Cargando…
Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization
The twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) protocol and its variations have been proposed to overcome the linear Pirandola–Laurenza–Ottaviani–Banchi (PLOB) bound. One variation called phase-matching QKD (PM-QKD) protocol employs discrete phase randomization and the phase post-compensation tech...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23050508 |
_version_ | 1783697436442624000 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Xiaoxu Wang, Yang Jiang, Musheng Lu, Yifei Li, Hongwei Zhou, Chun Bao, Wansu |
author_facet | Zhang, Xiaoxu Wang, Yang Jiang, Musheng Lu, Yifei Li, Hongwei Zhou, Chun Bao, Wansu |
author_sort | Zhang, Xiaoxu |
collection | PubMed |
description | The twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) protocol and its variations have been proposed to overcome the linear Pirandola–Laurenza–Ottaviani–Banchi (PLOB) bound. One variation called phase-matching QKD (PM-QKD) protocol employs discrete phase randomization and the phase post-compensation technique to improve the key rate quadratically. However, the discrete phase randomization opens a loophole to threaten the actual security. In this paper, we first introduce the unambiguous state discrimination (USD) measurement and the photon-number-splitting (PNS) attack against PM-QKD with imperfect phase randomization. Then, we prove the rigorous security of decoy state PM-QKD with discrete phase randomization. Simulation results show that, considering the intrinsic bit error rate and sifting factor, there is an optimal discrete phase randomization value to guarantee security and performance. Furthermore, as the number of discrete phase randomization increases, the key rate of adopting vacuum and one decoy state approaches infinite decoy states, the key rate between discrete phase randomization and continuous phase randomization is almost the same. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8146613 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81466132021-05-26 Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization Zhang, Xiaoxu Wang, Yang Jiang, Musheng Lu, Yifei Li, Hongwei Zhou, Chun Bao, Wansu Entropy (Basel) Article The twin-field quantum key distribution (TF-QKD) protocol and its variations have been proposed to overcome the linear Pirandola–Laurenza–Ottaviani–Banchi (PLOB) bound. One variation called phase-matching QKD (PM-QKD) protocol employs discrete phase randomization and the phase post-compensation technique to improve the key rate quadratically. However, the discrete phase randomization opens a loophole to threaten the actual security. In this paper, we first introduce the unambiguous state discrimination (USD) measurement and the photon-number-splitting (PNS) attack against PM-QKD with imperfect phase randomization. Then, we prove the rigorous security of decoy state PM-QKD with discrete phase randomization. Simulation results show that, considering the intrinsic bit error rate and sifting factor, there is an optimal discrete phase randomization value to guarantee security and performance. Furthermore, as the number of discrete phase randomization increases, the key rate of adopting vacuum and one decoy state approaches infinite decoy states, the key rate between discrete phase randomization and continuous phase randomization is almost the same. MDPI 2021-04-23 /pmc/articles/PMC8146613/ /pubmed/33922572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23050508 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Zhang, Xiaoxu Wang, Yang Jiang, Musheng Lu, Yifei Li, Hongwei Zhou, Chun Bao, Wansu Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization |
title | Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization |
title_full | Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization |
title_fullStr | Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization |
title_full_unstemmed | Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization |
title_short | Phase-Matching Quantum Key Distribution with Discrete Phase Randomization |
title_sort | phase-matching quantum key distribution with discrete phase randomization |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146613/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33922572 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/e23050508 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangxiaoxu phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization AT wangyang phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization AT jiangmusheng phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization AT luyifei phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization AT lihongwei phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization AT zhouchun phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization AT baowansu phasematchingquantumkeydistributionwithdiscretephaserandomization |