Cargando…
Hemodynamic Profiles of Shock in Patients With COVID-19
Patients with serious COVID infections develop shock frequently. To characterize the hemodynamic profile of this cohort, 156 patients with COVID pneumonia and shock requiring vasopressors had interpretable echocardiography with measurement of ejection fraction (EF) by Simpson's rule and stroke...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier Inc.
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34167784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.029 |
_version_ | 1783697912952258560 |
---|---|
author | Hollenberg, Steven M. Safi, Lucy Parrillo, Joseph E Fata, Matthew Klinkhammer, Brent Gayed, Noha Glotzer, Taya Go, Ronaldo C. Gourna-Paleoudis, Elli Landers, David Jamal, Sameer Shah, Neel Shah, Roshan Tancredi, Jana Turi, Zoltan G. |
author_facet | Hollenberg, Steven M. Safi, Lucy Parrillo, Joseph E Fata, Matthew Klinkhammer, Brent Gayed, Noha Glotzer, Taya Go, Ronaldo C. Gourna-Paleoudis, Elli Landers, David Jamal, Sameer Shah, Neel Shah, Roshan Tancredi, Jana Turi, Zoltan G. |
author_sort | Hollenberg, Steven M. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Patients with serious COVID infections develop shock frequently. To characterize the hemodynamic profile of this cohort, 156 patients with COVID pneumonia and shock requiring vasopressors had interpretable echocardiography with measurement of ejection fraction (EF) by Simpson's rule and stroke volume (SV) by Doppler. RV systolic pressure (RVSP) was estimated from the tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity. Patients were divided into groups with low or preserved EF (EF(L) or EF(P), cutoff ≤45%), and low or normal cardiac index (CI(L) or CI(N)(,) cutoff ≤2.2 L/min/m(2)). Mean age was 67 ± 12.0, EF 59.5 ± 12.9, and CI 2.40 ± 0.86. A minority of patients had depressed EF (EF(L)CI(L), n = 15, EF(L)CI(N), n = 8); of those with preserved EF, less than half had low CI (EF(P)CI(L), n = 55, EF(P)CI(N), n = 73). Overall hospital mortality was 73%. Mortality was highest in the EF(L)CI(L) group (87%), but the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.68 by ANOVA). High PEEP correlated with low CI in the EF(P)CI(L) group (r = 0.44, p = 0.04). In conclusion, this study reports the prevalence of shock characterized by EF and CI in patients with COVID-19. COVID-induced shock had a cardiogenic profile (EF(L)CI(L)) in 9.6% of patients, reflecting the impact of COVID-19 on myocardial function. Low CI despite preservation of EF and the correlation with PEEP suggests underfilling of the LV in this subset; these patients might benefit from additional volume. Hemodynamic assessment of COVID patients with shock with definition of subgroups may allow therapy to be tailored to the underlying causes of the hemodynamic abnormalities. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8149198 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Elsevier Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81491982021-05-26 Hemodynamic Profiles of Shock in Patients With COVID-19 Hollenberg, Steven M. Safi, Lucy Parrillo, Joseph E Fata, Matthew Klinkhammer, Brent Gayed, Noha Glotzer, Taya Go, Ronaldo C. Gourna-Paleoudis, Elli Landers, David Jamal, Sameer Shah, Neel Shah, Roshan Tancredi, Jana Turi, Zoltan G. Am J Cardiol Article Patients with serious COVID infections develop shock frequently. To characterize the hemodynamic profile of this cohort, 156 patients with COVID pneumonia and shock requiring vasopressors had interpretable echocardiography with measurement of ejection fraction (EF) by Simpson's rule and stroke volume (SV) by Doppler. RV systolic pressure (RVSP) was estimated from the tricuspid regurgitation peak velocity. Patients were divided into groups with low or preserved EF (EF(L) or EF(P), cutoff ≤45%), and low or normal cardiac index (CI(L) or CI(N)(,) cutoff ≤2.2 L/min/m(2)). Mean age was 67 ± 12.0, EF 59.5 ± 12.9, and CI 2.40 ± 0.86. A minority of patients had depressed EF (EF(L)CI(L), n = 15, EF(L)CI(N), n = 8); of those with preserved EF, less than half had low CI (EF(P)CI(L), n = 55, EF(P)CI(N), n = 73). Overall hospital mortality was 73%. Mortality was highest in the EF(L)CI(L) group (87%), but the difference between groups was not significant (p = 0.68 by ANOVA). High PEEP correlated with low CI in the EF(P)CI(L) group (r = 0.44, p = 0.04). In conclusion, this study reports the prevalence of shock characterized by EF and CI in patients with COVID-19. COVID-induced shock had a cardiogenic profile (EF(L)CI(L)) in 9.6% of patients, reflecting the impact of COVID-19 on myocardial function. Low CI despite preservation of EF and the correlation with PEEP suggests underfilling of the LV in this subset; these patients might benefit from additional volume. Hemodynamic assessment of COVID patients with shock with definition of subgroups may allow therapy to be tailored to the underlying causes of the hemodynamic abnormalities. Elsevier Inc. 2021-08-15 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8149198/ /pubmed/34167784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.029 Text en © 2021 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved. Since January 2020 Elsevier has created a COVID-19 resource centre with free information in English and Mandarin on the novel coronavirus COVID-19. The COVID-19 resource centre is hosted on Elsevier Connect, the company's public news and information website. Elsevier hereby grants permission to make all its COVID-19-related research that is available on the COVID-19 resource centre - including this research content - immediately available in PubMed Central and other publicly funded repositories, such as the WHO COVID database with rights for unrestricted research re-use and analyses in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for free by Elsevier for as long as the COVID-19 resource centre remains active. |
spellingShingle | Article Hollenberg, Steven M. Safi, Lucy Parrillo, Joseph E Fata, Matthew Klinkhammer, Brent Gayed, Noha Glotzer, Taya Go, Ronaldo C. Gourna-Paleoudis, Elli Landers, David Jamal, Sameer Shah, Neel Shah, Roshan Tancredi, Jana Turi, Zoltan G. Hemodynamic Profiles of Shock in Patients With COVID-19 |
title | Hemodynamic Profiles of Shock in Patients With COVID-19 |
title_full | Hemodynamic Profiles of Shock in Patients With COVID-19 |
title_fullStr | Hemodynamic Profiles of Shock in Patients With COVID-19 |
title_full_unstemmed | Hemodynamic Profiles of Shock in Patients With COVID-19 |
title_short | Hemodynamic Profiles of Shock in Patients With COVID-19 |
title_sort | hemodynamic profiles of shock in patients with covid-19 |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149198/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34167784 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.amjcard.2021.05.029 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hollenbergstevenm hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT safilucy hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT parrillojosephe hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT fatamatthew hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT klinkhammerbrent hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT gayednoha hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT glotzertaya hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT goronaldoc hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT gournapaleoudiselli hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT landersdavid hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT jamalsameer hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT shahneel hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT shahroshan hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT tancredijana hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 AT turizoltang hemodynamicprofilesofshockinpatientswithcovid19 |