Cargando…
Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy
BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a selective inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa and its combination with aspirin showed better outcomes in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease than aspirin alone. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to economically compare the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban (2....
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8 |
_version_ | 1783697941668560896 |
---|---|
author | Ferrara, Pietro Cortesi, Paolo A. Di Laura, Danilo Maggioni, Aldo P. Mantovani, Lorenzo G. |
author_facet | Ferrara, Pietro Cortesi, Paolo A. Di Laura, Danilo Maggioni, Aldo P. Mantovani, Lorenzo G. |
author_sort | Ferrara, Pietro |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a selective inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa and its combination with aspirin showed better outcomes in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease than aspirin alone. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to economically compare the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily) with aspirin alone in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) and related subgroups. METHODS: The analysis simulates the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare Service and used a state-transition decision Markov model. Clinical efficacy data and health events risks were gathered from the COMPASS trial. Health outcomes and costs (in Euros) were evaluated over a lifetime horizon and were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Direct healthcare costs entered the analysis. Results were expressed in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: For the CAD or PAD population, rivaroxaban plus aspirin was more effective and costly compared with aspirin alone. Incremental costs and efficacy produced an ICER of €16,522 per QALY gained. Analyses found similar trends for the PAD and CAD groups, with respective ICERs of €8003 and €18,599, while ICERs for the other groups were lower than €13,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: Compared with aspirin alone, rivaroxaban plus aspirin is cost effective in preventing recurrent cardiovascular events in all patients with CAD or PAD, from the Italian perspective. These results could help clinicians and decision makers to develop improved strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8149345 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81493452021-06-01 Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy Ferrara, Pietro Cortesi, Paolo A. Di Laura, Danilo Maggioni, Aldo P. Mantovani, Lorenzo G. Clin Drug Investig Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Rivaroxaban is a selective inhibitor of coagulation factor Xa and its combination with aspirin showed better outcomes in the prevention of recurrent cardiovascular disease than aspirin alone. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to economically compare the cost effectiveness of rivaroxaban (2.5 mg twice daily) plus aspirin (100 mg once daily) with aspirin alone in patients with coronary artery disease (CAD) or peripheral artery disease (PAD) and related subgroups. METHODS: The analysis simulates the perspective of the Italian National Healthcare Service and used a state-transition decision Markov model. Clinical efficacy data and health events risks were gathered from the COMPASS trial. Health outcomes and costs (in Euros) were evaluated over a lifetime horizon and were discounted at 3.5% per annum. Direct healthcare costs entered the analysis. Results were expressed in terms of incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), defined as cost per quality-adjusted life-year (QALY) gained. One-way deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed. RESULTS: For the CAD or PAD population, rivaroxaban plus aspirin was more effective and costly compared with aspirin alone. Incremental costs and efficacy produced an ICER of €16,522 per QALY gained. Analyses found similar trends for the PAD and CAD groups, with respective ICERs of €8003 and €18,599, while ICERs for the other groups were lower than €13,000 per QALY. Sensitivity analyses confirmed these findings. CONCLUSION: Compared with aspirin alone, rivaroxaban plus aspirin is cost effective in preventing recurrent cardiovascular events in all patients with CAD or PAD, from the Italian perspective. These results could help clinicians and decision makers to develop improved strategies for cardiovascular disease prevention. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8. Springer International Publishing 2021-03-16 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8149345/ /pubmed/33725323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Ferrara, Pietro Cortesi, Paolo A. Di Laura, Danilo Maggioni, Aldo P. Mantovani, Lorenzo G. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy |
title | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy |
title_full | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy |
title_fullStr | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy |
title_full_unstemmed | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy |
title_short | Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Rivaroxaban Plus Aspirin Compared with Aspirin Alone in Patients with Coronary and Peripheral Artery Diseases in Italy |
title_sort | cost-effectiveness analysis of rivaroxaban plus aspirin compared with aspirin alone in patients with coronary and peripheral artery diseases in italy |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149345/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33725323 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40261-021-01023-8 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ferrarapietro costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly AT cortesipaoloa costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly AT dilauradanilo costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly AT maggionialdop costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly AT mantovanilorenzog costeffectivenessanalysisofrivaroxabanplusaspirincomparedwithaspirinaloneinpatientswithcoronaryandperipheralarterydiseasesinitaly |