Cargando…
Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage
PURPOSE: To assess public attitudes towards fertility treatment coverage and whether attitudes are influenced by infertility labels. METHODS: Cross-sectional, web survey-based experiment using a national sample of 1226 United States adults. Participants read identical descriptions about infertility,...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer US
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z |
_version_ | 1783697933268418560 |
---|---|
author | Mancuso, Abigail C. Summers, Karen M. Chung, Rebecca Ryan, Ginny L. Scherer, Aaron M. |
author_facet | Mancuso, Abigail C. Summers, Karen M. Chung, Rebecca Ryan, Ginny L. Scherer, Aaron M. |
author_sort | Mancuso, Abigail C. |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To assess public attitudes towards fertility treatment coverage and whether attitudes are influenced by infertility labels. METHODS: Cross-sectional, web survey-based experiment using a national sample of 1226 United States adults. Participants read identical descriptions about infertility, with the exception of random assignment to infertility being labeled as a “condition,” “disease,” or “disability.” Participants then responded to questions measuring their beliefs and attitudes towards policies related to the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. We measured public support for infertility policies, public preference for infertility labels, and whether support differed by the randomly assigned label used. We also queried associations between demographic data and support for infertility policies. RESULTS: Support was higher for insurance coverage of infertility treatments (p=.014) and fertility preservation (p=.017), and infertility public assistance programs (p=.036) when infertility was described as a “disease” or “disability” compared to “condition.” Participants who were younger, were planning or trying to conceive, had a family member or friend with infertility, and/or had a more liberal political outlook were more likely to support infertility policies. A majority of participants (78%) felt the term “condition” was the best label to describe infertility, followed by “disability” (12%). The least popular label was “disease” (10%). Those preferring “condition” were older (p<.001), more likely to be non-Hispanic White (p=.046), and less likely to have an infertility diagnosis (p<.001). CONCLUSION: While less commonly identified as the best descriptors of infertility, labeling infertility as a “disease” or “disability” may increase support for policies that improve access to infertility care SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8149289 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer US |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81492892021-05-26 Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage Mancuso, Abigail C. Summers, Karen M. Chung, Rebecca Ryan, Ginny L. Scherer, Aaron M. J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: To assess public attitudes towards fertility treatment coverage and whether attitudes are influenced by infertility labels. METHODS: Cross-sectional, web survey-based experiment using a national sample of 1226 United States adults. Participants read identical descriptions about infertility, with the exception of random assignment to infertility being labeled as a “condition,” “disease,” or “disability.” Participants then responded to questions measuring their beliefs and attitudes towards policies related to the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. We measured public support for infertility policies, public preference for infertility labels, and whether support differed by the randomly assigned label used. We also queried associations between demographic data and support for infertility policies. RESULTS: Support was higher for insurance coverage of infertility treatments (p=.014) and fertility preservation (p=.017), and infertility public assistance programs (p=.036) when infertility was described as a “disease” or “disability” compared to “condition.” Participants who were younger, were planning or trying to conceive, had a family member or friend with infertility, and/or had a more liberal political outlook were more likely to support infertility policies. A majority of participants (78%) felt the term “condition” was the best label to describe infertility, followed by “disability” (12%). The least popular label was “disease” (10%). Those preferring “condition” were older (p<.001), more likely to be non-Hispanic White (p=.046), and less likely to have an infertility diagnosis (p<.001). CONCLUSION: While less commonly identified as the best descriptors of infertility, labeling infertility as a “disease” or “disability” may increase support for policies that improve access to infertility care SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z. Springer US 2021-05-26 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8149289/ /pubmed/34036457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021 |
spellingShingle | Assisted Reproduction Technologies Mancuso, Abigail C. Summers, Karen M. Chung, Rebecca Ryan, Ginny L. Scherer, Aaron M. Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage |
title | Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage |
title_full | Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage |
title_fullStr | Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage |
title_full_unstemmed | Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage |
title_short | Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage |
title_sort | condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage |
topic | Assisted Reproduction Technologies |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149289/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mancusoabigailc conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage AT summerskarenm conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage AT chungrebecca conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage AT ryanginnyl conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage AT schereraaronm conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage |