Cargando…

Imaging of Canine Neoplastic Reproductive Disorders

SIMPLE SUMMARY: The diagnosis of canine reproductive neoplasia remains challenging as none of the routinely performed diagnostic methods appear to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity. In recent years, advanced imaging techniques have been successfully performed in small animals; however, even...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Russo, Marco, England, Gary C.W., Catone, Giuseppe, Marino, Gabriele
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051213
_version_ 1783697408252706816
author Russo, Marco
England, Gary C.W.
Catone, Giuseppe
Marino, Gabriele
author_facet Russo, Marco
England, Gary C.W.
Catone, Giuseppe
Marino, Gabriele
author_sort Russo, Marco
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: The diagnosis of canine reproductive neoplasia remains challenging as none of the routinely performed diagnostic methods appear to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity. In recent years, advanced imaging techniques have been successfully performed in small animals; however, even though the incidence of reproductive neoplasia is high, no data are available on the performance of these techniques. This review evaluates the applicability of various diagnostic imaging modalities in dogs and describes the findings and specific patterns that may characterise different tumour types. Lamentably, some of the advanced imaging techniques have not yet been adopted as first-line diagnostic tools, although it is clear that in the future they will become important methods for the detection of male and female reproductive neoplasia. ABSTRACT: Diagnostic imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis and management of reproductive neoplasia in dogs and cats. The initial diagnosis, staging, and planning of surgical and radiation treatment and the response to therapy all involve imaging to varying degrees. Routine radiographs, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, and cross-sectional imaging in the form of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routinely used in canine reproductive disorders. The choice of imaging modality depends on many factors, including the level of referral and the pathological information required. The biological behaviour of the tumour also guides the choice of imaging in cancer staging, and imaging may play an important role in guiding serial tumour biopsy during the course of therapy. The sophistication of imaging modalities is increasing exponentially. Each modality has advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost, availability, sensitivity, specificity, and qualities of anatomic versus functional imaging.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8146485
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81464852021-05-26 Imaging of Canine Neoplastic Reproductive Disorders Russo, Marco England, Gary C.W. Catone, Giuseppe Marino, Gabriele Animals (Basel) Review SIMPLE SUMMARY: The diagnosis of canine reproductive neoplasia remains challenging as none of the routinely performed diagnostic methods appear to have sufficient sensitivity or specificity. In recent years, advanced imaging techniques have been successfully performed in small animals; however, even though the incidence of reproductive neoplasia is high, no data are available on the performance of these techniques. This review evaluates the applicability of various diagnostic imaging modalities in dogs and describes the findings and specific patterns that may characterise different tumour types. Lamentably, some of the advanced imaging techniques have not yet been adopted as first-line diagnostic tools, although it is clear that in the future they will become important methods for the detection of male and female reproductive neoplasia. ABSTRACT: Diagnostic imaging plays an essential role in the diagnosis and management of reproductive neoplasia in dogs and cats. The initial diagnosis, staging, and planning of surgical and radiation treatment and the response to therapy all involve imaging to varying degrees. Routine radiographs, ultrasound, nuclear medicine, and cross-sectional imaging in the form of computed tomography (CT) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) are routinely used in canine reproductive disorders. The choice of imaging modality depends on many factors, including the level of referral and the pathological information required. The biological behaviour of the tumour also guides the choice of imaging in cancer staging, and imaging may play an important role in guiding serial tumour biopsy during the course of therapy. The sophistication of imaging modalities is increasing exponentially. Each modality has advantages and disadvantages in terms of cost, availability, sensitivity, specificity, and qualities of anatomic versus functional imaging. MDPI 2021-04-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8146485/ /pubmed/33922348 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051213 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Russo, Marco
England, Gary C.W.
Catone, Giuseppe
Marino, Gabriele
Imaging of Canine Neoplastic Reproductive Disorders
title Imaging of Canine Neoplastic Reproductive Disorders
title_full Imaging of Canine Neoplastic Reproductive Disorders
title_fullStr Imaging of Canine Neoplastic Reproductive Disorders
title_full_unstemmed Imaging of Canine Neoplastic Reproductive Disorders
title_short Imaging of Canine Neoplastic Reproductive Disorders
title_sort imaging of canine neoplastic reproductive disorders
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146485/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922348
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ani11051213
work_keys_str_mv AT russomarco imagingofcanineneoplasticreproductivedisorders
AT englandgarycw imagingofcanineneoplasticreproductivedisorders
AT catonegiuseppe imagingofcanineneoplasticreproductivedisorders
AT marinogabriele imagingofcanineneoplasticreproductivedisorders