Cargando…

Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models

Permeation assays are important for the development of topical formulations applied on buccal mucosa. Swine buccal and esophageal epithelia are usually used as barriers for these assays, while frozen epithelia have been used to optimize the experimental setup. However, there is no consensus on these...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: de Araújo, Jaiza Samara Macena, Volpato, Maria Cristina, Muniz, Bruno Vilela, Xavier, Gabriela Gama Augusto, Martinelli, Claudia Cristina Maia, Lopez, Renata Fonseca Vianna, Groppo, Francisco Carlos, Franz-Montan, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8147247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33946622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050643
_version_ 1783697586133139456
author de Araújo, Jaiza Samara Macena
Volpato, Maria Cristina
Muniz, Bruno Vilela
Xavier, Gabriela Gama Augusto
Martinelli, Claudia Cristina Maia
Lopez, Renata Fonseca Vianna
Groppo, Francisco Carlos
Franz-Montan, Michelle
author_facet de Araújo, Jaiza Samara Macena
Volpato, Maria Cristina
Muniz, Bruno Vilela
Xavier, Gabriela Gama Augusto
Martinelli, Claudia Cristina Maia
Lopez, Renata Fonseca Vianna
Groppo, Francisco Carlos
Franz-Montan, Michelle
author_sort de Araújo, Jaiza Samara Macena
collection PubMed
description Permeation assays are important for the development of topical formulations applied on buccal mucosa. Swine buccal and esophageal epithelia are usually used as barriers for these assays, while frozen epithelia have been used to optimize the experimental setup. However, there is no consensus on these methods. In transdermal studies, barrier integrity has been evaluated by measuring electrical resistance (ER) across the skin, which has been demonstrated to be a simple, fast, safe, and cost-effective method. Therefore, the aims here were to investigate whether ER might also be an effective method to evaluate buccal and esophageal epithelium mucosa integrity for in vitro permeation studies, and to establish a cut-off ER value for each epithelium mucosa model. We further investigated whether buccal epithelium could be substituted by esophageal epithelium in transbuccal permeation studies, and whether their permeability and integrity were affected by freezing at −20 °C for 3 weeks. Fresh and frozen swine buccal and esophageal epithelia were mounted in Franz diffusion cells and were then submitted to ER measurement. Permeation assays were performed using lidocaine hydrochloride as a hydrophilic drug model. ER was shown to be a reliable method for evaluating esophageal and buccal epithelia. The esophageal epithelium presented higher permeability compared to the buccal epithelium. For both epithelia, freezing and storage led to decreased electrical resistivity and increased permeability. We conclude that ER may be safely used to confirm tissue integrity when it is equal to or above 3 kΩ for fresh esophageal mucosa, but not for buccal epithelium mucosa. However, the use of esophageal epithelium in in vitro transmucosal studies could overestimate the absorption of hydrophilic drugs. In addition, fresh samples are recommended for these experiments, especially when hydrophilic drugs are involved.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8147247
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81472472021-05-26 Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models de Araújo, Jaiza Samara Macena Volpato, Maria Cristina Muniz, Bruno Vilela Xavier, Gabriela Gama Augusto Martinelli, Claudia Cristina Maia Lopez, Renata Fonseca Vianna Groppo, Francisco Carlos Franz-Montan, Michelle Pharmaceutics Article Permeation assays are important for the development of topical formulations applied on buccal mucosa. Swine buccal and esophageal epithelia are usually used as barriers for these assays, while frozen epithelia have been used to optimize the experimental setup. However, there is no consensus on these methods. In transdermal studies, barrier integrity has been evaluated by measuring electrical resistance (ER) across the skin, which has been demonstrated to be a simple, fast, safe, and cost-effective method. Therefore, the aims here were to investigate whether ER might also be an effective method to evaluate buccal and esophageal epithelium mucosa integrity for in vitro permeation studies, and to establish a cut-off ER value for each epithelium mucosa model. We further investigated whether buccal epithelium could be substituted by esophageal epithelium in transbuccal permeation studies, and whether their permeability and integrity were affected by freezing at −20 °C for 3 weeks. Fresh and frozen swine buccal and esophageal epithelia were mounted in Franz diffusion cells and were then submitted to ER measurement. Permeation assays were performed using lidocaine hydrochloride as a hydrophilic drug model. ER was shown to be a reliable method for evaluating esophageal and buccal epithelia. The esophageal epithelium presented higher permeability compared to the buccal epithelium. For both epithelia, freezing and storage led to decreased electrical resistivity and increased permeability. We conclude that ER may be safely used to confirm tissue integrity when it is equal to or above 3 kΩ for fresh esophageal mucosa, but not for buccal epithelium mucosa. However, the use of esophageal epithelium in in vitro transmucosal studies could overestimate the absorption of hydrophilic drugs. In addition, fresh samples are recommended for these experiments, especially when hydrophilic drugs are involved. MDPI 2021-04-30 /pmc/articles/PMC8147247/ /pubmed/33946622 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050643 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
de Araújo, Jaiza Samara Macena
Volpato, Maria Cristina
Muniz, Bruno Vilela
Xavier, Gabriela Gama Augusto
Martinelli, Claudia Cristina Maia
Lopez, Renata Fonseca Vianna
Groppo, Francisco Carlos
Franz-Montan, Michelle
Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models
title Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models
title_full Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models
title_fullStr Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models
title_full_unstemmed Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models
title_short Resistivity Technique for the Evaluation of the Integrity of Buccal and Esophageal Epithelium Mucosa for In Vitro Permeation Studies: Swine Buccal and Esophageal Mucosa Barrier Models
title_sort resistivity technique for the evaluation of the integrity of buccal and esophageal epithelium mucosa for in vitro permeation studies: swine buccal and esophageal mucosa barrier models
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8147247/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33946622
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/pharmaceutics13050643
work_keys_str_mv AT dearaujojaizasamaramacena resistivitytechniquefortheevaluationoftheintegrityofbuccalandesophagealepitheliummucosaforinvitropermeationstudiesswinebuccalandesophagealmucosabarriermodels
AT volpatomariacristina resistivitytechniquefortheevaluationoftheintegrityofbuccalandesophagealepitheliummucosaforinvitropermeationstudiesswinebuccalandesophagealmucosabarriermodels
AT munizbrunovilela resistivitytechniquefortheevaluationoftheintegrityofbuccalandesophagealepitheliummucosaforinvitropermeationstudiesswinebuccalandesophagealmucosabarriermodels
AT xaviergabrielagamaaugusto resistivitytechniquefortheevaluationoftheintegrityofbuccalandesophagealepitheliummucosaforinvitropermeationstudiesswinebuccalandesophagealmucosabarriermodels
AT martinelliclaudiacristinamaia resistivitytechniquefortheevaluationoftheintegrityofbuccalandesophagealepitheliummucosaforinvitropermeationstudiesswinebuccalandesophagealmucosabarriermodels
AT lopezrenatafonsecavianna resistivitytechniquefortheevaluationoftheintegrityofbuccalandesophagealepitheliummucosaforinvitropermeationstudiesswinebuccalandesophagealmucosabarriermodels
AT groppofranciscocarlos resistivitytechniquefortheevaluationoftheintegrityofbuccalandesophagealepitheliummucosaforinvitropermeationstudiesswinebuccalandesophagealmucosabarriermodels
AT franzmontanmichelle resistivitytechniquefortheevaluationoftheintegrityofbuccalandesophagealepitheliummucosaforinvitropermeationstudiesswinebuccalandesophagealmucosabarriermodels