Cargando…

The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures

Biodiversity informatics has advanced rapidly with the maturation of major biodiversity data infrastructures (BDDIs), such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility sharing unprecedented data volumes. Nevertheless, taxonomic, temporal and spatial data coverage remains unsatisfactory. With an i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Schulman, Leif, Lahti, Kari, Piirainen, Esko, Heikkinen, Mikko, Raitio, Olli, Juslén, Aino
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group UK 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00919-6
_version_ 1783698038300082176
author Schulman, Leif
Lahti, Kari
Piirainen, Esko
Heikkinen, Mikko
Raitio, Olli
Juslén, Aino
author_facet Schulman, Leif
Lahti, Kari
Piirainen, Esko
Heikkinen, Mikko
Raitio, Olli
Juslén, Aino
author_sort Schulman, Leif
collection PubMed
description Biodiversity informatics has advanced rapidly with the maturation of major biodiversity data infrastructures (BDDIs), such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility sharing unprecedented data volumes. Nevertheless, taxonomic, temporal and spatial data coverage remains unsatisfactory. With an increasing data need, the global BDDIs require continuous inflow from local data mobilisation, and national BDDIs are being developed around the world. The global BDDIs are specialised in certain data types or data life cycle stages which, despite possible merits, renders the BDDI landscape fragmented and complex. That this often is repeated at the national level creates counterproductive redundancy, complicates user services, and frustrates funders. Here, we present the Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility (FinBIF) as a model of an all-inclusive BDDI. It integrates relevant data types and phases of the data life cycle, manages them under one IT architecture, and distributes the data through one service portal under one brand. FinBIF has experienced diverse funder engagement and rapid user uptake. Therefore, we suggest the integrated and inclusive approach be adopted in national BDDI development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8149864
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Nature Publishing Group UK
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81498642021-06-10 The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures Schulman, Leif Lahti, Kari Piirainen, Esko Heikkinen, Mikko Raitio, Olli Juslén, Aino Sci Data Article Biodiversity informatics has advanced rapidly with the maturation of major biodiversity data infrastructures (BDDIs), such as the Global Biodiversity Information Facility sharing unprecedented data volumes. Nevertheless, taxonomic, temporal and spatial data coverage remains unsatisfactory. With an increasing data need, the global BDDIs require continuous inflow from local data mobilisation, and national BDDIs are being developed around the world. The global BDDIs are specialised in certain data types or data life cycle stages which, despite possible merits, renders the BDDI landscape fragmented and complex. That this often is repeated at the national level creates counterproductive redundancy, complicates user services, and frustrates funders. Here, we present the Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility (FinBIF) as a model of an all-inclusive BDDI. It integrates relevant data types and phases of the data life cycle, manages them under one IT architecture, and distributes the data through one service portal under one brand. FinBIF has experienced diverse funder engagement and rapid user uptake. Therefore, we suggest the integrated and inclusive approach be adopted in national BDDI development. Nature Publishing Group UK 2021-05-25 /pmc/articles/PMC8149864/ /pubmed/34035315 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00919-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) .
spellingShingle Article
Schulman, Leif
Lahti, Kari
Piirainen, Esko
Heikkinen, Mikko
Raitio, Olli
Juslén, Aino
The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures
title The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures
title_full The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures
title_fullStr The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures
title_full_unstemmed The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures
title_short The Finnish Biodiversity Information Facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures
title_sort finnish biodiversity information facility as a best-practice model for biodiversity data infrastructures
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149864/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34035315
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/s41597-021-00919-6
work_keys_str_mv AT schulmanleif thefinnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT lahtikari thefinnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT piirainenesko thefinnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT heikkinenmikko thefinnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT raitioolli thefinnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT juslenaino thefinnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT schulmanleif finnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT lahtikari finnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT piirainenesko finnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT heikkinenmikko finnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT raitioolli finnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures
AT juslenaino finnishbiodiversityinformationfacilityasabestpracticemodelforbiodiversitydatainfrastructures