Cargando…

MYD88(L265P) Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation

In IgM monoclonal gammopathies MYD88(L265P) is a prognostic and predictive biomarker of therapy response. MYD88(L265P) detection is mainly performed by allele-specific quantitative PCR (ASqPCR), however recently, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been proved to be suitable for MYD88(L265P) screening a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrante, Martina, Furlan, Daniela, Zibellini, Silvia, Borriero, Michela, Candido, Chiara, Sahnane, Nora, Uccella, Silvia, Genuardi, Elisa, Alessandria, Beatrice, Bianchi, Benedetta, Mora, Barbara, Grimaldi, Daniele, Defrancesco, Irene, Jiménez, Cristina, Cavallo, Federica, Ferrero, Dario, Dogliotti, Irene, Merli, Michele, Varettoni, Marzia, Ferrero, Simone, Drandi, Daniela
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050779
_version_ 1783697523235356672
author Ferrante, Martina
Furlan, Daniela
Zibellini, Silvia
Borriero, Michela
Candido, Chiara
Sahnane, Nora
Uccella, Silvia
Genuardi, Elisa
Alessandria, Beatrice
Bianchi, Benedetta
Mora, Barbara
Grimaldi, Daniele
Defrancesco, Irene
Jiménez, Cristina
Cavallo, Federica
Ferrero, Dario
Dogliotti, Irene
Merli, Michele
Varettoni, Marzia
Ferrero, Simone
Drandi, Daniela
author_facet Ferrante, Martina
Furlan, Daniela
Zibellini, Silvia
Borriero, Michela
Candido, Chiara
Sahnane, Nora
Uccella, Silvia
Genuardi, Elisa
Alessandria, Beatrice
Bianchi, Benedetta
Mora, Barbara
Grimaldi, Daniele
Defrancesco, Irene
Jiménez, Cristina
Cavallo, Federica
Ferrero, Dario
Dogliotti, Irene
Merli, Michele
Varettoni, Marzia
Ferrero, Simone
Drandi, Daniela
author_sort Ferrante, Martina
collection PubMed
description In IgM monoclonal gammopathies MYD88(L265P) is a prognostic and predictive biomarker of therapy response. MYD88(L265P) detection is mainly performed by allele-specific quantitative PCR (ASqPCR), however recently, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been proved to be suitable for MYD88(L265P) screening and minimal residual disease monitoring (MRD). This study compared ASqPCR and ddPCR to define the most sensitive method for MYD88(L265P) detection in bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood (PB) sorted or unsorted CD19+ cells, and in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Overall, the analysis showed a good concordance rate (74%) between the two methods, especially in BM samples, while discordances (26%) were mostly in favor of ddPCR (ddPCR+ vs. ASqPCR-) and were particularly evident in samples with low mutational burden, such as PB and cfDNA. This study highlights ddPCR as a feasible approach for MYD88(L265P) detection across different specimen types (including cfDNA). Interestingly, its high sensitivity makes CD19+ selection dispensable. On the other hand, our results showed that MYD88(L265P) detection on PB samples, especially with ASqPCR, is suboptimal for screening and MRD analysis. Finally, significantly different MYD88(L265P) mutational levels observed between Waldenström Macroglobulinemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients suggest the need for further studies in order to identify possible correlations between mutational levels and risk of progression to Waldenström.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8146978
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81469782021-05-26 MYD88(L265P) Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation Ferrante, Martina Furlan, Daniela Zibellini, Silvia Borriero, Michela Candido, Chiara Sahnane, Nora Uccella, Silvia Genuardi, Elisa Alessandria, Beatrice Bianchi, Benedetta Mora, Barbara Grimaldi, Daniele Defrancesco, Irene Jiménez, Cristina Cavallo, Federica Ferrero, Dario Dogliotti, Irene Merli, Michele Varettoni, Marzia Ferrero, Simone Drandi, Daniela Diagnostics (Basel) Article In IgM monoclonal gammopathies MYD88(L265P) is a prognostic and predictive biomarker of therapy response. MYD88(L265P) detection is mainly performed by allele-specific quantitative PCR (ASqPCR), however recently, droplet digital PCR (ddPCR) has been proved to be suitable for MYD88(L265P) screening and minimal residual disease monitoring (MRD). This study compared ASqPCR and ddPCR to define the most sensitive method for MYD88(L265P) detection in bone marrow (BM), peripheral blood (PB) sorted or unsorted CD19+ cells, and in plasma cell-free DNA (cfDNA). Overall, the analysis showed a good concordance rate (74%) between the two methods, especially in BM samples, while discordances (26%) were mostly in favor of ddPCR (ddPCR+ vs. ASqPCR-) and were particularly evident in samples with low mutational burden, such as PB and cfDNA. This study highlights ddPCR as a feasible approach for MYD88(L265P) detection across different specimen types (including cfDNA). Interestingly, its high sensitivity makes CD19+ selection dispensable. On the other hand, our results showed that MYD88(L265P) detection on PB samples, especially with ASqPCR, is suboptimal for screening and MRD analysis. Finally, significantly different MYD88(L265P) mutational levels observed between Waldenström Macroglobulinemia and IgM monoclonal gammopathy of undetermined significance patients suggest the need for further studies in order to identify possible correlations between mutational levels and risk of progression to Waldenström. MDPI 2021-04-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8146978/ /pubmed/33926007 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050779 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Ferrante, Martina
Furlan, Daniela
Zibellini, Silvia
Borriero, Michela
Candido, Chiara
Sahnane, Nora
Uccella, Silvia
Genuardi, Elisa
Alessandria, Beatrice
Bianchi, Benedetta
Mora, Barbara
Grimaldi, Daniele
Defrancesco, Irene
Jiménez, Cristina
Cavallo, Federica
Ferrero, Dario
Dogliotti, Irene
Merli, Michele
Varettoni, Marzia
Ferrero, Simone
Drandi, Daniela
MYD88(L265P) Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation
title MYD88(L265P) Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation
title_full MYD88(L265P) Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation
title_fullStr MYD88(L265P) Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation
title_full_unstemmed MYD88(L265P) Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation
title_short MYD88(L265P) Detection in IgM Monoclonal Gammopathies: Methodological Considerations for Routine Implementation
title_sort myd88(l265p) detection in igm monoclonal gammopathies: methodological considerations for routine implementation
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8146978/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33926007
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/diagnostics11050779
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrantemartina myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT furlandaniela myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT zibellinisilvia myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT borrieromichela myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT candidochiara myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT sahnanenora myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT uccellasilvia myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT genuardielisa myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT alessandriabeatrice myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT bianchibenedetta myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT morabarbara myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT grimaldidaniele myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT defrancescoirene myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT jimenezcristina myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT cavallofederica myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT ferrerodario myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT dogliottiirene myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT merlimichele myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT varettonimarzia myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT ferrerosimone myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation
AT drandidaniela myd88l265pdetectioninigmmonoclonalgammopathiesmethodologicalconsiderationsforroutineimplementation