Cargando…
Impact of Implant Surface Material and Microscale Roughness on the Initial Attachment and Proliferation of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts
SIMPLE SUMMARY: In recent years, zirconia dental implant systems, also known as “ceramic implants”, became an alternative to the commonly used titanium implants. The clinical success of dental implants depends on several factors, particularly on the soft tissue formation around the implant abutment,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10050356 |
_version_ | 1783697264604086272 |
---|---|
author | Rausch, Marco Aoqi Shokoohi-Tabrizi, Hassan Wehner, Christian Pippenger, Benjamin E. Wagner, Raphael S. Ulm, Christian Moritz, Andreas Chen, Jiang Andrukhov, Oleh |
author_facet | Rausch, Marco Aoqi Shokoohi-Tabrizi, Hassan Wehner, Christian Pippenger, Benjamin E. Wagner, Raphael S. Ulm, Christian Moritz, Andreas Chen, Jiang Andrukhov, Oleh |
author_sort | Rausch, Marco Aoqi |
collection | PubMed |
description | SIMPLE SUMMARY: In recent years, zirconia dental implant systems, also known as “ceramic implants”, became an alternative to the commonly used titanium implants. The clinical success of dental implants depends on several factors, particularly on the soft tissue formation around the implant abutment, but the implant surfaces, which at most support this process, are still to be found. In the present study, we cultured human gingival cells on surfaces that were made from either titanium or zirconia. These surfaces were differently treated and, subsequently, had different roughness: some surfaces were machined and smooth, whereas other surfaces were sand-blasted and rough. The cells ability to attach and grow was slightly decreased by rougher surfaces, whereas no effect of implant material was observed. Furthermore, the expression of some proteins mediating cell attachment to the surface was strongly affected by the roughness and only marginally by the implant material. We concluded that the behavior of gingival cells is primarily influenced by surface roughness, whereas no apparent advantage of either material could be observed. This suggests the importance of surface makeup in relation to how soft tissue healing around the implant is promoted and might provide new approaches for future research. ABSTRACT: Due to the rising demand for zirconia (Zr) based implant systems, it is important to understand the impact of Zr and titanium (Ti) implants and particularly their topography on soft tissue healing. As human gingival fibroblasts (hGFs) are the predominant cells in peri-implant soft tissue, we focused on examining the effect of implant material and surface roughness on hGFs’ initial attachment, growth and the expression of proteins involved in the focal adhesion. hGFs isolated from eight healthy donors were cultured on the following surfaces: smooth titanium machined surface (TiM), smooth zirconia machined surface (ZrM), moderately rough titanium surface (SLA), or moderately rough zirconia surface (ZLA) for up to 14 days. The initial attachment of hGFs was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Cell proliferation/viability was assessed by cell counting kit 8. Focal adhesion and cytoskeleton were visualized by a focal adhesion staining kit. The gene expression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and integrin subunits ITG-β1, ITG-β4, ITG-α4, ITG-α5, ITG-α6, was evaluated by qPCR. Cell proliferation/viability was slightly decreased by moderately rough surfaces, whereas no effect of surface material was observed. Cell morphology was strikingly different between differently treated surfaces: on machined surfaces, cells had elongated morphology and were attached along the grooves, whereas on moderately rough surfaces, cells were randomly attached. Surface roughness had a more pronounced effect on the gene expression compared to the surface material. The expression of FAK, α-SMA, ITG-β4, ITG-α5, and ITG-α6 was enhanced by moderately rough surfaces compared to smooth surfaces. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that the behavior of primary hGFs is primarily affected by surface structure, whereas no apparent advantage of Zr over Ti could be observed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8145850 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81458502021-05-26 Impact of Implant Surface Material and Microscale Roughness on the Initial Attachment and Proliferation of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts Rausch, Marco Aoqi Shokoohi-Tabrizi, Hassan Wehner, Christian Pippenger, Benjamin E. Wagner, Raphael S. Ulm, Christian Moritz, Andreas Chen, Jiang Andrukhov, Oleh Biology (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: In recent years, zirconia dental implant systems, also known as “ceramic implants”, became an alternative to the commonly used titanium implants. The clinical success of dental implants depends on several factors, particularly on the soft tissue formation around the implant abutment, but the implant surfaces, which at most support this process, are still to be found. In the present study, we cultured human gingival cells on surfaces that were made from either titanium or zirconia. These surfaces were differently treated and, subsequently, had different roughness: some surfaces were machined and smooth, whereas other surfaces were sand-blasted and rough. The cells ability to attach and grow was slightly decreased by rougher surfaces, whereas no effect of implant material was observed. Furthermore, the expression of some proteins mediating cell attachment to the surface was strongly affected by the roughness and only marginally by the implant material. We concluded that the behavior of gingival cells is primarily influenced by surface roughness, whereas no apparent advantage of either material could be observed. This suggests the importance of surface makeup in relation to how soft tissue healing around the implant is promoted and might provide new approaches for future research. ABSTRACT: Due to the rising demand for zirconia (Zr) based implant systems, it is important to understand the impact of Zr and titanium (Ti) implants and particularly their topography on soft tissue healing. As human gingival fibroblasts (hGFs) are the predominant cells in peri-implant soft tissue, we focused on examining the effect of implant material and surface roughness on hGFs’ initial attachment, growth and the expression of proteins involved in the focal adhesion. hGFs isolated from eight healthy donors were cultured on the following surfaces: smooth titanium machined surface (TiM), smooth zirconia machined surface (ZrM), moderately rough titanium surface (SLA), or moderately rough zirconia surface (ZLA) for up to 14 days. The initial attachment of hGFs was evaluated by scanning electron microscopy. Cell proliferation/viability was assessed by cell counting kit 8. Focal adhesion and cytoskeleton were visualized by a focal adhesion staining kit. The gene expression of focal adhesion kinase (FAK), α-smooth muscle actin (α-SMA), and integrin subunits ITG-β1, ITG-β4, ITG-α4, ITG-α5, ITG-α6, was evaluated by qPCR. Cell proliferation/viability was slightly decreased by moderately rough surfaces, whereas no effect of surface material was observed. Cell morphology was strikingly different between differently treated surfaces: on machined surfaces, cells had elongated morphology and were attached along the grooves, whereas on moderately rough surfaces, cells were randomly attached. Surface roughness had a more pronounced effect on the gene expression compared to the surface material. The expression of FAK, α-SMA, ITG-β4, ITG-α5, and ITG-α6 was enhanced by moderately rough surfaces compared to smooth surfaces. Within the limitations of this in vitro study, it can be concluded that the behavior of primary hGFs is primarily affected by surface structure, whereas no apparent advantage of Zr over Ti could be observed. MDPI 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8145850/ /pubmed/33922217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10050356 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Rausch, Marco Aoqi Shokoohi-Tabrizi, Hassan Wehner, Christian Pippenger, Benjamin E. Wagner, Raphael S. Ulm, Christian Moritz, Andreas Chen, Jiang Andrukhov, Oleh Impact of Implant Surface Material and Microscale Roughness on the Initial Attachment and Proliferation of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts |
title | Impact of Implant Surface Material and Microscale Roughness on the Initial Attachment and Proliferation of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts |
title_full | Impact of Implant Surface Material and Microscale Roughness on the Initial Attachment and Proliferation of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts |
title_fullStr | Impact of Implant Surface Material and Microscale Roughness on the Initial Attachment and Proliferation of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts |
title_full_unstemmed | Impact of Implant Surface Material and Microscale Roughness on the Initial Attachment and Proliferation of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts |
title_short | Impact of Implant Surface Material and Microscale Roughness on the Initial Attachment and Proliferation of Primary Human Gingival Fibroblasts |
title_sort | impact of implant surface material and microscale roughness on the initial attachment and proliferation of primary human gingival fibroblasts |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145850/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922217 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/biology10050356 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rauschmarcoaoqi impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts AT shokoohitabrizihassan impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts AT wehnerchristian impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts AT pippengerbenjamine impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts AT wagnerraphaels impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts AT ulmchristian impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts AT moritzandreas impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts AT chenjiang impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts AT andrukhovoleh impactofimplantsurfacematerialandmicroscaleroughnessontheinitialattachmentandproliferationofprimaryhumangingivalfibroblasts |