Cargando…
Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10)
Ag(16)B(4)O(10) has been obtained as a coarse crystalline material via hydrothermal synthesis, and was characterized by X-ray single crystal and powder diffraction, conductivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements, as well as by DFT based theoretical analyses. Neither composition nor crystal st...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Royal Society of Chemistry
2019
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9sc05185f |
_version_ | 1783697239402610688 |
---|---|
author | Kovalevskiy, Anton Yin, Congling Nuss, Jürgen Wedig, Ulrich Jansen, Martin |
author_facet | Kovalevskiy, Anton Yin, Congling Nuss, Jürgen Wedig, Ulrich Jansen, Martin |
author_sort | Kovalevskiy, Anton |
collection | PubMed |
description | Ag(16)B(4)O(10) has been obtained as a coarse crystalline material via hydrothermal synthesis, and was characterized by X-ray single crystal and powder diffraction, conductivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements, as well as by DFT based theoretical analyses. Neither composition nor crystal structure nor valence electron counts can be fully rationalized by applying known bonding schemes. While the rare cage anion (B(4)O(10))(8−) is electron precise, and reflects standard bonding properties, the silver ion substructure necessarily has to accommodate eight excess electrons per formula unit, (Ag(+))(16)(B(3+))(4)(O(2−))(10) × 8e(−), rendering the compound sub-valent with respect to silver. However, the phenomena commonly associated with sub-valence metal (partial) structures are not perceptible in this case. Experimentally, the compound has been found to be semiconducting and diamagnetic, ruling out the presence of itinerant electrons; hence the excess electrons have to localize pairwise. However, no pairwise contractions of silver atoms are realized in the structure, thus excluding formation of 2e–2c bonds. Rather, cluster-like aggregates of an approximately tetrahedral shape exist where the Ag–Ag separations are significantly smaller than in elemental silver. The number of these subunits per formula is four, thus matching the required number of sites for pairwise nesting of eight excess electrons. This scenario has been corroborated by computational analyses of the densities of states and electron localization function (ELF), which clearly indicate the presence of an attractor within the shrunken tetrahedral voids in the silver substructure. However, one bonding electron pair of s and p type skeleton electrons per cluster unit is extremely low, and the significant propensity to form and the thermal stability of the title compound suggest d(10)–d(10) bonding interactions to strengthen the inter-cluster bonding in a synergistic fashion. With the present state of knowledge, such a particular bonding pattern appears to be a singular feature of the oxide chemistry of silver; however, as indicated by analogous findings in related silver oxides, it is evolving as a general one. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8145714 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2019 |
publisher | The Royal Society of Chemistry |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81457142021-06-02 Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10) Kovalevskiy, Anton Yin, Congling Nuss, Jürgen Wedig, Ulrich Jansen, Martin Chem Sci Chemistry Ag(16)B(4)O(10) has been obtained as a coarse crystalline material via hydrothermal synthesis, and was characterized by X-ray single crystal and powder diffraction, conductivity and magnetic susceptibility measurements, as well as by DFT based theoretical analyses. Neither composition nor crystal structure nor valence electron counts can be fully rationalized by applying known bonding schemes. While the rare cage anion (B(4)O(10))(8−) is electron precise, and reflects standard bonding properties, the silver ion substructure necessarily has to accommodate eight excess electrons per formula unit, (Ag(+))(16)(B(3+))(4)(O(2−))(10) × 8e(−), rendering the compound sub-valent with respect to silver. However, the phenomena commonly associated with sub-valence metal (partial) structures are not perceptible in this case. Experimentally, the compound has been found to be semiconducting and diamagnetic, ruling out the presence of itinerant electrons; hence the excess electrons have to localize pairwise. However, no pairwise contractions of silver atoms are realized in the structure, thus excluding formation of 2e–2c bonds. Rather, cluster-like aggregates of an approximately tetrahedral shape exist where the Ag–Ag separations are significantly smaller than in elemental silver. The number of these subunits per formula is four, thus matching the required number of sites for pairwise nesting of eight excess electrons. This scenario has been corroborated by computational analyses of the densities of states and electron localization function (ELF), which clearly indicate the presence of an attractor within the shrunken tetrahedral voids in the silver substructure. However, one bonding electron pair of s and p type skeleton electrons per cluster unit is extremely low, and the significant propensity to form and the thermal stability of the title compound suggest d(10)–d(10) bonding interactions to strengthen the inter-cluster bonding in a synergistic fashion. With the present state of knowledge, such a particular bonding pattern appears to be a singular feature of the oxide chemistry of silver; however, as indicated by analogous findings in related silver oxides, it is evolving as a general one. The Royal Society of Chemistry 2019-12-09 /pmc/articles/PMC8145714/ /pubmed/34084350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9sc05185f Text en This journal is © The Royal Society of Chemistry https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ |
spellingShingle | Chemistry Kovalevskiy, Anton Yin, Congling Nuss, Jürgen Wedig, Ulrich Jansen, Martin Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10) |
title | Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10) |
title_full | Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10) |
title_fullStr | Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10) |
title_full_unstemmed | Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10) |
title_short | Uncommon structural and bonding properties in Ag(16)B(4)O(10) |
title_sort | uncommon structural and bonding properties in ag(16)b(4)o(10) |
topic | Chemistry |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145714/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084350 http://dx.doi.org/10.1039/c9sc05185f |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kovalevskiyanton uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10 AT yincongling uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10 AT nussjurgen uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10 AT wedigulrich uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10 AT jansenmartin uncommonstructuralandbondingpropertiesinag16b4o10 |