Cargando…

Light-based methods for predicting circadian phase in delayed sleep–wake phase disorder

Methods for predicting circadian phase have been developed for healthy individuals. It is unknown whether these methods generalize to clinical populations, such as delayed sleep–wake phase disorder (DSWPD), where circadian timing is associated with functional outcomes. This study evaluated two metho...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Murray, Jade M., Magee, Michelle, Sletten, Tracey L., Gordon, Christopher, Lovato, Nicole, Ambani, Krutika, Bartlett, Delwyn J., Kennaway, David J., Lack, Leon C., Grunstein, Ronald R., Lockley, Steven W., Rajaratnam, Shantha M. W., Phillips, Andrew J. K.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149449/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035333
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-89924-8
Descripción
Sumario:Methods for predicting circadian phase have been developed for healthy individuals. It is unknown whether these methods generalize to clinical populations, such as delayed sleep–wake phase disorder (DSWPD), where circadian timing is associated with functional outcomes. This study evaluated two methods for predicting dim light melatonin onset (DLMO) in 154 DSWPD patients using ~ 7 days of sleep–wake and light data: a dynamic model and a statistical model. The dynamic model has been validated in healthy individuals under both laboratory and field conditions. The statistical model was developed for this dataset and used a multiple linear regression of light exposure during phase delay/advance portions of the phase response curve, as well as sleep timing and demographic variables. Both models performed comparably well in predicting DLMO. The dynamic model predicted DLMO with root mean square error of 68 min, with predictions accurate to within ± 1 h in 58% of participants and ± 2 h in 95%. The statistical model predicted DLMO with root mean square error of 57 min, with predictions accurate to within ± 1 h in 75% of participants and ± 2 h in 96%. We conclude that circadian phase prediction from light data is a viable technique for improving screening, diagnosis, and treatment of DSWPD.