Cargando…

Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer

SIMPLE SUMMARY: IMAGiC model is the model consisting of four-gene and PD-L1 expression levels to predict immunotherapy response. The IMAGiC model’s predictive performance was validated in patients with several advanced tumor types in this study. The PFS and OS demonstrated significant differences be...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Jin-Chul, Heo, You-Jeong, Kang, So-Young, Lee, Jeeyun, Kim, Kyoung-Mee
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8151730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102316
_version_ 1783698452305149952
author Kim, Jin-Chul
Heo, You-Jeong
Kang, So-Young
Lee, Jeeyun
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
author_facet Kim, Jin-Chul
Heo, You-Jeong
Kang, So-Young
Lee, Jeeyun
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
author_sort Kim, Jin-Chul
collection PubMed
description SIMPLE SUMMARY: IMAGiC model is the model consisting of four-gene and PD-L1 expression levels to predict immunotherapy response. The IMAGiC model’s predictive performance was validated in patients with several advanced tumor types in this study. The PFS and OS demonstrated significant differences between the dichotomous IMAGiC groups. IMAGiC group could be utilized as a binary biomarker for predicting response to immunotherapy regardless of TMB level or MSI status. ABSTRACT: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce durable responses in patients with multiple types of advanced cancer, only a limited number of patients have a known reliable biomarker. This study aimed to validate the IMmunotherapy Against GastrIc Cancer (IMAGiC) model, which was developed based on a previous study of four-gene and PD-L1 level, to predict immunotherapy response. We developed a clinical assay for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to measure the expression level of the previously published four-gene set. The predictive performance was validated in a cohort of 89 patients with several advanced tumor types. The IMAGiC score was derived from tumor samples of 89 patients consisting of eight cancer types, and 73 out of 89 patients available for clinical response were analyzed with clinicopathological factors. The IMAGiC group (responder vs. non-responder) was determined with a specific value of the IMAGiC score as a cutoff, which was set by log-rank statistics for progression-free survival (PFS) divided the patients into 56 (76.7%) non-responders and 17 (23.3%) responders. Clinical responders (complete response/partial response) were higher in the IMAGiC responder group than in the non-responder group (70.6 vs. 21.4%). The median PFS of the IMAGiC responder group and non-responder was 20.8 months (95% CI 9.1-not reached) and 6.7 months (95% CI 4.9–11.1, p = 0.007), respectively. Among the 17 IMAGiC responders, 11 patients had tumor mutation burden-low and microsatellite-stable tumors. This study validated a predictive model based on a four-gene expression signature. Along with conventional biomarkers, our model could be useful for predicting response to immunotherapy in patients with advanced cancer.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8151730
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81517302021-05-27 Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer Kim, Jin-Chul Heo, You-Jeong Kang, So-Young Lee, Jeeyun Kim, Kyoung-Mee Cancers (Basel) Article SIMPLE SUMMARY: IMAGiC model is the model consisting of four-gene and PD-L1 expression levels to predict immunotherapy response. The IMAGiC model’s predictive performance was validated in patients with several advanced tumor types in this study. The PFS and OS demonstrated significant differences between the dichotomous IMAGiC groups. IMAGiC group could be utilized as a binary biomarker for predicting response to immunotherapy regardless of TMB level or MSI status. ABSTRACT: Although immune checkpoint inhibitors can induce durable responses in patients with multiple types of advanced cancer, only a limited number of patients have a known reliable biomarker. This study aimed to validate the IMmunotherapy Against GastrIc Cancer (IMAGiC) model, which was developed based on a previous study of four-gene and PD-L1 level, to predict immunotherapy response. We developed a clinical assay for formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples using quantitative real-time polymerase chain reaction to measure the expression level of the previously published four-gene set. The predictive performance was validated in a cohort of 89 patients with several advanced tumor types. The IMAGiC score was derived from tumor samples of 89 patients consisting of eight cancer types, and 73 out of 89 patients available for clinical response were analyzed with clinicopathological factors. The IMAGiC group (responder vs. non-responder) was determined with a specific value of the IMAGiC score as a cutoff, which was set by log-rank statistics for progression-free survival (PFS) divided the patients into 56 (76.7%) non-responders and 17 (23.3%) responders. Clinical responders (complete response/partial response) were higher in the IMAGiC responder group than in the non-responder group (70.6 vs. 21.4%). The median PFS of the IMAGiC responder group and non-responder was 20.8 months (95% CI 9.1-not reached) and 6.7 months (95% CI 4.9–11.1, p = 0.007), respectively. Among the 17 IMAGiC responders, 11 patients had tumor mutation burden-low and microsatellite-stable tumors. This study validated a predictive model based on a four-gene expression signature. Along with conventional biomarkers, our model could be useful for predicting response to immunotherapy in patients with advanced cancer. MDPI 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8151730/ /pubmed/34065963 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102316 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Jin-Chul
Heo, You-Jeong
Kang, So-Young
Lee, Jeeyun
Kim, Kyoung-Mee
Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer
title Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer
title_full Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer
title_fullStr Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer
title_short Validation of the Combined Biomarker for Prediction of Response to Checkpoint Inhibitor in Patients with Advanced Cancer
title_sort validation of the combined biomarker for prediction of response to checkpoint inhibitor in patients with advanced cancer
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8151730/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34065963
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/cancers13102316
work_keys_str_mv AT kimjinchul validationofthecombinedbiomarkerforpredictionofresponsetocheckpointinhibitorinpatientswithadvancedcancer
AT heoyoujeong validationofthecombinedbiomarkerforpredictionofresponsetocheckpointinhibitorinpatientswithadvancedcancer
AT kangsoyoung validationofthecombinedbiomarkerforpredictionofresponsetocheckpointinhibitorinpatientswithadvancedcancer
AT leejeeyun validationofthecombinedbiomarkerforpredictionofresponsetocheckpointinhibitorinpatientswithadvancedcancer
AT kimkyoungmee validationofthecombinedbiomarkerforpredictionofresponsetocheckpointinhibitorinpatientswithadvancedcancer