Cargando…

A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy

The high incidence of sunlight-induced human skin cancers reveals a need for more effective photosensitizing agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of prophylactic photodynamic therapy (PDT) when methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) were used as photosensiti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wulf, Hans Christian, Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil, Glud, Martin, Philipsen, Peter Alshede, Lerche, Catharina Margrethe
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8148192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14050433
_version_ 1783697799283474432
author Wulf, Hans Christian
Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil
Glud, Martin
Philipsen, Peter Alshede
Lerche, Catharina Margrethe
author_facet Wulf, Hans Christian
Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil
Glud, Martin
Philipsen, Peter Alshede
Lerche, Catharina Margrethe
author_sort Wulf, Hans Christian
collection PubMed
description The high incidence of sunlight-induced human skin cancers reveals a need for more effective photosensitizing agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of prophylactic photodynamic therapy (PDT) when methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) were used as photosensitizers. All mice in four groups of female C3.Cg/TifBomTac hairless immunocompetent mice (N = 100) were irradiated with three standard erythema doses of solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) thrice weekly. Three groups received 2 × 2 prophylactic PDT treatments (days 45 + 52 and 90 + 97). The PDT treatments consisted of topical administration of 16% MAL, 20% MB, or 20% RF, and subsequent illumination that matched the photosensitizers’ absorption spectra. Control mice received no PDT. We recorded when the first, second, and third skin tumors developed. The pattern of tumor development after MB-PDT or RF-PDT was similar to that observed in irradiated control mice (p > 0.05). However, the median times until the first, second, and third skin tumors developed in mice given MAL-PDT were significantly delayed, compared with control mice (256, 265, and 272 vs. 215, 222, and 230 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Only MAL-PDT was an effective prophylactic treatment against UVR-induced skin tumors in hairless mice.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8148192
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81481922021-05-26 A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy Wulf, Hans Christian Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil Glud, Martin Philipsen, Peter Alshede Lerche, Catharina Margrethe Pharmaceuticals (Basel) Article The high incidence of sunlight-induced human skin cancers reveals a need for more effective photosensitizing agents. In this study, we compared the efficacy of prophylactic photodynamic therapy (PDT) when methylene blue (MB), riboflavin (RF), or methyl aminolevulinate (MAL) were used as photosensitizers. All mice in four groups of female C3.Cg/TifBomTac hairless immunocompetent mice (N = 100) were irradiated with three standard erythema doses of solar-simulated ultraviolet radiation (UVR) thrice weekly. Three groups received 2 × 2 prophylactic PDT treatments (days 45 + 52 and 90 + 97). The PDT treatments consisted of topical administration of 16% MAL, 20% MB, or 20% RF, and subsequent illumination that matched the photosensitizers’ absorption spectra. Control mice received no PDT. We recorded when the first, second, and third skin tumors developed. The pattern of tumor development after MB-PDT or RF-PDT was similar to that observed in irradiated control mice (p > 0.05). However, the median times until the first, second, and third skin tumors developed in mice given MAL-PDT were significantly delayed, compared with control mice (256, 265, and 272 vs. 215, 222, and 230 days, respectively; p < 0.001). Only MAL-PDT was an effective prophylactic treatment against UVR-induced skin tumors in hairless mice. MDPI 2021-05-05 /pmc/articles/PMC8148192/ /pubmed/34063120 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14050433 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Wulf, Hans Christian
Al-Chaer, Rami Nabil
Glud, Martin
Philipsen, Peter Alshede
Lerche, Catharina Margrethe
A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy
title A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy
title_full A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy
title_fullStr A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy
title_full_unstemmed A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy
title_short A Skin Cancer Prophylaxis Study in Hairless Mice Using Methylene Blue, Riboflavin, and Methyl Aminolevulinate as Photosensitizing Agents in Photodynamic Therapy
title_sort skin cancer prophylaxis study in hairless mice using methylene blue, riboflavin, and methyl aminolevulinate as photosensitizing agents in photodynamic therapy
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8148192/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34063120
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ph14050433
work_keys_str_mv AT wulfhanschristian askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT alchaerraminabil askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT gludmartin askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT philipsenpeteralshede askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT lerchecatharinamargrethe askincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT wulfhanschristian skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT alchaerraminabil skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT gludmartin skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT philipsenpeteralshede skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy
AT lerchecatharinamargrethe skincancerprophylaxisstudyinhairlessmiceusingmethyleneblueriboflavinandmethylaminolevulinateasphotosensitizingagentsinphotodynamictherapy