Cargando…

Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage

PURPOSE: To assess public attitudes towards fertility treatment coverage and whether attitudes are influenced by infertility labels. METHODS: Cross-sectional, web survey-based experiment using a national sample of 1226 United States adults. Participants read identical descriptions about infertility,...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mancuso, Abigail C., Summers, Karen M., Chung, Rebecca, Ryan, Ginny L., Scherer, Aaron M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z
_version_ 1783697933268418560
author Mancuso, Abigail C.
Summers, Karen M.
Chung, Rebecca
Ryan, Ginny L.
Scherer, Aaron M.
author_facet Mancuso, Abigail C.
Summers, Karen M.
Chung, Rebecca
Ryan, Ginny L.
Scherer, Aaron M.
author_sort Mancuso, Abigail C.
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To assess public attitudes towards fertility treatment coverage and whether attitudes are influenced by infertility labels. METHODS: Cross-sectional, web survey-based experiment using a national sample of 1226 United States adults. Participants read identical descriptions about infertility, with the exception of random assignment to infertility being labeled as a “condition,” “disease,” or “disability.” Participants then responded to questions measuring their beliefs and attitudes towards policies related to the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. We measured public support for infertility policies, public preference for infertility labels, and whether support differed by the randomly assigned label used. We also queried associations between demographic data and support for infertility policies. RESULTS: Support was higher for insurance coverage of infertility treatments (p=.014) and fertility preservation (p=.017), and infertility public assistance programs (p=.036) when infertility was described as a “disease” or “disability” compared to “condition.” Participants who were younger, were planning or trying to conceive, had a family member or friend with infertility, and/or had a more liberal political outlook were more likely to support infertility policies. A majority of participants (78%) felt the term “condition” was the best label to describe infertility, followed by “disability” (12%). The least popular label was “disease” (10%). Those preferring “condition” were older (p<.001), more likely to be non-Hispanic White (p=.046), and less likely to have an infertility diagnosis (p<.001). CONCLUSION: While less commonly identified as the best descriptors of infertility, labeling infertility as a “disease” or “disability” may increase support for policies that improve access to infertility care SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8149289
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81492892021-05-26 Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage Mancuso, Abigail C. Summers, Karen M. Chung, Rebecca Ryan, Ginny L. Scherer, Aaron M. J Assist Reprod Genet Assisted Reproduction Technologies PURPOSE: To assess public attitudes towards fertility treatment coverage and whether attitudes are influenced by infertility labels. METHODS: Cross-sectional, web survey-based experiment using a national sample of 1226 United States adults. Participants read identical descriptions about infertility, with the exception of random assignment to infertility being labeled as a “condition,” “disease,” or “disability.” Participants then responded to questions measuring their beliefs and attitudes towards policies related to the diagnosis and treatment of infertility. We measured public support for infertility policies, public preference for infertility labels, and whether support differed by the randomly assigned label used. We also queried associations between demographic data and support for infertility policies. RESULTS: Support was higher for insurance coverage of infertility treatments (p=.014) and fertility preservation (p=.017), and infertility public assistance programs (p=.036) when infertility was described as a “disease” or “disability” compared to “condition.” Participants who were younger, were planning or trying to conceive, had a family member or friend with infertility, and/or had a more liberal political outlook were more likely to support infertility policies. A majority of participants (78%) felt the term “condition” was the best label to describe infertility, followed by “disability” (12%). The least popular label was “disease” (10%). Those preferring “condition” were older (p<.001), more likely to be non-Hispanic White (p=.046), and less likely to have an infertility diagnosis (p<.001). CONCLUSION: While less commonly identified as the best descriptors of infertility, labeling infertility as a “disease” or “disability” may increase support for policies that improve access to infertility care SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z. Springer US 2021-05-26 2021-08 /pmc/articles/PMC8149289/ /pubmed/34036457 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z Text en © The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Science+Business Media, LLC, part of Springer Nature 2021
spellingShingle Assisted Reproduction Technologies
Mancuso, Abigail C.
Summers, Karen M.
Chung, Rebecca
Ryan, Ginny L.
Scherer, Aaron M.
Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage
title Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage
title_full Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage
title_fullStr Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage
title_full_unstemmed Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage
title_short Condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage
title_sort condition, disease, disability: how the label used to describe infertility may affect public support for fertility treatment coverage
topic Assisted Reproduction Technologies
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149289/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34036457
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10815-021-02231-z
work_keys_str_mv AT mancusoabigailc conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage
AT summerskarenm conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage
AT chungrebecca conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage
AT ryanginnyl conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage
AT schereraaronm conditiondiseasedisabilityhowthelabelusedtodescribeinfertilitymayaffectpublicsupportforfertilitytreatmentcoverage