Cargando…

Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization

The twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) protocol and its variations have been proposed to overcome the linear Pirandola–Laurenza–Ottaviani–Banchi (PLOB) bound. One variation called phase-matching QKD (PM-QKD) protocol employs discrete phase randomization and the phase post-compensation tech...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Xiaoxu, Wang, Yang, Jiang, Musheng, Lu, Yifei, Li, Hongwei, Zhou, Chun, Bao, Wansu
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922572
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23050508
_version_ 1783697436442624000
author Zhang, Xiaoxu
Wang, Yang
Jiang, Musheng
Lu, Yifei
Li, Hongwei
Zhou, Chun
Bao, Wansu
author_facet Zhang, Xiaoxu
Wang, Yang
Jiang, Musheng
Lu, Yifei
Li, Hongwei
Zhou, Chun
Bao, Wansu
author_sort Zhang, Xiaoxu
collection PubMed
description The twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) protocol and its variations have been proposed to overcome the linear Pirandola–Laurenza–Ottaviani–Banchi (PLOB) bound. One variation called phase-matching QKD (PM-QKD) protocol employs discrete phase randomization and the phase post-compensation technique to improve the key rate quadratically. However, the discrete phase randomization opens a loophole to threaten the actual security. In this paper, we first introduce the unambiguous state discrimination (USD) measurement and the photon-number-splitting (PNS) attack against PM-QKD with imperfect phase randomization. Then, we prove the rigorous security of decoy state PM-QKD with discrete phase randomization. Simulation results show that, considering the intrinsic bit error rate and sifting factor, there is an optimal discrete phase randomization value to guarantee security and performance. Furthermore, as the number of discrete phase randomization increases, the key rate of adopting vacuum and one decoy state approaches infinite decoy states, the key rate between discrete phase randomization and continuous phase randomization is almost the same.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8146613
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81466132021-05-26 Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization Zhang, Xiaoxu Wang, Yang Jiang, Musheng Lu, Yifei Li, Hongwei Zhou, Chun Bao, Wansu Entropy (Basel) Article The twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) protocol and its variations have been proposed to overcome the linear Pirandola–Laurenza–Ottaviani–Banchi (PLOB) bound. One variation called phase-matching QKD (PM-QKD) protocol employs discrete phase randomization and the phase post-compensation technique to improve the key rate quadratically. However, the discrete phase randomization opens a loophole to threaten the actual security. In this paper, we first introduce the unambiguous state discrimination (USD) measurement and the photon-number-splitting (PNS) attack against PM-QKD with imperfect phase randomization. Then, we prove the rigorous security of decoy state PM-QKD with discrete phase randomization. Simulation results show that, considering the intrinsic bit error rate and sifting factor, there is an optimal discrete phase randomization value to guarantee security and performance. Furthermore, as the number of discrete phase randomization increases, the key rate of adopting vacuum and one decoy state approaches infinite decoy states, the key rate between discrete phase randomization and continuous phase randomization is almost the same. MDPI 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8146613/ /pubmed/33922572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23050508 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Zhang, Xiaoxu
Wang, Yang
Jiang, Musheng
Lu, Yifei
Li, Hongwei
Zhou, Chun
Bao, Wansu
Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization
title Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization
title_full Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization
title_fullStr Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization
title_full_unstemmed Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization
title_short Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization
title_sort phase-matching quantum key distribution with discrete phase randomization
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146613/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922572
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23050508
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangxiaoxu phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization
AT wangyang phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization
AT jiangmusheng phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization
AT luyifei phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization
AT lihongwei phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization
AT zhouchun phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization
AT baowansu phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization