Cargando…

The Value of Low Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies

Background and Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) have become essential tools for prostate cancer evaluation. We evaluated the ability of PI-RADS scores in identifying significant prostate cancer, which would help avoid unnecessa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Dong-Soo, Moon, Sung-Kyoung, Lim, Joo-Won, Jeon, Seung-Hyun, Lee, Sang-Hyub
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050413
_version_ 1783697275945484288
author Kim, Dong-Soo
Moon, Sung-Kyoung
Lim, Joo-Won
Jeon, Seung-Hyun
Lee, Sang-Hyub
author_facet Kim, Dong-Soo
Moon, Sung-Kyoung
Lim, Joo-Won
Jeon, Seung-Hyun
Lee, Sang-Hyub
author_sort Kim, Dong-Soo
collection PubMed
description Background and Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) have become essential tools for prostate cancer evaluation. We evaluated the ability of PI-RADS scores in identifying significant prostate cancer, which would help avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies. Materials and Methods: Patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≤ 20 ng/mL, who underwent prostate MRI for evaluation from January 2018 to November 2019, were analyzed. Among them, 105 patients who received transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy were included. PSA, PI-RADS scores (low 1–2, high 3–5), biopsy results, and Gleason scores (GS) were evaluated. Biopsies with GS higher than 3 + 4 were considered as significant cancers and biopsies with no cancer or Gleason 3 + 3 were considered insignificant or no cancers. Results: Among the 105 patients, 45 patients had low PI-RADS and 60 had high PI-RADS scores. There were no patients with significant prostate cancer in the low PI-RADS groups. For the high PI-RADS group, 28 (46.7%) patients had significant cancer and 32 (53.3%) had insignificant or no cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of high PI-RADS to detect significant cancer was 100% and 58.4%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 46.7% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusions: Low PI-RADS scores on MRI did not show significant prostate cancer and surveillance should be considered in selected cases to prevent unnecessary invasive procedures and overdiagnosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8145899
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81458992021-05-26 The Value of Low Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies Kim, Dong-Soo Moon, Sung-Kyoung Lim, Joo-Won Jeon, Seung-Hyun Lee, Sang-Hyub Medicina (Kaunas) Article Background and Objectives: Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and the Prostate Imaging-Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) have become essential tools for prostate cancer evaluation. We evaluated the ability of PI-RADS scores in identifying significant prostate cancer, which would help avoid unnecessary prostate biopsies. Materials and Methods: Patients with prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels ≤ 20 ng/mL, who underwent prostate MRI for evaluation from January 2018 to November 2019, were analyzed. Among them, 105 patients who received transrectal ultrasonography (TRUS)-guided biopsy were included. PSA, PI-RADS scores (low 1–2, high 3–5), biopsy results, and Gleason scores (GS) were evaluated. Biopsies with GS higher than 3 + 4 were considered as significant cancers and biopsies with no cancer or Gleason 3 + 3 were considered insignificant or no cancers. Results: Among the 105 patients, 45 patients had low PI-RADS and 60 had high PI-RADS scores. There were no patients with significant prostate cancer in the low PI-RADS groups. For the high PI-RADS group, 28 (46.7%) patients had significant cancer and 32 (53.3%) had insignificant or no cancer. The sensitivity and specificity of high PI-RADS to detect significant cancer was 100% and 58.4%, respectively. Positive predictive value was 46.7% and negative predictive value was 100%. Conclusions: Low PI-RADS scores on MRI did not show significant prostate cancer and surveillance should be considered in selected cases to prevent unnecessary invasive procedures and overdiagnosis. MDPI 2021-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8145899/ /pubmed/33923251 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050413 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Dong-Soo
Moon, Sung-Kyoung
Lim, Joo-Won
Jeon, Seung-Hyun
Lee, Sang-Hyub
The Value of Low Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
title The Value of Low Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
title_full The Value of Low Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
title_fullStr The Value of Low Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
title_full_unstemmed The Value of Low Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
title_short The Value of Low Prostate Imaging—Reporting and Data System (PI-RADS) Scores in Preventing Unnecessary Prostate Biopsies
title_sort value of low prostate imaging—reporting and data system (pi-rads) scores in preventing unnecessary prostate biopsies
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8145899/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923251
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/medicina57050413
work_keys_str_mv AT kimdongsoo thevalueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT moonsungkyoung thevalueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT limjoowon thevalueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT jeonseunghyun thevalueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT leesanghyub thevalueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT kimdongsoo valueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT moonsungkyoung valueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT limjoowon valueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT jeonseunghyun valueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies
AT leesanghyub valueoflowprostateimagingreportinganddatasystempiradsscoresinpreventingunnecessaryprostatebiopsies