Cargando…

Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study

This study compares upper cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in the three cardinal planes before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. After the dissection of the superficial structures to the alar ligament and the fixation of C2, ten cryopreserved upper cervical columns were manually mob...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hidalgo-García, César, Lorente, Ana I., López-de-Celis, Carlos, Lucha-López, Orosia, Malo-Urriés, Miguel, Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo, Maza-Frechín, Mario, Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel, Krauss, John, Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90052-6
_version_ 1783698038069395456
author Hidalgo-García, César
Lorente, Ana I.
López-de-Celis, Carlos
Lucha-López, Orosia
Malo-Urriés, Miguel
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Maza-Frechín, Mario
Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel
Krauss, John
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
author_facet Hidalgo-García, César
Lorente, Ana I.
López-de-Celis, Carlos
Lucha-López, Orosia
Malo-Urriés, Miguel
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Maza-Frechín, Mario
Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel
Krauss, John
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
author_sort Hidalgo-García, César
collection PubMed
description This study compares upper cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in the three cardinal planes before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. After the dissection of the superficial structures to the alar ligament and the fixation of C2, ten cryopreserved upper cervical columns were manually mobilized in the three cardinal planes of movement without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical ROM and mobilization force were measured using the Vicon motion capture system and a load cell respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 19.8° ± 5.2° in flexion and 14.3° ± 7.7° in extension. With stabilization, the ROM was 11.5° ± 4.3° and 6.6° ± 3.5°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 4.7° ± 2.3° in right lateral flexion and 5.6° ± 3.2° in left lateral flexion. With stabilization, the ROM was 2.3° ± 1.4° and 2.3° ± 1.2°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° and 23.7° ± 8.5° respectively. Stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical ROM by 46.9% in the sagittal plane, 55.3% in the frontal plane, and 15.6% in the transverse plane. Also, the resistance to movement during upper cervical mobilization increased following C0–C1 stabilization.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8149863
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81498632021-05-26 Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study Hidalgo-García, César Lorente, Ana I. López-de-Celis, Carlos Lucha-López, Orosia Malo-Urriés, Miguel Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo Maza-Frechín, Mario Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel Krauss, John Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert Sci Rep Article This study compares upper cervical spine range of motion (ROM) in the three cardinal planes before and after occiput-atlas (C0–C1) stabilization. After the dissection of the superficial structures to the alar ligament and the fixation of C2, ten cryopreserved upper cervical columns were manually mobilized in the three cardinal planes of movement without and with a screw stabilization of C0–C1. Upper cervical ROM and mobilization force were measured using the Vicon motion capture system and a load cell respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 19.8° ± 5.2° in flexion and 14.3° ± 7.7° in extension. With stabilization, the ROM was 11.5° ± 4.3° and 6.6° ± 3.5°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 4.7° ± 2.3° in right lateral flexion and 5.6° ± 3.2° in left lateral flexion. With stabilization, the ROM was 2.3° ± 1.4° and 2.3° ± 1.2°, respectively. The ROM without C0–C1 stabilization was 33.9° ± 6.7° in right rotation and 28.0° ± 6.9° in left rotation. With stabilization, the ROM was 28.5° ± 7.0° and 23.7° ± 8.5° respectively. Stabilization of C0–C1 reduced the upper cervical ROM by 46.9% in the sagittal plane, 55.3% in the frontal plane, and 15.6% in the transverse plane. Also, the resistance to movement during upper cervical mobilization increased following C0–C1 stabilization. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8149863/ /pubmed/34035331 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90052-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Hidalgo-García, César
Lorente, Ana I.
López-de-Celis, Carlos
Lucha-López, Orosia
Malo-Urriés, Miguel
Rodríguez-Sanz, Jacobo
Maza-Frechín, Mario
Tricás-Moreno, José Miguel
Krauss, John
Pérez-Bellmunt, Albert
Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study
title Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study
title_full Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study
title_fullStr Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study
title_full_unstemmed Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study
title_short Effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study
title_sort effects of occipital-atlas stabilization in the upper cervical spine kinematics: an in vitro study
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149863/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035331
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41598-021-90052-6
work_keys_str_mv AT hidalgogarciacesar effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT lorenteanai effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT lopezdeceliscarlos effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT luchalopezorosia effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT malourriesmiguel effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT rodriguezsanzjacobo effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT mazafrechinmario effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT tricasmorenojosemiguel effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT kraussjohn effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy
AT perezbellmuntalbert effectsofoccipitalatlasstabilizationintheuppercervicalspinekinematicsaninvitrostudy