Cargando…

Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study

BACKGROUND: The treatment of vitiligo is often challenging and requires a multi-modality approach. Fractional carbon dioxide (FCO(2)) laser has been studied as an adjuvant therapy in cases of vitiligo. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is rich in growth factors, which may contribute to the growt...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Raizada, Annie, Panda, Maitreyee, Singh, Bhabani STP, Kar, Bikash R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084009
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_188_19
_version_ 1783698063669329920
author Raizada, Annie
Panda, Maitreyee
Singh, Bhabani STP
Kar, Bikash R.
author_facet Raizada, Annie
Panda, Maitreyee
Singh, Bhabani STP
Kar, Bikash R.
author_sort Raizada, Annie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The treatment of vitiligo is often challenging and requires a multi-modality approach. Fractional carbon dioxide (FCO(2)) laser has been studied as an adjuvant therapy in cases of vitiligo. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is rich in growth factors, which may contribute to the growth of melanocytes, and thus help in the repigmentation of vitiligo patches. We aimed to study the combination of these two modalities for the treatment of vitiligo. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FCO(2) laser with PRP and FCO(2) laser alone as an adjuvant therapy in stable non-segmental vitiligo (NSV) patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, comparative, open-label interventional study was carried out for a period of 18 months from December 2017 to June 2019, at a tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with stable, NSV were assessed for eligibility; 66 patients were randomized equally into two groups. Group A received treatment with FCO(2) laser with intralesional PRP, whereas Group B was treated with FCO(2) laser alone. Patients in both the groups were treated with one therapy session and were followed up monthly for a period of 3 months. All the patients received topical psoralen with ultraviolet A (UVA) PUVA-sol treatment. Baseline and monthly assessments were done by VITILIGO AREA SEVERITY INDEX and standardized photographs. RESULTS: VASI score reduction was significantly more in the Group A with (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) 9.5 ± 0.22, 5.8 ± 1.12, and 3.6 ± 1.81 as compared to Group B 11.9 ± 2.83, 9.9 ± 3.11, and 8.9 ± 3.46 at each subsequent follow-up visits, respectively. Side effects such as burning sensation, erythema, and crusting were seen less frequently and lasted for a short period in Group A in comparison to those in Group B. CONCLUSION: Combination of FCO(2) laser and autologous intralesional PRP has a synergetic effect in treating patients with vitiligo as an adjuvant therapy with minimal adverse effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8149972
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81499722021-06-02 Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study Raizada, Annie Panda, Maitreyee Singh, Bhabani STP Kar, Bikash R. J Cutan Aesthet Surg Original Article BACKGROUND: The treatment of vitiligo is often challenging and requires a multi-modality approach. Fractional carbon dioxide (FCO(2)) laser has been studied as an adjuvant therapy in cases of vitiligo. Autologous platelet-rich plasma (PRP) is rich in growth factors, which may contribute to the growth of melanocytes, and thus help in the repigmentation of vitiligo patches. We aimed to study the combination of these two modalities for the treatment of vitiligo. AIMS AND OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of FCO(2) laser with PRP and FCO(2) laser alone as an adjuvant therapy in stable non-segmental vitiligo (NSV) patients. SETTINGS AND DESIGN: A prospective, randomized, comparative, open-label interventional study was carried out for a period of 18 months from December 2017 to June 2019, at a tertiary care hospital. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy patients with stable, NSV were assessed for eligibility; 66 patients were randomized equally into two groups. Group A received treatment with FCO(2) laser with intralesional PRP, whereas Group B was treated with FCO(2) laser alone. Patients in both the groups were treated with one therapy session and were followed up monthly for a period of 3 months. All the patients received topical psoralen with ultraviolet A (UVA) PUVA-sol treatment. Baseline and monthly assessments were done by VITILIGO AREA SEVERITY INDEX and standardized photographs. RESULTS: VASI score reduction was significantly more in the Group A with (mean ± standard deviation [SD]) 9.5 ± 0.22, 5.8 ± 1.12, and 3.6 ± 1.81 as compared to Group B 11.9 ± 2.83, 9.9 ± 3.11, and 8.9 ± 3.46 at each subsequent follow-up visits, respectively. Side effects such as burning sensation, erythema, and crusting were seen less frequently and lasted for a short period in Group A in comparison to those in Group B. CONCLUSION: Combination of FCO(2) laser and autologous intralesional PRP has a synergetic effect in treating patients with vitiligo as an adjuvant therapy with minimal adverse effects. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC8149972/ /pubmed/34084009 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_188_19 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Journal of Cutaneous and Aesthetic Surgery https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms.
spellingShingle Original Article
Raizada, Annie
Panda, Maitreyee
Singh, Bhabani STP
Kar, Bikash R.
Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study
title Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study
title_full Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study
title_fullStr Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study
title_full_unstemmed Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study
title_short Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser versus Fractional Carbon Dioxide Laser with Autologous Intralesional Platelet-rich Plasma in the Treatment of Stable, Non-segmental Vitiligo: A Randomized Comparative Study
title_sort fractional carbon dioxide laser versus fractional carbon dioxide laser with autologous intralesional platelet-rich plasma in the treatment of stable, non-segmental vitiligo: a randomized comparative study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8149972/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084009
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_188_19
work_keys_str_mv AT raizadaannie fractionalcarbondioxidelaserversusfractionalcarbondioxidelaserwithautologousintralesionalplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofstablenonsegmentalvitiligoarandomizedcomparativestudy
AT pandamaitreyee fractionalcarbondioxidelaserversusfractionalcarbondioxidelaserwithautologousintralesionalplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofstablenonsegmentalvitiligoarandomizedcomparativestudy
AT singhbhabanistp fractionalcarbondioxidelaserversusfractionalcarbondioxidelaserwithautologousintralesionalplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofstablenonsegmentalvitiligoarandomizedcomparativestudy
AT karbikashr fractionalcarbondioxidelaserversusfractionalcarbondioxidelaserwithautologousintralesionalplateletrichplasmainthetreatmentofstablenonsegmentalvitiligoarandomizedcomparativestudy