Cargando…

Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone

Most commercial prosthetic hands lack closed-loop feedback, thus, a lot of research has been focusing on implementing sensory feedback systems to provide the user with sensory information during activities of daily living. This study evaluates the possibilities of using a microphone and electrotacti...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Svensson, Pamela, Antfolk, Christian, Björkman, Anders, Malešević, Nebojša
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21103384
_version_ 1783698526177329152
author Svensson, Pamela
Antfolk, Christian
Björkman, Anders
Malešević, Nebojša
author_facet Svensson, Pamela
Antfolk, Christian
Björkman, Anders
Malešević, Nebojša
author_sort Svensson, Pamela
collection PubMed
description Most commercial prosthetic hands lack closed-loop feedback, thus, a lot of research has been focusing on implementing sensory feedback systems to provide the user with sensory information during activities of daily living. This study evaluates the possibilities of using a microphone and electrotactile feedback to identify different textures. A condenser microphone was used as a sensor to detect the friction sound generated from the contact between different textures and the microphone. The generated signal was processed to provide a characteristic electrical stimulation presented to the participants. The main goal of the processing was to derive a continuous and intuitive transfer function between the microphone signal and stimulation frequency. Twelve able-bodied volunteers participated in the study, in which they were asked to identify the stroked texture (among four used in this study: Felt, sponge, silicone rubber, and string mesh) using only electrotactile feedback. The experiments were done in three phases: (1) Training, (2) with-feedback, (3) without-feedback. Each texture was stroked 20 times each during all three phases. The results show that the participants were able to differentiate between different textures, with a median accuracy of 85%, by using only electrotactile feedback with the stimulation frequency being the only variable parameter.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8152043
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81520432021-05-27 Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone Svensson, Pamela Antfolk, Christian Björkman, Anders Malešević, Nebojša Sensors (Basel) Article Most commercial prosthetic hands lack closed-loop feedback, thus, a lot of research has been focusing on implementing sensory feedback systems to provide the user with sensory information during activities of daily living. This study evaluates the possibilities of using a microphone and electrotactile feedback to identify different textures. A condenser microphone was used as a sensor to detect the friction sound generated from the contact between different textures and the microphone. The generated signal was processed to provide a characteristic electrical stimulation presented to the participants. The main goal of the processing was to derive a continuous and intuitive transfer function between the microphone signal and stimulation frequency. Twelve able-bodied volunteers participated in the study, in which they were asked to identify the stroked texture (among four used in this study: Felt, sponge, silicone rubber, and string mesh) using only electrotactile feedback. The experiments were done in three phases: (1) Training, (2) with-feedback, (3) without-feedback. Each texture was stroked 20 times each during all three phases. The results show that the participants were able to differentiate between different textures, with a median accuracy of 85%, by using only electrotactile feedback with the stimulation frequency being the only variable parameter. MDPI 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8152043/ /pubmed/34066279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21103384 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Svensson, Pamela
Antfolk, Christian
Björkman, Anders
Malešević, Nebojša
Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone
title Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone
title_full Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone
title_fullStr Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone
title_full_unstemmed Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone
title_short Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone
title_sort electrotactile feedback for the discrimination of different surface textures using a microphone
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152043/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066279
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21103384
work_keys_str_mv AT svenssonpamela electrotactilefeedbackforthediscriminationofdifferentsurfacetexturesusingamicrophone
AT antfolkchristian electrotactilefeedbackforthediscriminationofdifferentsurfacetexturesusingamicrophone
AT bjorkmananders electrotactilefeedbackforthediscriminationofdifferentsurfacetexturesusingamicrophone
AT malesevicnebojsa electrotactilefeedbackforthediscriminationofdifferentsurfacetexturesusingamicrophone