Cargando…

Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy

BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a selective inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa and its combination with aspirin showed better outcomes in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease than aspirin alone. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to economically compare the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban (2....

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ferrara, Pietro, Cortesi, Paolo A., Di Laura, Danilo, Maggioni, Aldo P., Mantovani, Lorenzo G.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8
_version_ 1783697941668560896
author Ferrara, Pietro
Cortesi, Paolo A.
Di Laura, Danilo
Maggioni, Aldo P.
Mantovani, Lorenzo G.
author_facet Ferrara, Pietro
Cortesi, Paolo A.
Di Laura, Danilo
Maggioni, Aldo P.
Mantovani, Lorenzo G.
author_sort Ferrara, Pietro
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a selective inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa and its combination with aspirin showed better outcomes in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease than aspirin alone. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to economically compare the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily) with aspirin alone in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) and related subgroups. METHODS: The analysis simulates the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare Service and used a state-transition decision Markov model. Clinical efficacy data and health events risks were gathered from the COMPASS trial. Health outcomes and costs (in Euros) were evaluated over a lifetime horizon and were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Direct healthcare costs entered the analysis. Results were expressed in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: For the CAD or PAD population, rivaroxaban plus aspirin was more effective and costly compared with aspirin alone. Incremental costs and efficacy produced an ICER of €16,522 per QALY gained. Analyses found similar trends for the PAD and CAD groups, with respective ICERs of €8003 and €18,599, while ICERs for the other groups were lower than €13,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: Compared with aspirin alone, rivaroxaban plus aspirin is cost effective in preventing recurrent cardiovascular events in all patients with CAD or PAD, from the Italian perspective. These results could help clinicians and decision makers to develop improved strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8149345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81493452021-06-01 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy Ferrara, Pietro Cortesi, Paolo A. Di Laura, Danilo Maggioni, Aldo P. Mantovani, Lorenzo G. Clin Drug Investig Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a selective inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa and its combination with aspirin showed better outcomes in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease than aspirin alone. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to economically compare the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily) with aspirin alone in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) and related subgroups. METHODS: The analysis simulates the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare Service and used a state-transition decision Markov model. Clinical efficacy data and health events risks were gathered from the COMPASS trial. Health outcomes and costs (in Euros) were evaluated over a lifetime horizon and were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Direct healthcare costs entered the analysis. Results were expressed in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: For the CAD or PAD population, rivaroxaban plus aspirin was more effective and costly compared with aspirin alone. Incremental costs and efficacy produced an ICER of €16,522 per QALY gained. Analyses found similar trends for the PAD and CAD groups, with respective ICERs of €8003 and €18,599, while ICERs for the other groups were lower than €13,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: Compared with aspirin alone, rivaroxaban plus aspirin is cost effective in preventing recurrent cardiovascular events in all patients with CAD or PAD, from the Italian perspective. These results could help clinicians and decision makers to develop improved strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8149345/ /pubmed/33725323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Original Research Article
Ferrara, Pietro
Cortesi, Paolo A.
Di Laura, Danilo
Maggioni, Aldo P.
Mantovani, Lorenzo G.
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy
title Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy
title_full Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy
title_fullStr Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy
title_full_unstemmed Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy
title_short Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone in patients with coronary and peripheral artery diseases in italy
topic Original Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725323
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8
work_keys_str_mv AT ferrarapietro costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly
AT cortesipaoloa costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly
AT dilauradanilo costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly
AT maggionialdop costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly
AT mantovanilorenzog costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly