Cargando…

The Feedback Session of an Autism Assessment: A Scoping Review of Clinical Practice Guideline Recommendations

This review aimed to assess the quality and content of recommendations for delivering an autism diagnosis, published internationally within clinical practice guidelines. Seventeen relevant guidelines were identified. When methodological information was provided, recommendations for feedback were pre...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pattison, Ellen, Ure, Alexandra, Mittiga, Sharon R., Williams, Katrina, Freeman, Nerelie C.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8148412/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036417
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10803-021-05067-9
Descripción
Sumario:This review aimed to assess the quality and content of recommendations for delivering an autism diagnosis, published internationally within clinical practice guidelines. Seventeen relevant guidelines were identified. When methodological information was provided, recommendations for feedback were predominantly formed through consensus. Recommendations consistently included who should attend feedback, the timing and mode of delivery, the clinician’s manner, and what should be discussed and/or included in an accompanying report. Specific recommendations were not consistent however, and a number of gaps were identified, such as the inclusion of educators and educational specific recommendations. Although individual variation is necessary for autism diagnosis disclosure, agreement on minimum standards of practice is warranted. Further investigation is required to establish best practice. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10803-021-05067-9.