Cargando…

Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma

Gynecologic melanomas are rare and have a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapy has greatly improved the systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM) in recent years, its efficacy in gynecologic melanomas remains uncertain because of the rarity o...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Anko, Mayuka, Kobayashi, Yusuke, Banno, Kouji, Aoki, Daisuke
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8151394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065883
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050403
_version_ 1783698372535779328
author Anko, Mayuka
Kobayashi, Yusuke
Banno, Kouji
Aoki, Daisuke
author_facet Anko, Mayuka
Kobayashi, Yusuke
Banno, Kouji
Aoki, Daisuke
author_sort Anko, Mayuka
collection PubMed
description Gynecologic melanomas are rare and have a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapy has greatly improved the systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM) in recent years, its efficacy in gynecologic melanomas remains uncertain because of the rarity of this malignancy and its scarce literature. This review aimed to evaluate the literature of gynecologic melanomas treated with immunotherapy and targeted therapy through a PubMed search. We identified one study focusing on the overall survival of gynecologic melanomas separately and five case series and nine case reports concentrating on gynecologic melanomas treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and/or targeted therapy. Furthermore, the KIT mutation has the highest rate among all mutations in mucosal melanoma types. The KIT inhibitors (Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: TKIs) imatinib and nilotinib could be the treatment options. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with KIT inhibitors may potentially treat cases of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, because of the different conditions and a small number of cases, it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for gynecologic melanoma rigorously at this time. Further prospective cohort or randomized trials of gynecologic melanoma alone are needed to assess the treatment with solid evidence.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8151394
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81513942021-05-27 Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma Anko, Mayuka Kobayashi, Yusuke Banno, Kouji Aoki, Daisuke J Pers Med Review Gynecologic melanomas are rare and have a poor prognosis. Although immunotherapy (immune checkpoint inhibitors) and targeted therapy has greatly improved the systemic treatment of cutaneous melanoma (CM) in recent years, its efficacy in gynecologic melanomas remains uncertain because of the rarity of this malignancy and its scarce literature. This review aimed to evaluate the literature of gynecologic melanomas treated with immunotherapy and targeted therapy through a PubMed search. We identified one study focusing on the overall survival of gynecologic melanomas separately and five case series and nine case reports concentrating on gynecologic melanomas treated with an immune checkpoint inhibitor and/or targeted therapy. Furthermore, the KIT mutation has the highest rate among all mutations in mucosal melanoma types. The KIT inhibitors (Tyrosine kinase inhibitors: TKIs) imatinib and nilotinib could be the treatment options. Moreover, immune checkpoint inhibitors combined with KIT inhibitors may potentially treat cases of resistance to immune checkpoint inhibitors. However, because of the different conditions and a small number of cases, it is difficult to evaluate the efficacy of immunotherapy and targeted therapy for gynecologic melanoma rigorously at this time. Further prospective cohort or randomized trials of gynecologic melanoma alone are needed to assess the treatment with solid evidence. MDPI 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8151394/ /pubmed/34065883 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050403 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Review
Anko, Mayuka
Kobayashi, Yusuke
Banno, Kouji
Aoki, Daisuke
Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma
title Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma
title_full Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma
title_fullStr Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma
title_full_unstemmed Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma
title_short Current Status and Prospects of Immunotherapy for Gynecologic Melanoma
title_sort current status and prospects of immunotherapy for gynecologic melanoma
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8151394/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065883
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jpm11050403
work_keys_str_mv AT ankomayuka currentstatusandprospectsofimmunotherapyforgynecologicmelanoma
AT kobayashiyusuke currentstatusandprospectsofimmunotherapyforgynecologicmelanoma
AT bannokouji currentstatusandprospectsofimmunotherapyforgynecologicmelanoma
AT aokidaisuke currentstatusandprospectsofimmunotherapyforgynecologicmelanoma