Cargando…
Alternative Devices for Heart Rate Variability Measures: A Comparative Test–Retest Reliability Study
Using healthy adult participants, seven measures of heart rate variability were obtained simultaneously from four devices in five behavioral conditions. Two devices were ECG-based and two utilized photoplethysmography. The 140 numerical values (measure, condition, device) are presented. The comparat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8147413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs11050068 |
_version_ | 1783697625217761280 |
---|---|
author | Killian, Jacquelin M. Radin, Rachel M. Gardner, Cubby L. Kasuske, Lalon Bashirelahi, Kylee Nathan, Dominic Keyser, David O. Cellucci, Christopher J. Darmon, David Rapp, Paul E. |
author_facet | Killian, Jacquelin M. Radin, Rachel M. Gardner, Cubby L. Kasuske, Lalon Bashirelahi, Kylee Nathan, Dominic Keyser, David O. Cellucci, Christopher J. Darmon, David Rapp, Paul E. |
author_sort | Killian, Jacquelin M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Using healthy adult participants, seven measures of heart rate variability were obtained simultaneously from four devices in five behavioral conditions. Two devices were ECG-based and two utilized photoplethysmography. The 140 numerical values (measure, condition, device) are presented. The comparative operational reliability of the four devices was assessed, and it was found that the two ECG-base devices were more reliable than the photoplethysmographic devices. The interchangeability of devices was assessed by determining the between-device Limits of Agreement. Intraclass correlation coefficients were determined and used to calculate the standard error of measurement and the Minimal Detectable Difference. The Minimal Detectable Difference, MDD, quantifies the smallest statistically significant change in a measure and is therefore critical when HRV measures are used longitudinally to assess treatment response or disease progression. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8147413 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81474132021-05-26 Alternative Devices for Heart Rate Variability Measures: A Comparative Test–Retest Reliability Study Killian, Jacquelin M. Radin, Rachel M. Gardner, Cubby L. Kasuske, Lalon Bashirelahi, Kylee Nathan, Dominic Keyser, David O. Cellucci, Christopher J. Darmon, David Rapp, Paul E. Behav Sci (Basel) Article Using healthy adult participants, seven measures of heart rate variability were obtained simultaneously from four devices in five behavioral conditions. Two devices were ECG-based and two utilized photoplethysmography. The 140 numerical values (measure, condition, device) are presented. The comparative operational reliability of the four devices was assessed, and it was found that the two ECG-base devices were more reliable than the photoplethysmographic devices. The interchangeability of devices was assessed by determining the between-device Limits of Agreement. Intraclass correlation coefficients were determined and used to calculate the standard error of measurement and the Minimal Detectable Difference. The Minimal Detectable Difference, MDD, quantifies the smallest statistically significant change in a measure and is therefore critical when HRV measures are used longitudinally to assess treatment response or disease progression. MDPI 2021-05-02 /pmc/articles/PMC8147413/ /pubmed/34063229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs11050068 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Killian, Jacquelin M. Radin, Rachel M. Gardner, Cubby L. Kasuske, Lalon Bashirelahi, Kylee Nathan, Dominic Keyser, David O. Cellucci, Christopher J. Darmon, David Rapp, Paul E. Alternative Devices for Heart Rate Variability Measures: A Comparative Test–Retest Reliability Study |
title | Alternative Devices for Heart Rate Variability Measures: A Comparative Test–Retest Reliability Study |
title_full | Alternative Devices for Heart Rate Variability Measures: A Comparative Test–Retest Reliability Study |
title_fullStr | Alternative Devices for Heart Rate Variability Measures: A Comparative Test–Retest Reliability Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Alternative Devices for Heart Rate Variability Measures: A Comparative Test–Retest Reliability Study |
title_short | Alternative Devices for Heart Rate Variability Measures: A Comparative Test–Retest Reliability Study |
title_sort | alternative devices for heart rate variability measures: a comparative test–retest reliability study |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8147413/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063229 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/bs11050068 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT killianjacquelinm alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT radinrachelm alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT gardnercubbyl alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT kasuskelalon alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT bashirelahikylee alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT nathandominic alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT keyserdavido alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT celluccichristopherj alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT darmondavid alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy AT rapppaule alternativedevicesforheartratevariabilitymeasuresacomparativetestretestreliabilitystudy |