Cargando…

Providing trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic effectiveness RCTs: a scoping review

BACKGROUND: There is an ethical imperative to offer the results of trials to those who participated. Existing research highlights that less than a third of trials do so, despite the desire of participants to receive the results of the trials they participated in. This scoping review aimed to identif...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales:	Bruhn, Hanne, Cowan, Elle-Jay, Campbell, Marion K., Constable, Lynda, Cotton, Seonaidh, Entwistle, Vikki, Humphreys, Rosemary, Innes, Karen, Jayacodi, Sandra, Knapp, Peter, South, Annabelle, Gillies, Katie
Formato:	Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:	English
Publicado:	BioMed Central 2021
Materias:	Research
Acceso en línea:	https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8147098/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34030707 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s13063-021-05300-x

Ejemplares similares

What, how, when and who of trial results summaries for trial participants: stakeholder-informed guidance from the RECAP project
por: Bruhn, Hanne, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

Q methodology with cognitive interviewing to rank the importance of informational items in a patient information leaflet
por: Innes, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Relative importance of informational items in participant information leaflets for trials: a Q-methodology approach
por: Innes, Karen, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

Dissemination of trial results to participants in phase III pragmatic clinical trials: an audit of trial investigators intentions
por: Raza, M Zulfiqar, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Patient reported measures of informed consent for clinical trials: A systematic review
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2018)

The relative importance of information items and preferred mode of delivery when disseminating results from trials to participants: A mixed‐methods study
por: Wood, Jessica, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Do trial managers know when sites will fail to recruit? Preliminary results from the estimating site performance (ESP) study
por: Shearer, Kirsty, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Analysis of patient information leaflets (PILs), used in clinical trials using the Informed Consent Evaluation instrument (ICEi)
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

EvaLuation of Interventions for informed Consent for randomIsed controlled Trials (ELICIT): developing a core outcome set
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): developing a core outcome set
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Vaginal birth after caesarean section: why is uptake so low? Insights from a meta-ethnographic synthesis of women's accounts of their birth choices
por: Black, Mairead, et al.
Publicado: (2016)

Estimating Site Performance (ESP): can trial managers predict recruitment success at trial sites? An exploratory study
por: Bruhn, Hanne, et al.
Publicado: (2019)

Patient information leaflets (PILs) for UK randomised controlled trials: a feasibility study exploring whether they contain information to support decision making about trial participation
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2014)

How to deal with a temporary suspension and restarting your trial: our experiences and lessons learnt
por: Constable, Lynda, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Verifying participant-reported clinical outcomes: challenges and implications
por: Breeman, Suzanne, et al.
Publicado: (2020)

Evaluation of interventions for informed consent for randomised controlled trials (ELICIT): protocol for a systematic review of the literature and identification of a core outcome set using a Delphi survey
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

An international core outcome set for evaluating interventions to improve informed consent to clinical trials: The ELICIT Study
por: Gillies, Katie, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Telephone calls to boost response rates in the collection of outcome data
por: Breeman, Suzanne, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Patient and public involvement in numerical aspects of trials (PoINT): exploring patient and public partners experiences and identifying stakeholder priorities
por: Goulao, Beatriz, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Equipoise in action: a qualitative investigation across six pragmatic randomised controlled trials (RCTs)
por: Rooshenas, Leila, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Determining sample size for progression criteria for pragmatic pilot RCTs: the hypothesis test strikes back!
por: Lewis, M., et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Delivering a drug study in primary care: trial management challenges and solutions
por: Cotton, Seonaidh, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Recruitment to trials: insights from a meta-ethnography of qualitative studies
por: McCann, Sharon, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Group sequential designs in pragmatic trials: feasibility and assessment of utility using data from a number of recent surgical RCTs
por: Parsons, Nick R., et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The importance of rapport and relationship building when recruiting to clinical trials: a qualitative investigation of trial recruitment consultations in a surgical RCT
por: Constable, Lynda, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

Using qualitative methods in pilot and feasibility trials to inform recruitment and retention processes in full-scale randomised trials: a qualitative evidence synthesis
por: Elfeky, Adel, et al.
Publicado: (2022)

The Shiny Balancer - software and imbalance criteria for optimally balanced treatment allocation in small RCTs and cRCTs
por: Grischott, Thomas
Publicado: (2018)

Inclusion and Analysis of Older Adults in RCTs
por: Van de Water, W., et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Drivers and barriers to patient participation in RCTs
por: Jenkins, V, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

Reasons for participating in randomised controlled trials: conditional altruism and considerations for self
por: McCann, Sharon K, et al.
Publicado: (2010)

What’s the uptake? Pragmatic RCTs may be used to estimate uptake, and thereby population impact of interventions, but better reporting of trial recruitment processes is needed
por: Bell, Katy J. L., et al.
Publicado: (2017)

It is unprecedented: trial management during the COVID-19 pandemic and beyond
por: Mitchell, Eleanor J., et al.
Publicado: (2020)

A centralised public information resource for randomised trials: a scoping study to explore desirability and feasibility
por: Langston, Anne L, et al.
Publicado: (2005)

Form follows function: pragmatic controlled trials (PCTs) have to answer different questions and require different designs than randomized controlled trials (RCTs)
por: Porzsolt, Franz, et al.
Publicado: (2012)

A pragmatic multi-centre randomised controlled trial of fluid loading in high-risk surgical patients undergoing major elective surgery - the FOCCUS study
por: Cuthbertson, Brian H, et al.
Publicado: (2011)

Treating Patients as Persons: A Capabilities Approach to Support Delivery of Person-Centered Care
por: Entwistle, Vikki A., et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The contribution of RCTs to quality management and their feasibility in practice
por: Brox, Jens Ivar
Publicado: (2009)

Methods for standardising and monitoring surgical interventions in RCTs
por: Blencowe, Natalie, et al.
Publicado: (2015)

The application of standardised diagnostic criteria in RCTS in depression
por: Ferry, Finola, et al.
Publicado: (2013)

The statistical properties of RCTs and a proposal for shrinkage
por: van Zwet, Erik, et al.
Publicado: (2021)

Cannot write session to /tmp/vufind_sessions/sess_4fk87dq9q0rbmsqhfjbnu1jo7c