Cargando…

Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10)

Ag(16)B(4)O(10) has been obtained as a coarse crystalline material via hydrothermal synthesis, and was characterized by X-ray single crystal and powder diffraction, conductivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements, as well as by DFT based theoretical analyses. Neither composition nor crystal st...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kovalevskiy, Anton, Yin, Congling, Nuss, Jürgen, Wedig, Ulrich, Jansen, Martin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9sc05185f
_version_ 1783697239402610688
author Kovalevskiy, Anton
Yin, Congling
Nuss, Jürgen
Wedig, Ulrich
Jansen, Martin
author_facet Kovalevskiy, Anton
Yin, Congling
Nuss, Jürgen
Wedig, Ulrich
Jansen, Martin
author_sort Kovalevskiy, Anton
collection PubMed
description Ag(16)B(4)O(10) has been obtained as a coarse crystalline material via hydrothermal synthesis, and was characterized by X-ray single crystal and powder diffraction, conductivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements, as well as by DFT based theoretical analyses. Neither composition nor crystal structure nor valence electron counts can be fully rationalized by applying known bonding schemes. While the rare cage anion (B(4)O(10))(8−) is electron precise, and reflects standard bonding properties, the silver ion substructure necessarily has to accommodate eight excess electrons per formula unit, (Ag(+))(16)(B(3+))(4)(O(2−))(10) × 8e(−), rendering the compound sub-valent with respect to silver. However, the phenomena commonly associated with sub-valence metal (partial) structures are not perceptible in this case. Experimentally, the compound has been found to be semiconducting and diamagnetic, ruling out the presence of itinerant electrons; hence the excess electrons have to localize pairwise. However, no pairwise contractions of silver atoms are realized in the structure, thus excluding formation of 2e–2c bonds. Rather, cluster-like aggregates of an approximately tetrahedral shape exist where the Ag–Ag separations are significantly smaller than in elemental silver. The number of these subunits per formula is four, thus matching the required number of sites for pairwise nesting of eight excess electrons. This scenario has been corroborated by computational analyses of the densities of states and electron localization function (ELF), which clearly indicate the presence of an attractor within the shrunken tetrahedral voids in the silver substructure. However, one bonding electron pair of s and p type skeleton electrons per cluster unit is extremely low, and the significant propensity to form and the thermal stability of the title compound suggest d(10)–d(10) bonding interactions to strengthen the inter-cluster bonding in a synergistic fashion. With the present state of knowledge, such a particular bonding pattern appears to be a singular feature of the oxide chemistry of silver; however, as indicated by analogous findings in related silver oxides, it is evolving as a general one.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8145714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2019
publisher The Royal Society of Chemistry
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81457142021-06-02 Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10) Kovalevskiy, Anton Yin, Congling Nuss, Jürgen Wedig, Ulrich Jansen, Martin Chem Sci Chemistry Ag(16)B(4)O(10) has been obtained as a coarse crystalline material via hydrothermal synthesis, and was characterized by X-ray single crystal and powder diffraction, conductivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements, as well as by DFT based theoretical analyses. Neither composition nor crystal structure nor valence electron counts can be fully rationalized by applying known bonding schemes. While the rare cage anion (B(4)O(10))(8−) is electron precise, and reflects standard bonding properties, the silver ion substructure necessarily has to accommodate eight excess electrons per formula unit, (Ag(+))(16)(B(3+))(4)(O(2−))(10) × 8e(−), rendering the compound sub-valent with respect to silver. However, the phenomena commonly associated with sub-valence metal (partial) structures are not perceptible in this case. Experimentally, the compound has been found to be semiconducting and diamagnetic, ruling out the presence of itinerant electrons; hence the excess electrons have to localize pairwise. However, no pairwise contractions of silver atoms are realized in the structure, thus excluding formation of 2e–2c bonds. Rather, cluster-like aggregates of an approximately tetrahedral shape exist where the Ag–Ag separations are significantly smaller than in elemental silver. The number of these subunits per formula is four, thus matching the required number of sites for pairwise nesting of eight excess electrons. This scenario has been corroborated by computational analyses of the densities of states and electron localization function (ELF), which clearly indicate the presence of an attractor within the shrunken tetrahedral voids in the silver substructure. However, one bonding electron pair of s and p type skeleton electrons per cluster unit is extremely low, and the significant propensity to form and the thermal stability of the title compound suggest d(10)–d(10) bonding interactions to strengthen the inter-cluster bonding in a synergistic fashion. With the present state of knowledge, such a particular bonding pattern appears to be a singular feature of the oxide chemistry of silver; however, as indicated by analogous findings in related silver oxides, it is evolving as a general one. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8145714/ /pubmed/34084350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9sc05185f Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/
spellingShingle Chemistry
Kovalevskiy, Anton
Yin, Congling
Nuss, Jürgen
Wedig, Ulrich
Jansen, Martin
Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10)
title Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10)
title_full Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10)
title_fullStr Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10)
title_full_unstemmed Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10)
title_short Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10)
title_sort uncommon structural and bonding properties in ag(16)b(4)o(10)
topic Chemistry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145714/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084350
http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9sc05185f
work_keys_str_mv AT kovalevskiyanton uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10
AT yincongling uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10
AT nussjurgen uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10
AT wedigulrich uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10
AT jansenmartin uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10