Cargando…
Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone
Most commercial prosthetic hands lack closed-loop feedback, thus, a lot of research has been focusing on implementing sensory feedback systems to provide the user with sensory information during activities of daily living. This study evaluates the possibilities of using a microphone and electrotacti...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21103384 |
_version_ | 1783698526177329152 |
---|---|
author | Svensson, Pamela Antfolk, Christian Björkman, Anders Malešević, Nebojša |
author_facet | Svensson, Pamela Antfolk, Christian Björkman, Anders Malešević, Nebojša |
author_sort | Svensson, Pamela |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most commercial prosthetic hands lack closed-loop feedback, thus, a lot of research has been focusing on implementing sensory feedback systems to provide the user with sensory information during activities of daily living. This study evaluates the possibilities of using a microphone and electrotactile feedback to identify different textures. A condenser microphone was used as a sensor to detect the friction sound generated from the contact between different textures and the microphone. The generated signal was processed to provide a characteristic electrical stimulation presented to the participants. The main goal of the processing was to derive a continuous and intuitive transfer function between the microphone signal and stimulation frequency. Twelve able-bodied volunteers participated in the study, in which they were asked to identify the stroked texture (among four used in this study: Felt, sponge, silicone rubber, and string mesh) using only electrotactile feedback. The experiments were done in three phases: (1) Training, (2) with-feedback, (3) without-feedback. Each texture was stroked 20 times each during all three phases. The results show that the participants were able to differentiate between different textures, with a median accuracy of 85%, by using only electrotactile feedback with the stimulation frequency being the only variable parameter. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8152043 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81520432021-05-27 Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone Svensson, Pamela Antfolk, Christian Björkman, Anders Malešević, Nebojša Sensors (Basel) Article Most commercial prosthetic hands lack closed-loop feedback, thus, a lot of research has been focusing on implementing sensory feedback systems to provide the user with sensory information during activities of daily living. This study evaluates the possibilities of using a microphone and electrotactile feedback to identify different textures. A condenser microphone was used as a sensor to detect the friction sound generated from the contact between different textures and the microphone. The generated signal was processed to provide a characteristic electrical stimulation presented to the participants. The main goal of the processing was to derive a continuous and intuitive transfer function between the microphone signal and stimulation frequency. Twelve able-bodied volunteers participated in the study, in which they were asked to identify the stroked texture (among four used in this study: Felt, sponge, silicone rubber, and string mesh) using only electrotactile feedback. The experiments were done in three phases: (1) Training, (2) with-feedback, (3) without-feedback. Each texture was stroked 20 times each during all three phases. The results show that the participants were able to differentiate between different textures, with a median accuracy of 85%, by using only electrotactile feedback with the stimulation frequency being the only variable parameter. MDPI 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8152043/ /pubmed/34066279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21103384 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Svensson, Pamela Antfolk, Christian Björkman, Anders Malešević, Nebojša Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone |
title | Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone |
title_full | Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone |
title_fullStr | Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone |
title_full_unstemmed | Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone |
title_short | Electrotactile Feedback for the Discrimination of Different Surface Textures Using a Microphone |
title_sort | electrotactile feedback for the discrimination of different surface textures using a microphone |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152043/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066279 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s21103384 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT svenssonpamela electrotactilefeedbackforthediscriminationofdifferentsurfacetexturesusingamicrophone AT antfolkchristian electrotactilefeedbackforthediscriminationofdifferentsurfacetexturesusingamicrophone AT bjorkmananders electrotactilefeedbackforthediscriminationofdifferentsurfacetexturesusingamicrophone AT malesevicnebojsa electrotactilefeedbackforthediscriminationofdifferentsurfacetexturesusingamicrophone |