desertification, air pollution, water and soil contamination, biodiversity loss, etc.). Among the most innovative technologies, the production of microbial protein (MP) in controlled and intensive systems called “bioreactors” is receiving increasing attention from research and industry. MP has low arable land requirements, does not directly compete with crop-based food commodities, and uses fertilizers with an almost 100% efficiency. This review considers the potential and limitations of four MP sources currently tested at pilot level or sold as food or feed ingredients: hydrogen oxidizing bacteria (HOB), methanotrophs, fungi, and microalgae (cyanobacteria). The environmental impacts (energy, land, water use, and GHG emissions) of these MP sources are compared with those of plant, animal, insect, and cultured meat-based proteins. Prices are reported to address whether MP may compete with traditional protein sources. Microalgae cultivation under artificial light is discussed as a strategy to ensure independence from weather conditions, continuous operation over the year, as well as high-quality biomass. The main challenges to the spreading of MP use are discussed. MDPI 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8145633/ /pubmed/33925123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10050971 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Ciani, Matilde Lippolis, Antonio Fava, Federico Rodolfi, Liliana Niccolai, Alberto Tredici, Mario R. Microbes: Food for the Future |
title | Microbes: Food for the Future |
title_full | Microbes: Food for the Future |
title_fullStr | Microbes: Food for the Future |
title_full_unstemmed | Microbes: Food for the Future |
title_short | Microbes: Food for the Future |
title_sort | microbes: food for the future |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145633/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925123 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10050971 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cianimatilde microbesfoodforthefuture AT lippolisantonio microbesfoodforthefuture AT favafederico microbesfoodforthefuture AT rodolfililiana microbesfoodforthefuture AT niccolaialberto microbesfoodforthefuture AT tredicimarior microbesfoodforthefuture |