Cargando…
Modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review
Cassava is an important crop in the developing world. The goal of this study was to review published cassava models (18) for their capability to simulate storage root biomass and to categorize them into static and dynamic models. The majority (14) are dynamic and capture within season growth dynamic...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108140 |
_version_ | 1783697461873737728 |
---|---|
author | Moreno-Cadena, Patricia Hoogenboom, Gerrit Cock, James H. Ramirez-Villegas, Julian Pypers, Pieter Kreye, Christine Tariku, Meklit Ezui, Kodjovi Senam Becerra Lopez-Lavalle, Luis Augusto Asseng, Senthold |
author_facet | Moreno-Cadena, Patricia Hoogenboom, Gerrit Cock, James H. Ramirez-Villegas, Julian Pypers, Pieter Kreye, Christine Tariku, Meklit Ezui, Kodjovi Senam Becerra Lopez-Lavalle, Luis Augusto Asseng, Senthold |
author_sort | Moreno-Cadena, Patricia |
collection | PubMed |
description | Cassava is an important crop in the developing world. The goal of this study was to review published cassava models (18) for their capability to simulate storage root biomass and to categorize them into static and dynamic models. The majority (14) are dynamic and capture within season growth dynamics. Most (13) of the dynamic models consider environmental factors such as temperature, solar radiation, soil water and nutrient restrictions. More than half (10) have been calibrated for a distinct genotype. Only one of the four static models includes environmental variables. While the static regression models are useful to estimate final yield, their application is limited to the locations or varieties used for their development unless recalibrated for distinct conditions. Dynamic models simulate growth process and provide estimates of yield over time with, in most cases, no fixed maturity date. The dynamic models that simulate the detailed development of nodal units tend to be less accurate in determining final yield compared to the simpler dynamic and statistic models. However, they can be more safely applied to novel environmental conditions that can be explored in silico. Deficiencies in the current models are highlighted including suggestions on how they can be improved. None of the current dynamic cassava models adequately simulates the starch content of fresh cassava roots with almost all models based on dry biomass simulations. Further studies are necessary to develop a new module for existing cassava models to simulate cassava quality. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8146721 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81467212021-06-15 Modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review Moreno-Cadena, Patricia Hoogenboom, Gerrit Cock, James H. Ramirez-Villegas, Julian Pypers, Pieter Kreye, Christine Tariku, Meklit Ezui, Kodjovi Senam Becerra Lopez-Lavalle, Luis Augusto Asseng, Senthold Field Crops Res Article Cassava is an important crop in the developing world. The goal of this study was to review published cassava models (18) for their capability to simulate storage root biomass and to categorize them into static and dynamic models. The majority (14) are dynamic and capture within season growth dynamics. Most (13) of the dynamic models consider environmental factors such as temperature, solar radiation, soil water and nutrient restrictions. More than half (10) have been calibrated for a distinct genotype. Only one of the four static models includes environmental variables. While the static regression models are useful to estimate final yield, their application is limited to the locations or varieties used for their development unless recalibrated for distinct conditions. Dynamic models simulate growth process and provide estimates of yield over time with, in most cases, no fixed maturity date. The dynamic models that simulate the detailed development of nodal units tend to be less accurate in determining final yield compared to the simpler dynamic and statistic models. However, they can be more safely applied to novel environmental conditions that can be explored in silico. Deficiencies in the current models are highlighted including suggestions on how they can be improved. None of the current dynamic cassava models adequately simulates the starch content of fresh cassava roots with almost all models based on dry biomass simulations. Further studies are necessary to develop a new module for existing cassava models to simulate cassava quality. Elsevier Scientific Pub. Co 2021-06-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8146721/ /pubmed/34140751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108140 Text en © 2021 The Authors https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Moreno-Cadena, Patricia Hoogenboom, Gerrit Cock, James H. Ramirez-Villegas, Julian Pypers, Pieter Kreye, Christine Tariku, Meklit Ezui, Kodjovi Senam Becerra Lopez-Lavalle, Luis Augusto Asseng, Senthold Modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review |
title | Modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review |
title_full | Modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review |
title_fullStr | Modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review |
title_full_unstemmed | Modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review |
title_short | Modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: A review |
title_sort | modeling growth, development and yield of cassava: a review |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146721/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34140751 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2021.108140 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT morenocadenapatricia modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT hoogenboomgerrit modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT cockjamesh modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT ramirezvillegasjulian modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT pyperspieter modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT kreyechristine modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT tarikumeklit modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT ezuikodjovisenam modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT becerralopezlavalleluisaugusto modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview AT assengsenthold modelinggrowthdevelopmentandyieldofcassavaareview |