Cargando…

Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes

Sulfate reducing prokaryotes (SRP) are a phylogenetically and physiologically diverse group of microorganisms that use sulfate as an electron acceptor. SRP have long been recognized as key players of the carbon and sulfur cycles, and more recently, they have been identified to play a relevant role a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Orellana, Roberto, Arancibia, Alejandra, Badilla, Leonardo, Acosta, Jonathan, Arancibia, Gabriela, Escar, Rodrigo, Ferrada, Gustavo, Seeger, Michael
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050931
_version_ 1783697459215597568
author Orellana, Roberto
Arancibia, Alejandra
Badilla, Leonardo
Acosta, Jonathan
Arancibia, Gabriela
Escar, Rodrigo
Ferrada, Gustavo
Seeger, Michael
author_facet Orellana, Roberto
Arancibia, Alejandra
Badilla, Leonardo
Acosta, Jonathan
Arancibia, Gabriela
Escar, Rodrigo
Ferrada, Gustavo
Seeger, Michael
author_sort Orellana, Roberto
collection PubMed
description Sulfate reducing prokaryotes (SRP) are a phylogenetically and physiologically diverse group of microorganisms that use sulfate as an electron acceptor. SRP have long been recognized as key players of the carbon and sulfur cycles, and more recently, they have been identified to play a relevant role as part of syntrophic and symbiotic relations and the human microbiome. Despite their environmental relevance, there is a poor understanding about the prevalence of prophages and CRISPR arrays and how their distribution and dynamic affect the ecological role of SRP. We addressed this question by analyzing the results of a comprehensive survey of prophages and CRISPR in a total of 91 genomes of SRP with several genotypic, phenotypic, and physiological traits, including genome size, cell volume, minimum doubling time, cell wall, and habitat, among others. Our analysis discovered 81 prophages in 51 strains, representing the 56% of the total evaluated strains. Prophages are non-uniformly distributed across the SRP phylogeny, where prophage-rich lineages belonged to Desulfovibrionaceae and Peptococcaceae. Furthermore, our study found 160 CRISPR arrays in 71 SRP, which is more abundant and widely spread than previously expected. Although there is no correlation between presence and abundance of prophages and CRISPR arrays at the strain level, our analysis showed that there is a directly proportional relation between cellular volumes and number of prophages per cell. This result suggests that there is an additional selective pressure for strains with smaller cells to get rid of foreign DNA, such as prophages, but not CRISPR, due to less availability of cellular resources. Analysis of the prophage genes encoding viral structural proteins reported that 44% of SRP prophages are classified as Myoviridae, and comparative analysis showed high level of homology, but not synteny, among prophages belonging to the Family Desulfovibrionaceae. We further recovered viral-like particles and structures that resemble outer membrane vesicles from D. vulgaris str. Hildenborough. The results of this study improved the current understanding of dynamic interactions between prophages and CRISPR with their hosts in both cultured and hitherto-uncultured SRP strains, and how their distribution affects the microbial community dynamics in several sulfidogenic natural and engineered environments.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8146710
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81467102021-05-26 Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes Orellana, Roberto Arancibia, Alejandra Badilla, Leonardo Acosta, Jonathan Arancibia, Gabriela Escar, Rodrigo Ferrada, Gustavo Seeger, Michael Microorganisms Article Sulfate reducing prokaryotes (SRP) are a phylogenetically and physiologically diverse group of microorganisms that use sulfate as an electron acceptor. SRP have long been recognized as key players of the carbon and sulfur cycles, and more recently, they have been identified to play a relevant role as part of syntrophic and symbiotic relations and the human microbiome. Despite their environmental relevance, there is a poor understanding about the prevalence of prophages and CRISPR arrays and how their distribution and dynamic affect the ecological role of SRP. We addressed this question by analyzing the results of a comprehensive survey of prophages and CRISPR in a total of 91 genomes of SRP with several genotypic, phenotypic, and physiological traits, including genome size, cell volume, minimum doubling time, cell wall, and habitat, among others. Our analysis discovered 81 prophages in 51 strains, representing the 56% of the total evaluated strains. Prophages are non-uniformly distributed across the SRP phylogeny, where prophage-rich lineages belonged to Desulfovibrionaceae and Peptococcaceae. Furthermore, our study found 160 CRISPR arrays in 71 SRP, which is more abundant and widely spread than previously expected. Although there is no correlation between presence and abundance of prophages and CRISPR arrays at the strain level, our analysis showed that there is a directly proportional relation between cellular volumes and number of prophages per cell. This result suggests that there is an additional selective pressure for strains with smaller cells to get rid of foreign DNA, such as prophages, but not CRISPR, due to less availability of cellular resources. Analysis of the prophage genes encoding viral structural proteins reported that 44% of SRP prophages are classified as Myoviridae, and comparative analysis showed high level of homology, but not synteny, among prophages belonging to the Family Desulfovibrionaceae. We further recovered viral-like particles and structures that resemble outer membrane vesicles from D. vulgaris str. Hildenborough. The results of this study improved the current understanding of dynamic interactions between prophages and CRISPR with their hosts in both cultured and hitherto-uncultured SRP strains, and how their distribution affects the microbial community dynamics in several sulfidogenic natural and engineered environments. MDPI 2021-04-27 /pmc/articles/PMC8146710/ /pubmed/33925267 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050931 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Orellana, Roberto
Arancibia, Alejandra
Badilla, Leonardo
Acosta, Jonathan
Arancibia, Gabriela
Escar, Rodrigo
Ferrada, Gustavo
Seeger, Michael
Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes
title Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes
title_full Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes
title_fullStr Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes
title_full_unstemmed Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes
title_short Ecophysiological Features Shape the Distribution of Prophages and CRISPR in Sulfate Reducing Prokaryotes
title_sort ecophysiological features shape the distribution of prophages and crispr in sulfate reducing prokaryotes
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146710/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33925267
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/microorganisms9050931
work_keys_str_mv AT orellanaroberto ecophysiologicalfeaturesshapethedistributionofprophagesandcrisprinsulfatereducingprokaryotes
AT arancibiaalejandra ecophysiologicalfeaturesshapethedistributionofprophagesandcrisprinsulfatereducingprokaryotes
AT badillaleonardo ecophysiologicalfeaturesshapethedistributionofprophagesandcrisprinsulfatereducingprokaryotes
AT acostajonathan ecophysiologicalfeaturesshapethedistributionofprophagesandcrisprinsulfatereducingprokaryotes
AT arancibiagabriela ecophysiologicalfeaturesshapethedistributionofprophagesandcrisprinsulfatereducingprokaryotes
AT escarrodrigo ecophysiologicalfeaturesshapethedistributionofprophagesandcrisprinsulfatereducingprokaryotes
AT ferradagustavo ecophysiologicalfeaturesshapethedistributionofprophagesandcrisprinsulfatereducingprokaryotes
AT seegermichael ecophysiologicalfeaturesshapethedistributionofprophagesandcrisprinsulfatereducingprokaryotes