Cargando…
A Comparison among Different Ways to Investigate Composite Materials with Lock-In Thermography: The Multi-Frequency Approach
The main goal of non-destructive testing is the detection of defects early enough to avoid catastrophic failure with particular interest for the inspection of aerospace structures; under this aspect, all methods for fast and reliable inspection deserve special attention. In this sense, active thermo...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
MDPI
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066293 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14102525 |
_version_ | 1783698537811279872 |
---|---|
author | D’Accardi, Ester Palumbo, Davide Galietti, Umberto |
author_facet | D’Accardi, Ester Palumbo, Davide Galietti, Umberto |
author_sort | D’Accardi, Ester |
collection | PubMed |
description | The main goal of non-destructive testing is the detection of defects early enough to avoid catastrophic failure with particular interest for the inspection of aerospace structures; under this aspect, all methods for fast and reliable inspection deserve special attention. In this sense, active thermography for non-destructive testing enables contactless, fast, remote, and not expensive control of materials and structures. Furthermore, different works have confirmed the potentials of lock-in thermography as a flexible technique for its peculiarity to be performed by means of a low-cost set-up. In this work, a new approach called the multi-frequency via software approach (MFS), based on the superimposition via software of two square waves with two different main excitation frequencies, has been used to inspect a sample in carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) material with imposed defects of different materials, sizes and depths, by means of lock-in thermography. The advantages and disadvantages of the multi-frequency approach have been highlighted by comparing quantitatively the MFS with the traditional excitation methods (sine and square waves). |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8152101 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | MDPI |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81521012021-05-27 A Comparison among Different Ways to Investigate Composite Materials with Lock-In Thermography: The Multi-Frequency Approach D’Accardi, Ester Palumbo, Davide Galietti, Umberto Materials (Basel) Article The main goal of non-destructive testing is the detection of defects early enough to avoid catastrophic failure with particular interest for the inspection of aerospace structures; under this aspect, all methods for fast and reliable inspection deserve special attention. In this sense, active thermography for non-destructive testing enables contactless, fast, remote, and not expensive control of materials and structures. Furthermore, different works have confirmed the potentials of lock-in thermography as a flexible technique for its peculiarity to be performed by means of a low-cost set-up. In this work, a new approach called the multi-frequency via software approach (MFS), based on the superimposition via software of two square waves with two different main excitation frequencies, has been used to inspect a sample in carbon fiber reinforced polymers (CFRP) material with imposed defects of different materials, sizes and depths, by means of lock-in thermography. The advantages and disadvantages of the multi-frequency approach have been highlighted by comparing quantitatively the MFS with the traditional excitation methods (sine and square waves). MDPI 2021-05-12 /pmc/articles/PMC8152101/ /pubmed/34066293 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14102525 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article D’Accardi, Ester Palumbo, Davide Galietti, Umberto A Comparison among Different Ways to Investigate Composite Materials with Lock-In Thermography: The Multi-Frequency Approach |
title | A Comparison among Different Ways to Investigate Composite Materials with Lock-In Thermography: The Multi-Frequency Approach |
title_full | A Comparison among Different Ways to Investigate Composite Materials with Lock-In Thermography: The Multi-Frequency Approach |
title_fullStr | A Comparison among Different Ways to Investigate Composite Materials with Lock-In Thermography: The Multi-Frequency Approach |
title_full_unstemmed | A Comparison among Different Ways to Investigate Composite Materials with Lock-In Thermography: The Multi-Frequency Approach |
title_short | A Comparison among Different Ways to Investigate Composite Materials with Lock-In Thermography: The Multi-Frequency Approach |
title_sort | comparison among different ways to investigate composite materials with lock-in thermography: the multi-frequency approach |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152101/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34066293 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ma14102525 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT daccardiester acomparisonamongdifferentwaystoinvestigatecompositematerialswithlockinthermographythemultifrequencyapproach AT palumbodavide acomparisonamongdifferentwaystoinvestigatecompositematerialswithlockinthermographythemultifrequencyapproach AT galiettiumberto acomparisonamongdifferentwaystoinvestigatecompositematerialswithlockinthermographythemultifrequencyapproach AT daccardiester comparisonamongdifferentwaystoinvestigatecompositematerialswithlockinthermographythemultifrequencyapproach AT palumbodavide comparisonamongdifferentwaystoinvestigatecompositematerialswithlockinthermographythemultifrequencyapproach AT galiettiumberto comparisonamongdifferentwaystoinvestigatecompositematerialswithlockinthermographythemultifrequencyapproach |