Cargando…

Intradermal Testing Doubles Identification of Allergy among 110 Immunotherapy-Responsive Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction

The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sensitivity advantage of intradermal dilutional testing (IDT) is clinically relevant in patients with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) or otitis media with effusion (OME). This retrospective, private-practice cohort study compared t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hurst, David S., Gordon, Bruce R., McDaniel, Alan B., Poe, Dennis S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050763
_version_ 1783697466027147264
author Hurst, David S.
Gordon, Bruce R.
McDaniel, Alan B.
Poe, Dennis S.
author_facet Hurst, David S.
Gordon, Bruce R.
McDaniel, Alan B.
Poe, Dennis S.
author_sort Hurst, David S.
collection PubMed
description The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sensitivity advantage of intradermal dilutional testing (IDT) is clinically relevant in patients with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) or otitis media with effusion (OME). This retrospective, private-practice cohort study compared the sensitivity of skin prick tests (SPT) vs. IDT in 110 adults and children with suspected allergy and OME. Primary outcome measure was symptom resolution from allergy immunotherapy (AIT). IDT identified 57% more patients as being allergic, and 8.6 times more reactive allergens than would have been diagnosed using only SPT. Patients diagnosed by IDT had the same degree of symptom improvement from immunotherapy, independent of allergen sensitivity (66% by SPT vs. 63% by IDT; p = 0.69, not different). Low-sensitivity allergy tests, which may fail to identify allergy in over two thirds of children aged 3 to 15 as being atopic, or among 60% of patients with ETD, may explain why many physicians do not consider allergy as a treatable etiology for their patient’s OME/ETD. IDT offers superior sensitivity over SPT for detecting allergens clinically relevant to treating OME/ETD. These data strongly support increased utilization of intradermal testing and invite additional clinical outcome studies.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8146738
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81467382021-05-26 Intradermal Testing Doubles Identification of Allergy among 110 Immunotherapy-Responsive Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction Hurst, David S. Gordon, Bruce R. McDaniel, Alan B. Poe, Dennis S. Diagnostics (Basel) Article The purpose of this study was to determine whether the sensitivity advantage of intradermal dilutional testing (IDT) is clinically relevant in patients with obstructive Eustachian tube dysfunction (ETD) or otitis media with effusion (OME). This retrospective, private-practice cohort study compared the sensitivity of skin prick tests (SPT) vs. IDT in 110 adults and children with suspected allergy and OME. Primary outcome measure was symptom resolution from allergy immunotherapy (AIT). IDT identified 57% more patients as being allergic, and 8.6 times more reactive allergens than would have been diagnosed using only SPT. Patients diagnosed by IDT had the same degree of symptom improvement from immunotherapy, independent of allergen sensitivity (66% by SPT vs. 63% by IDT; p = 0.69, not different). Low-sensitivity allergy tests, which may fail to identify allergy in over two thirds of children aged 3 to 15 as being atopic, or among 60% of patients with ETD, may explain why many physicians do not consider allergy as a treatable etiology for their patient’s OME/ETD. IDT offers superior sensitivity over SPT for detecting allergens clinically relevant to treating OME/ETD. These data strongly support increased utilization of intradermal testing and invite additional clinical outcome studies. MDPI 2021-04-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8146738/ /pubmed/33923133 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050763 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hurst, David S.
Gordon, Bruce R.
McDaniel, Alan B.
Poe, Dennis S.
Intradermal Testing Doubles Identification of Allergy among 110 Immunotherapy-Responsive Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
title Intradermal Testing Doubles Identification of Allergy among 110 Immunotherapy-Responsive Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
title_full Intradermal Testing Doubles Identification of Allergy among 110 Immunotherapy-Responsive Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
title_fullStr Intradermal Testing Doubles Identification of Allergy among 110 Immunotherapy-Responsive Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
title_full_unstemmed Intradermal Testing Doubles Identification of Allergy among 110 Immunotherapy-Responsive Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
title_short Intradermal Testing Doubles Identification of Allergy among 110 Immunotherapy-Responsive Patients with Eustachian Tube Dysfunction
title_sort intradermal testing doubles identification of allergy among 110 immunotherapy-responsive patients with eustachian tube dysfunction
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146738/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33923133
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050763
work_keys_str_mv AT hurstdavids intradermaltestingdoublesidentificationofallergyamong110immunotherapyresponsivepatientswitheustachiantubedysfunction
AT gordonbrucer intradermaltestingdoublesidentificationofallergyamong110immunotherapyresponsivepatientswitheustachiantubedysfunction
AT mcdanielalanb intradermaltestingdoublesidentificationofallergyamong110immunotherapyresponsivepatientswitheustachiantubedysfunction
AT poedenniss intradermaltestingdoublesidentificationofallergyamong110immunotherapyresponsivepatientswitheustachiantubedysfunction