Cargando…

Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users

Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely heavily on temporal envelope cues to understand speech. Temporal processing abilities may decline with advancing age in adult CI users. This study investigated the effect of age on the ability to discriminate changes in pulse rate. Twenty CI users aged 23 to 80 years...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Johnson, Kelly C., Xie, Zilong, Shader, Maureen J., Mayo, Paul G., Goupell, Matthew J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8150454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211007367
_version_ 1783698156134858752
author Johnson, Kelly C.
Xie, Zilong
Shader, Maureen J.
Mayo, Paul G.
Goupell, Matthew J.
author_facet Johnson, Kelly C.
Xie, Zilong
Shader, Maureen J.
Mayo, Paul G.
Goupell, Matthew J.
author_sort Johnson, Kelly C.
collection PubMed
description Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely heavily on temporal envelope cues to understand speech. Temporal processing abilities may decline with advancing age in adult CI users. This study investigated the effect of age on the ability to discriminate changes in pulse rate. Twenty CI users aged 23 to 80 years participated in a rate discrimination task. They attempted to discriminate a 35% rate increase from baseline rates of 100, 200, 300, 400, or 500 pulses per second. The stimuli were electrical pulse trains delivered to a single electrode via direct stimulation to an apical (Electrode 20), a middle (Electrode 12), or a basal location (Electrode 4). Electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions were recorded at each of those electrodes as an estimate of peripheral neural survival. Results showed that temporal pulse rate discrimination performance declined with advancing age at higher stimulation rates (e.g., 500 pulses per second) when compared with lower rates. The age-related changes in temporal pulse rate discrimination at higher stimulation rates persisted after statistical analysis to account for the estimated peripheral contributions from electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions. These results indicate the potential contributions of central factors to the limitations in temporal pulse rate discrimination ability associated with aging in CI users.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8150454
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81504542021-06-07 Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users Johnson, Kelly C. Xie, Zilong Shader, Maureen J. Mayo, Paul G. Goupell, Matthew J. Trends Hear Original Article Cochlear-implant (CI) users rely heavily on temporal envelope cues to understand speech. Temporal processing abilities may decline with advancing age in adult CI users. This study investigated the effect of age on the ability to discriminate changes in pulse rate. Twenty CI users aged 23 to 80 years participated in a rate discrimination task. They attempted to discriminate a 35% rate increase from baseline rates of 100, 200, 300, 400, or 500 pulses per second. The stimuli were electrical pulse trains delivered to a single electrode via direct stimulation to an apical (Electrode 20), a middle (Electrode 12), or a basal location (Electrode 4). Electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions were recorded at each of those electrodes as an estimate of peripheral neural survival. Results showed that temporal pulse rate discrimination performance declined with advancing age at higher stimulation rates (e.g., 500 pulses per second) when compared with lower rates. The age-related changes in temporal pulse rate discrimination at higher stimulation rates persisted after statistical analysis to account for the estimated peripheral contributions from electrically evoked compound action potential amplitude growth functions. These results indicate the potential contributions of central factors to the limitations in temporal pulse rate discrimination ability associated with aging in CI users. SAGE Publications 2021-05-24 /pmc/articles/PMC8150454/ /pubmed/34028313 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211007367 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Original Article
Johnson, Kelly C.
Xie, Zilong
Shader, Maureen J.
Mayo, Paul G.
Goupell, Matthew J.
Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
title Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
title_full Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
title_fullStr Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
title_short Effect of Chronological Age on Pulse Rate Discrimination in Adult Cochlear-Implant Users
title_sort effect of chronological age on pulse rate discrimination in adult cochlear-implant users
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8150454/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34028313
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/23312165211007367
work_keys_str_mv AT johnsonkellyc effectofchronologicalageonpulseratediscriminationinadultcochlearimplantusers
AT xiezilong effectofchronologicalageonpulseratediscriminationinadultcochlearimplantusers
AT shadermaureenj effectofchronologicalageonpulseratediscriminationinadultcochlearimplantusers
AT mayopaulg effectofchronologicalageonpulseratediscriminationinadultcochlearimplantusers
AT goupellmatthewj effectofchronologicalageonpulseratediscriminationinadultcochlearimplantusers