Cargando…
Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning
PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous and aggressive disease with poorer prognosis than other subtypes. We aimed to investigate the prognostic efficacy of multiple tumor markers and constructed a prognostic model for stage I-III TNBC patients. Patients and Methods. We incl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8147528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6641421 |
_version_ | 1783697647635267584 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Huihui Wu, Shijie Hu, Jun Zhang, Kun Hu, Kaimin Lu, Yuexin He, Jiapan Pan, Tao Chen, Yiding |
author_facet | Chen, Huihui Wu, Shijie Hu, Jun Zhang, Kun Hu, Kaimin Lu, Yuexin He, Jiapan Pan, Tao Chen, Yiding |
author_sort | Chen, Huihui |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous and aggressive disease with poorer prognosis than other subtypes. We aimed to investigate the prognostic efficacy of multiple tumor markers and constructed a prognostic model for stage I-III TNBC patients. Patients and Methods. We included stage I-III TNBC patients whose serum tumor markers levels were measured prior to the treatment. The optimal cut-off value of each tumor marker was determined by X-tile. Then, we adopted two survival models (lasso Cox model and random survival forest model) to build the prognostic model and AUC values of the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curves and the log-rank test was used to test whether there was a significant difference between the predicted high-risk and low-risk groups. We used univariable and multivariable Cox analysis to identify independent prognostic factors and did subgroup analysis further for the lasso Cox model. RESULTS: We included 258 stage I-III TNBC patients. CEA, CA125, and CA211 showed independent prognostic value for DFS when using the optimal cut-off values; their HRs and 95% CI were as follows: 1.787 (1.056–3.226), 2.684 (1.200–3.931), and 2.513 (1.567–4.877). AUC values of lasso Cox model and random survival forest model were 0.740 and 0.663 for DFS at 60 months, respectively. Both the lasso Cox model and random survival forest model demonstrated excellent prognostic value. According to tumor marker risk scores (TMRS) computed by the lasso Cox model, the high TMRS group had worse DFS (HR = 3.138, 95% CI: 1.711–5.033, p < 0.0001) and OS (3.983, 1.637–7.214, p=0.0011) than low TMRS group. Furthermore, subgroup analysis of N(0)-N(1) patients in the lasso Cox model indicated that TMRS still had a significant prognostic effect on DFS (2.278, 1.189–4.346) and OS (2.982, 1.110–7.519). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that pretreatment levels of serum CEA, CA125, and CA211 had independent prognostic significance for TNBC patients. Both lasso Cox model and random survival forest model that we constructed based on tumor markers could strongly predict the survival risk. Higher TMRS was associated with worse DFS and OS both in stage I-III and N(0)-N(1) TNBC patients. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8147528 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Hindawi |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81475282021-05-27 Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning Chen, Huihui Wu, Shijie Hu, Jun Zhang, Kun Hu, Kaimin Lu, Yuexin He, Jiapan Pan, Tao Chen, Yiding J Oncol Research Article PURPOSE: Triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is a heterogeneous and aggressive disease with poorer prognosis than other subtypes. We aimed to investigate the prognostic efficacy of multiple tumor markers and constructed a prognostic model for stage I-III TNBC patients. Patients and Methods. We included stage I-III TNBC patients whose serum tumor markers levels were measured prior to the treatment. The optimal cut-off value of each tumor marker was determined by X-tile. Then, we adopted two survival models (lasso Cox model and random survival forest model) to build the prognostic model and AUC values of the time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) were calculated. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to plot the survival curves and the log-rank test was used to test whether there was a significant difference between the predicted high-risk and low-risk groups. We used univariable and multivariable Cox analysis to identify independent prognostic factors and did subgroup analysis further for the lasso Cox model. RESULTS: We included 258 stage I-III TNBC patients. CEA, CA125, and CA211 showed independent prognostic value for DFS when using the optimal cut-off values; their HRs and 95% CI were as follows: 1.787 (1.056–3.226), 2.684 (1.200–3.931), and 2.513 (1.567–4.877). AUC values of lasso Cox model and random survival forest model were 0.740 and 0.663 for DFS at 60 months, respectively. Both the lasso Cox model and random survival forest model demonstrated excellent prognostic value. According to tumor marker risk scores (TMRS) computed by the lasso Cox model, the high TMRS group had worse DFS (HR = 3.138, 95% CI: 1.711–5.033, p < 0.0001) and OS (3.983, 1.637–7.214, p=0.0011) than low TMRS group. Furthermore, subgroup analysis of N(0)-N(1) patients in the lasso Cox model indicated that TMRS still had a significant prognostic effect on DFS (2.278, 1.189–4.346) and OS (2.982, 1.110–7.519). CONCLUSIONS: Our study indicated that pretreatment levels of serum CEA, CA125, and CA211 had independent prognostic significance for TNBC patients. Both lasso Cox model and random survival forest model that we constructed based on tumor markers could strongly predict the survival risk. Higher TMRS was associated with worse DFS and OS both in stage I-III and N(0)-N(1) TNBC patients. Hindawi 2021-05-15 /pmc/articles/PMC8147528/ /pubmed/34054955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6641421 Text en Copyright © 2021 Huihui Chen et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Chen, Huihui Wu, Shijie Hu, Jun Zhang, Kun Hu, Kaimin Lu, Yuexin He, Jiapan Pan, Tao Chen, Yiding Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning |
title | Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning |
title_full | Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning |
title_fullStr | Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning |
title_full_unstemmed | Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning |
title_short | Prognostic Models for Nonmetastatic Triple-Negative Breast Cancer Based on the Pretreatment Serum Tumor Markers with Machine Learning |
title_sort | prognostic models for nonmetastatic triple-negative breast cancer based on the pretreatment serum tumor markers with machine learning |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8147528/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34054955 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/6641421 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenhuihui prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning AT wushijie prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning AT hujun prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning AT zhangkun prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning AT hukaimin prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning AT luyuexin prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning AT hejiapan prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning AT pantao prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning AT chenyiding prognosticmodelsfornonmetastatictriplenegativebreastcancerbasedonthepretreatmentserumtumormarkerswithmachinelearning |