Cargando…
Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair
BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes of three fixation techniques for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing internal fixation for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures via locking plate (Group A), lateral locking condylar pl...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8150468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211015031 |
_version_ | 1783698159496593408 |
---|---|
author | Zhang, Yadi Xing, Baorui Hou, Xiuxiu Li, Yunmei Li, Guoliang Han, Guangpu Li, Dongyue |
author_facet | Zhang, Yadi Xing, Baorui Hou, Xiuxiu Li, Yunmei Li, Guoliang Han, Guangpu Li, Dongyue |
author_sort | Zhang, Yadi |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes of three fixation techniques for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing internal fixation for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures via locking plate (Group A), lateral locking condylar plate and medial contoured reconstruction plate (Group B), and lateral locking condylar plate and anterior reconstruction plate (Group C). Knee joint functional recovery and functional outcomes were evaluated 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients included 34 men and 24 women aged 25 to 74 years (mean, 50.3 ± 10.73 years). Operating times were longest in Group B and similar in Groups A and C. Bleeding volume in Group A was smaller than in Group B and similar to that of Group C. Functional outcomes were excellent in 18 (31%) fractures, good in 24 (41%), moderate in 11 (19%), and poor in 5 (9%). Good-to-excellent results were achieved in 56%, 82%, and 83% of patients (Groups A, B, and C, respectively). Groups B and C's outcomes were superior to Group A's outcomes. No significant difference in postoperative complications between the groups existed. CONCLUSION: Lateral locking condylar and anterior reconstruction plating was useful for complex type C distal femoral fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8150468 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81504682021-06-07 Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair Zhang, Yadi Xing, Baorui Hou, Xiuxiu Li, Yunmei Li, Guoliang Han, Guangpu Li, Dongyue J Int Med Res Clinical Research Report BACKGROUND: We compared the outcomes of three fixation techniques for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures. METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed patients undergoing internal fixation for Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fractures via locking plate (Group A), lateral locking condylar plate and medial contoured reconstruction plate (Group B), and lateral locking condylar plate and anterior reconstruction plate (Group C). Knee joint functional recovery and functional outcomes were evaluated 12 months postoperatively. RESULTS: Patients included 34 men and 24 women aged 25 to 74 years (mean, 50.3 ± 10.73 years). Operating times were longest in Group B and similar in Groups A and C. Bleeding volume in Group A was smaller than in Group B and similar to that of Group C. Functional outcomes were excellent in 18 (31%) fractures, good in 24 (41%), moderate in 11 (19%), and poor in 5 (9%). Good-to-excellent results were achieved in 56%, 82%, and 83% of patients (Groups A, B, and C, respectively). Groups B and C's outcomes were superior to Group A's outcomes. No significant difference in postoperative complications between the groups existed. CONCLUSION: Lateral locking condylar and anterior reconstruction plating was useful for complex type C distal femoral fractures. SAGE Publications 2021-05-22 /pmc/articles/PMC8150468/ /pubmed/34024192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211015031 Text en © The Author(s) 2021 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Clinical Research Report Zhang, Yadi Xing, Baorui Hou, Xiuxiu Li, Yunmei Li, Guoliang Han, Guangpu Li, Dongyue Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair |
title | Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair |
title_full | Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair |
title_fullStr | Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair |
title_short | Comparison of three methods of Müller type C2 and C3 distal femoral fracture repair |
title_sort | comparison of three methods of müller type c2 and c3 distal femoral fracture repair |
topic | Clinical Research Report |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8150468/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34024192 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/03000605211015031 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT zhangyadi comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair AT xingbaorui comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair AT houxiuxiu comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair AT liyunmei comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair AT liguoliang comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair AT hanguangpu comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair AT lidongyue comparisonofthreemethodsofmullertypec2andc3distalfemoralfracturerepair |