Cargando…

Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair

BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes of three fixation techniques for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing internal fixation for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures via locking plate (Group A), lateral locking condylar pl...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Yadi, Xing, Baorui, Hou, Xiuxiu, Li, Yunmei, Li, Guoliang, Han, Guangpu, Li, Dongyue
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: SAGE Publications 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8150468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211015031
_version_ 1783698159496593408
author Zhang, Yadi
Xing, Baorui
Hou, Xiuxiu
Li, Yunmei
Li, Guoliang
Han, Guangpu
Li, Dongyue
author_facet Zhang, Yadi
Xing, Baorui
Hou, Xiuxiu
Li, Yunmei
Li, Guoliang
Han, Guangpu
Li, Dongyue
author_sort Zhang, Yadi
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes of three fixation techniques for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing internal fixation for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures via locking plate (Group A), lateral locking condylar plate and medial contoured reconstruction plate (Group B), and lateral locking condylar plate and anterior reconstruction plate (Group C). Knee joint functional recovery and functional outcomes were evaluated 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients included 34 men and 24 women aged 25 to 74 years (mean, 50.3 ± 10.73 years). Operating times were longest in Group B and similar in Groups A and C. Bleeding volume in Group A was smaller than in Group B and similar to that of Group C. Functional outcomes were excellent in 18 (31%) fractures, good in 24 (41%), moderate in 11 (19%), and poor in 5 (9%). Good-to-excellent results were achieved in 56%, 82%, and 83% of patients (Groups A, B, and C, respectively). Groups B and C's outcomes were superior to Group A's outcomes. No significant difference in postoperative complications between the groups existed. CONCLUSION: Lateral locking condylar and anterior reconstruction plating was useful for complex type C distal femoral fractures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8150468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher SAGE Publications
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81504682021-06-07 Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair Zhang, Yadi Xing, Baorui Hou, Xiuxiu Li, Yunmei Li, Guoliang Han, Guangpu Li, Dongyue J Int Med Res Clinical Research Report BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes of three fixation techniques for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing internal fixation for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures via locking plate (Group A), lateral locking condylar plate and medial contoured reconstruction plate (Group B), and lateral locking condylar plate and anterior reconstruction plate (Group C). Knee joint functional recovery and functional outcomes were evaluated 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients included 34 men and 24 women aged 25 to 74 years (mean, 50.3 ± 10.73 years). Operating times were longest in Group B and similar in Groups A and C. Bleeding volume in Group A was smaller than in Group B and similar to that of Group C. Functional outcomes were excellent in 18 (31%) fractures, good in 24 (41%), moderate in 11 (19%), and poor in 5 (9%). Good-to-excellent results were achieved in 56%, 82%, and 83% of patients (Groups A, B, and C, respectively). Groups B and C's outcomes were superior to Group A's outcomes. No significant difference in postoperative complications between the groups existed. CONCLUSION: Lateral locking condylar and anterior reconstruction plating was useful for complex type C distal femoral fractures. SAGE Publications 2021-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8150468/ /pubmed/34024192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211015031 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage).
spellingShingle Clinical Research Report
Zhang, Yadi
Xing, Baorui
Hou, Xiuxiu
Li, Yunmei
Li, Guoliang
Han, Guangpu
Li, Dongyue
Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair
title Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair
title_full Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair
title_fullStr Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair
title_short Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair
title_sort comparison of three methods of müller type c2 and c3 distal femoral fracture repair
topic Clinical Research Report
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8150468/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024192
http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211015031
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangyadi comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair
AT xingbaorui comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair
AT houxiuxiu comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair
AT liyunmei comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair
AT liguoliang comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair
AT hanguangpu comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair
AT lidongyue comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair