Cargando…

Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2

Extended community testing constitutes one of the main strategic pillars in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome on nasopharyngeal swab samples is currently the reference test. While displaying excellent analytical sensitivity and spec...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Renzoni, Adriana, Perez, Francisco, Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse, Yerly, Sabine, Boehm, Erik, Gayet-Ageron, Angèle, Kaiser, Laurent, Schibler, Manuel
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947153
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050813
_version_ 1783697398622584832
author Renzoni, Adriana
Perez, Francisco
Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse
Yerly, Sabine
Boehm, Erik
Gayet-Ageron, Angèle
Kaiser, Laurent
Schibler, Manuel
author_facet Renzoni, Adriana
Perez, Francisco
Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse
Yerly, Sabine
Boehm, Erik
Gayet-Ageron, Angèle
Kaiser, Laurent
Schibler, Manuel
author_sort Renzoni, Adriana
collection PubMed
description Extended community testing constitutes one of the main strategic pillars in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome on nasopharyngeal swab samples is currently the reference test. While displaying excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity, this test is costly, often requires a substantial turnaround time, and, more importantly, is subject to reagent and other material shortages. To complement this technology, rapid antigen tests have been developed and made available worldwide, allowing cheap, quick, and decentralized SARS-CoV-2 testing. The main drawback of these tests is the reduced sensitivity when RT-PCR is the gold standard. In this study, we evaluate Visby an innovative, portable, easy-to-use RT-PCR point-of-care (POC) diagnostic device. Our retrospective analysis shows that overall, compared to the Cobas 6800 RT-qPCR assay (Roche), this RT-PCR POC technology detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA with 95% sensitivity (95%CI = 86.3–99%) and 100% specificity (95% CI = 80.5–100%). For samples with cycle-threshold values below 31, we observed 100% sensitivity (95% CI = 66.4–100%). While showing an analytical sensitivity slightly below that of a standard RT-qPCR system, the evaluated Visby RT-PCR POC device may prove to be an interesting diagnostic alternative in the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially combining the practical advantages of rapid antigen tests and the robust analytical performances of nucleic acid detection systems.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8146445
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81464452021-05-26 Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Renzoni, Adriana Perez, Francisco Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse Yerly, Sabine Boehm, Erik Gayet-Ageron, Angèle Kaiser, Laurent Schibler, Manuel Diagnostics (Basel) Brief Report Extended community testing constitutes one of the main strategic pillars in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome on nasopharyngeal swab samples is currently the reference test. While displaying excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity, this test is costly, often requires a substantial turnaround time, and, more importantly, is subject to reagent and other material shortages. To complement this technology, rapid antigen tests have been developed and made available worldwide, allowing cheap, quick, and decentralized SARS-CoV-2 testing. The main drawback of these tests is the reduced sensitivity when RT-PCR is the gold standard. In this study, we evaluate Visby an innovative, portable, easy-to-use RT-PCR point-of-care (POC) diagnostic device. Our retrospective analysis shows that overall, compared to the Cobas 6800 RT-qPCR assay (Roche), this RT-PCR POC technology detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA with 95% sensitivity (95%CI = 86.3–99%) and 100% specificity (95% CI = 80.5–100%). For samples with cycle-threshold values below 31, we observed 100% sensitivity (95% CI = 66.4–100%). While showing an analytical sensitivity slightly below that of a standard RT-qPCR system, the evaluated Visby RT-PCR POC device may prove to be an interesting diagnostic alternative in the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially combining the practical advantages of rapid antigen tests and the robust analytical performances of nucleic acid detection systems. MDPI 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8146445/ /pubmed/33947153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050813 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Brief Report
Renzoni, Adriana
Perez, Francisco
Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse
Yerly, Sabine
Boehm, Erik
Gayet-Ageron, Angèle
Kaiser, Laurent
Schibler, Manuel
Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_fullStr Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_full_unstemmed Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_short Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
title_sort analytical evaluation of visby medical rt-pcr portable device for rapid detection of sars-cov-2
topic Brief Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146445/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947153
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050813
work_keys_str_mv AT renzoniadriana analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2
AT perezfrancisco analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2
AT ngonsogamarietherese analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2
AT yerlysabine analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2
AT boehmerik analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2
AT gayetageronangele analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2
AT kaiserlaurent analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2
AT schiblermanuel analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2