Cargando…
Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma
Gynecologic melanomas are rare and have a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapy has greatly improved the systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM) in recent years, its efficacy in gynecologic melanomas remains uncertain because of the rarity o...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8151394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050403 |
_version_ | 1783698372535779328 |
---|---|
author | Anko, Mayuka Kobayashi, Yusuke Banno, Kouji Aoki, Daisuke |
author_facet | Anko, Mayuka Kobayashi, Yusuke Banno, Kouji Aoki, Daisuke |
author_sort | Anko, Mayuka |
collection | PubMed |
description | Gynecologic melanomas are rare and have a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapy has greatly improved the systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM) in recent years, its efficacy in gynecologic melanomas remains uncertain because of the rarity of this malignancy and its scarce literature. This review aimed to evaluate the literature of gynecologic melanomas treated with immunotherapy and targeted therapy through a PubMed search. We identified one study focusing on the overall survival of gynecologic melanomas separately and five case series and nine case reports concentrating on gynecologic melanomas treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and/or targeted therapy. Furthermore, the KIT mutation has the highest rate among all mutations in mucosal melanoma types. The KIT inhibitors (Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: TKIs) imatinib and nilotinib could be the treatment options. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with KIT inhibitors may potentially treat cases of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, because of the different conditions and a small number of cases, it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for gynecologic melanoma rigorously at this time. Further prospective cohort or randomized trials of gynecologic melanoma alone are needed to assess the treatment with solid evidence. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8151394 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81513942021-05-27 Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma Anko, Mayuka Kobayashi, Yusuke Banno, Kouji Aoki, Daisuke J Pers Med Review Gynecologic melanomas are rare and have a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapy has greatly improved the systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM) in recent years, its efficacy in gynecologic melanomas remains uncertain because of the rarity of this malignancy and its scarce literature. This review aimed to evaluate the literature of gynecologic melanomas treated with immunotherapy and targeted therapy through a PubMed search. We identified one study focusing on the overall survival of gynecologic melanomas separately and five case series and nine case reports concentrating on gynecologic melanomas treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and/or targeted therapy. Furthermore, the KIT mutation has the highest rate among all mutations in mucosal melanoma types. The KIT inhibitors (Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: TKIs) imatinib and nilotinib could be the treatment options. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with KIT inhibitors may potentially treat cases of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, because of the different conditions and a small number of cases, it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for gynecologic melanoma rigorously at this time. Further prospective cohort or randomized trials of gynecologic melanoma alone are needed to assess the treatment with solid evidence. MDPI 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8151394/ /pubmed/34065883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050403 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Review Anko, Mayuka Kobayashi, Yusuke Banno, Kouji Aoki, Daisuke Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma |
title | Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma |
title_full | Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma |
title_fullStr | Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma |
title_full_unstemmed | Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma |
title_short | Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma |
title_sort | current status and prospects of immunotherapy for gynecologic melanoma |
topic | Review |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8151394/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050403 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ankomayuka currentstatusandprospectsofimmunotherapyforgynecologicmelanoma AT kobayashiyusuke currentstatusandprospectsofimmunotherapyforgynecologicmelanoma AT bannokouji currentstatusandprospectsofimmunotherapyforgynecologicmelanoma AT aokidaisuke currentstatusandprospectsofimmunotherapyforgynecologicmelanoma |