Cargando…
A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy
The high incidence of sunlight-induced human skin cancers reveals a need for more effective photosensitizing agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of prophylactic photodynamic therapy (PDT) when methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) were used as photosensiti...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8148192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14050433 |
_version_ | 1783697799283474432 |
---|---|
author | Wulf, Hans Christian Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil Glud, Martin Philipsen, Peter Alshede Lerche, Catharina Margrethe |
author_facet | Wulf, Hans Christian Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil Glud, Martin Philipsen, Peter Alshede Lerche, Catharina Margrethe |
author_sort | Wulf, Hans Christian |
collection | PubMed |
description | The high incidence of sunlight-induced human skin cancers reveals a need for more effective photosensitizing agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of prophylactic photodynamic therapy (PDT) when methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) were used as photosensitizers. All mice in four groups of female C3.Cg/TifBomTac hairless immunocompetent mice (N = 100) were irradiated with three standard erythema doses of solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) thrice weekly. Three groups received 2 × 2 prophylactic PDT treatments (days 45 + 52 and 90 + 97). The PDT treatments consisted of topical administration of 16% MAL, 20% MB, or 20% RF, and subsequent illumination that matched the photosensitizers’ absorption spectra. Control mice received no PDT. We recorded when the first, second, and third skin tumors developed. The pattern of tumor development after MB-PDT or RF-PDT was similar to that observed in irradiated control mice (p > 0.05). However, the median times until the first, second, and third skin tumors developed in mice given MAL-PDT were significantly delayed, compared with control mice (256, 265, and 272 vs. 215, 222, and 230 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Only MAL-PDT was an effective prophylactic treatment against UVR-induced skin tumors in hairless mice. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8148192 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81481922021-05-26 A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy Wulf, Hans Christian Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil Glud, Martin Philipsen, Peter Alshede Lerche, Catharina Margrethe Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article The high incidence of sunlight-induced human skin cancers reveals a need for more effective photosensitizing agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of prophylactic photodynamic therapy (PDT) when methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) were used as photosensitizers. All mice in four groups of female C3.Cg/TifBomTac hairless immunocompetent mice (N = 100) were irradiated with three standard erythema doses of solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) thrice weekly. Three groups received 2 × 2 prophylactic PDT treatments (days 45 + 52 and 90 + 97). The PDT treatments consisted of topical administration of 16% MAL, 20% MB, or 20% RF, and subsequent illumination that matched the photosensitizers’ absorption spectra. Control mice received no PDT. We recorded when the first, second, and third skin tumors developed. The pattern of tumor development after MB-PDT or RF-PDT was similar to that observed in irradiated control mice (p > 0.05). However, the median times until the first, second, and third skin tumors developed in mice given MAL-PDT were significantly delayed, compared with control mice (256, 265, and 272 vs. 215, 222, and 230 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Only MAL-PDT was an effective prophylactic treatment against UVR-induced skin tumors in hairless mice. MDPI 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8148192/ /pubmed/34063120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14050433 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Wulf, Hans Christian Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil Glud, Martin Philipsen, Peter Alshede Lerche, Catharina Margrethe A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy |
title | A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy |
title_full | A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy |
title_fullStr | A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy |
title_full_unstemmed | A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy |
title_short | A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy |
title_sort | skin cancer prophylaxis study in hairless mice using methylene blue, riboflavin, and methyl aminolevulinate as photosensitizing agents in photodynamic therapy |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8148192/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14050433 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT wulfhanschristian askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT alchaerraminabil askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT gludmartin askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT philipsenpeteralshede askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT lerchecatharinamargrethe askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT wulfhanschristian skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT alchaerraminabil skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT gludmartin skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT philipsenpeteralshede skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy AT lerchecatharinamargrethe skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy |