Cargando…
A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth
BACKGROUND: Youth ages 15 to 24, who comprise a large portion of sub-Saharan Africa, face a higher burden of unmet contraceptive need than adults. Despite increased international and national commitments to improving young people’s access to contraception, significant barriers impede their access to...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34034757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01160-5 |
_version_ | 1783697251416145920 |
---|---|
author | Ouma, Lynette Bozkurt, Burcu Chanley, Jill Power, Christine Kakonge, Ronald Adeyemi, Oluwatosin C. Kudekallu, Ramya Jawahar Leahy Madsen, Elizabeth |
author_facet | Ouma, Lynette Bozkurt, Burcu Chanley, Jill Power, Christine Kakonge, Ronald Adeyemi, Oluwatosin C. Kudekallu, Ramya Jawahar Leahy Madsen, Elizabeth |
author_sort | Ouma, Lynette |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Youth ages 15 to 24, who comprise a large portion of sub-Saharan Africa, face a higher burden of unmet contraceptive need than adults. Despite increased international and national commitments to improving young people’s access to contraception, significant barriers impede their access to a full range of methods. To further explore these barriers among youth in Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda, we conducted a qualitative study to capture the challenges that affect contraceptive method decisionmaking and complicate youth access to the full method mix. METHODS: To understand factors that impact young people’s contraceptive decisionmaking process across all three countries, we conducted a total of 35 focus group discussions with 171 youth ages 15 to 24 and 130 in-depth interviews with key stakeholders working in youth family planning. Questionnaires aligned with the High Impact Practices in Family Planning’s elements of adolescent-friendly contraceptive services. Data were coded with MAXQDA and analyzed using a framework for contraceptive decisionmaking to identify relevant patterns and themes. RESULTS: In all three countries, youth reported that condoms are the most commonly sought contraceptive method because they are easiest to access and because youth have limited knowledge of other methods. Youth from diverse settings shared uncertainty and concern about the safety and side effects of many methods other than condoms, complicating their ability to take full advantage of other available methods. While most youth in Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda reported at least moderate confidence in obtaining the information needed to help choose a method, and only a few youth reported that they are completely unable to access contraceptives, other barriers still present a major deterrent for youth, including cost, inconvenient facility hours and long wait times, and stigma from family, community members, and providers. CONCLUSIONS: Young people’s ability to fully exercise their method choice remains limited despite availability of services, leading them to take the path of least resistance. Program implementers and policymakers should consider the diverse and often interconnected barriers that youth face in attempting to enjoy the benefits of a full spectrum of contraceptive methods and design multi-level interventions to mitigate such barriers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01160-5. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8145785 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81457852021-05-25 A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth Ouma, Lynette Bozkurt, Burcu Chanley, Jill Power, Christine Kakonge, Ronald Adeyemi, Oluwatosin C. Kudekallu, Ramya Jawahar Leahy Madsen, Elizabeth Reprod Health Research BACKGROUND: Youth ages 15 to 24, who comprise a large portion of sub-Saharan Africa, face a higher burden of unmet contraceptive need than adults. Despite increased international and national commitments to improving young people’s access to contraception, significant barriers impede their access to a full range of methods. To further explore these barriers among youth in Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda, we conducted a qualitative study to capture the challenges that affect contraceptive method decisionmaking and complicate youth access to the full method mix. METHODS: To understand factors that impact young people’s contraceptive decisionmaking process across all three countries, we conducted a total of 35 focus group discussions with 171 youth ages 15 to 24 and 130 in-depth interviews with key stakeholders working in youth family planning. Questionnaires aligned with the High Impact Practices in Family Planning’s elements of adolescent-friendly contraceptive services. Data were coded with MAXQDA and analyzed using a framework for contraceptive decisionmaking to identify relevant patterns and themes. RESULTS: In all three countries, youth reported that condoms are the most commonly sought contraceptive method because they are easiest to access and because youth have limited knowledge of other methods. Youth from diverse settings shared uncertainty and concern about the safety and side effects of many methods other than condoms, complicating their ability to take full advantage of other available methods. While most youth in Kenya, Nigeria, and Uganda reported at least moderate confidence in obtaining the information needed to help choose a method, and only a few youth reported that they are completely unable to access contraceptives, other barriers still present a major deterrent for youth, including cost, inconvenient facility hours and long wait times, and stigma from family, community members, and providers. CONCLUSIONS: Young people’s ability to fully exercise their method choice remains limited despite availability of services, leading them to take the path of least resistance. Program implementers and policymakers should consider the diverse and often interconnected barriers that youth face in attempting to enjoy the benefits of a full spectrum of contraceptive methods and design multi-level interventions to mitigate such barriers. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s12978-021-01160-5. BioMed Central 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8145785/ /pubmed/34034757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01160-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) . The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) ) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data. |
spellingShingle | Research Ouma, Lynette Bozkurt, Burcu Chanley, Jill Power, Christine Kakonge, Ronald Adeyemi, Oluwatosin C. Kudekallu, Ramya Jawahar Leahy Madsen, Elizabeth A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth |
title | A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth |
title_full | A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth |
title_fullStr | A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth |
title_full_unstemmed | A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth |
title_short | A cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth |
title_sort | cross-country qualitative study on contraceptive method mix: contraceptive decisionmaking among youth |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145785/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34034757 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12978-021-01160-5 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT oumalynette acrosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT bozkurtburcu acrosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT chanleyjill acrosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT powerchristine acrosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT kakongeronald acrosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT adeyemioluwatosinc acrosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT kudekalluramyajawahar acrosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT leahymadsenelizabeth acrosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT oumalynette crosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT bozkurtburcu crosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT chanleyjill crosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT powerchristine crosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT kakongeronald crosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT adeyemioluwatosinc crosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT kudekalluramyajawahar crosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth AT leahymadsenelizabeth crosscountryqualitativestudyoncontraceptivemethodmixcontraceptivedecisionmakingamongyouth |