Cargando…
Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2
Extended community testing constitutes one of the main strategic pillars in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome on nasopharyngeal swab samples is currently the reference test. While displaying excellent analytical sensitivity and spec...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050813 |
_version_ | 1783697398622584832 |
---|---|
author | Renzoni, Adriana Perez, Francisco Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse Yerly, Sabine Boehm, Erik Gayet-Ageron, Angèle Kaiser, Laurent Schibler, Manuel |
author_facet | Renzoni, Adriana Perez, Francisco Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse Yerly, Sabine Boehm, Erik Gayet-Ageron, Angèle Kaiser, Laurent Schibler, Manuel |
author_sort | Renzoni, Adriana |
collection | PubMed |
description | Extended community testing constitutes one of the main strategic pillars in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome on nasopharyngeal swab samples is currently the reference test. While displaying excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity, this test is costly, often requires a substantial turnaround time, and, more importantly, is subject to reagent and other material shortages. To complement this technology, rapid antigen tests have been developed and made available worldwide, allowing cheap, quick, and decentralized SARS-CoV-2 testing. The main drawback of these tests is the reduced sensitivity when RT-PCR is the gold standard. In this study, we evaluate Visby an innovative, portable, easy-to-use RT-PCR point-of-care (POC) diagnostic device. Our retrospective analysis shows that overall, compared to the Cobas 6800 RT-qPCR assay (Roche), this RT-PCR POC technology detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA with 95% sensitivity (95%CI = 86.3–99%) and 100% specificity (95% CI = 80.5–100%). For samples with cycle-threshold values below 31, we observed 100% sensitivity (95% CI = 66.4–100%). While showing an analytical sensitivity slightly below that of a standard RT-qPCR system, the evaluated Visby RT-PCR POC device may prove to be an interesting diagnostic alternative in the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially combining the practical advantages of rapid antigen tests and the robust analytical performances of nucleic acid detection systems. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8146445 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81464452021-05-26 Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 Renzoni, Adriana Perez, Francisco Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse Yerly, Sabine Boehm, Erik Gayet-Ageron, Angèle Kaiser, Laurent Schibler, Manuel Diagnostics (Basel) Brief Report Extended community testing constitutes one of the main strategic pillars in controlling the COVID-19 pandemic. Reverse transcription PCR (RT-PCR) targeting the SARS-CoV-2 genome on nasopharyngeal swab samples is currently the reference test. While displaying excellent analytical sensitivity and specificity, this test is costly, often requires a substantial turnaround time, and, more importantly, is subject to reagent and other material shortages. To complement this technology, rapid antigen tests have been developed and made available worldwide, allowing cheap, quick, and decentralized SARS-CoV-2 testing. The main drawback of these tests is the reduced sensitivity when RT-PCR is the gold standard. In this study, we evaluate Visby an innovative, portable, easy-to-use RT-PCR point-of-care (POC) diagnostic device. Our retrospective analysis shows that overall, compared to the Cobas 6800 RT-qPCR assay (Roche), this RT-PCR POC technology detects SARS-CoV-2 RNA with 95% sensitivity (95%CI = 86.3–99%) and 100% specificity (95% CI = 80.5–100%). For samples with cycle-threshold values below 31, we observed 100% sensitivity (95% CI = 66.4–100%). While showing an analytical sensitivity slightly below that of a standard RT-qPCR system, the evaluated Visby RT-PCR POC device may prove to be an interesting diagnostic alternative in the COVID-19 pandemic, potentially combining the practical advantages of rapid antigen tests and the robust analytical performances of nucleic acid detection systems. MDPI 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8146445/ /pubmed/33947153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050813 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Brief Report Renzoni, Adriana Perez, Francisco Ngo Nsoga, Marie Thérèse Yerly, Sabine Boehm, Erik Gayet-Ageron, Angèle Kaiser, Laurent Schibler, Manuel Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title | Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full | Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_fullStr | Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_full_unstemmed | Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_short | Analytical Evaluation of Visby Medical RT-PCR Portable Device for Rapid Detection of SARS-CoV-2 |
title_sort | analytical evaluation of visby medical rt-pcr portable device for rapid detection of sars-cov-2 |
topic | Brief Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146445/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33947153 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050813 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT renzoniadriana analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2 AT perezfrancisco analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2 AT ngonsogamarietherese analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2 AT yerlysabine analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2 AT boehmerik analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2 AT gayetageronangele analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2 AT kaiserlaurent analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2 AT schiblermanuel analyticalevaluationofvisbymedicalrtpcrportabledeviceforrapiddetectionofsarscov2 |