Cargando…
Gemcitabine Plus Platinum versus Docetaxel Plus Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Study
BACKGROUND: A well-established first-line chemotherapy standard for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma is yet lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus platinum versus docetaxel plus platinum regimen as first-line therapies for distal metastatic nasopharyngeal carc...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2021
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084103 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_471_20 |
_version_ | 1783698592659144704 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Hui Lu, Ying Xu, Zhuohua Wei, Mingjing Huang, Haixin |
author_facet | Yang, Hui Lu, Ying Xu, Zhuohua Wei, Mingjing Huang, Haixin |
author_sort | Yang, Hui |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A well-established first-line chemotherapy standard for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma is yet lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus platinum versus docetaxel plus platinum regimen as first-line therapies for distal metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A single center, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study. The study included 120 patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who met the study requirements. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio through a sealed envelope selection. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2)/d intravenously (IV) for >30 min (days 1 and 8) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2)/d IV for 1 h (day 1) were administered to the respective group participants. Nedaplatin 75 mg/m(2)/d, IV (day 1), cisplatin 75 mg/m(2)/d IV (day 1) or carboplatin (area under the curve set as 5) IV (day 1) were used in both groups. One cycle duration was 21 days, with 4–6 cycles for all participants. OUTCOMES: The primary assessed outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were short-term efficacy [i.e., response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR)] and safety. RESULTS: Seven patients withdrew from the study, and efficacy and adverse reactions were obtained for 113 patients (gemcitabine: 56; docetaxel: 57). Compared with the docetaxel plus platinum group, the gemcitabine plus platinum group had significantly higher RR (71.4% vs. 52.6%, P < 0.05); mPFS (9.7 vs. 7.8 months, P < 0.05), and mOS (20.6 vs. 16.8 months, P < 0.01). The significance was not associated with increased adverse reactions, as both groups showed similar Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions (P > 0.05). DCR was non-significantly higher in the gemcitabine group (85.7% vs. 75.4%, P > 0.05). Multivariable analysis revealed that time to disease progression, number of involved organs, liver metastasis, and grouping were associated with mPFS and mOS (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine with platinum is likely superior to that of docetaxel with platinum as first-line treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8152382 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81523822021-06-02 Gemcitabine Plus Platinum versus Docetaxel Plus Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Study Yang, Hui Lu, Ying Xu, Zhuohua Wei, Mingjing Huang, Haixin Saudi J Med Med Sci Original Article BACKGROUND: A well-established first-line chemotherapy standard for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma is yet lacking. OBJECTIVES: To compare the efficacy and safety of gemcitabine plus platinum versus docetaxel plus platinum regimen as first-line therapies for distal metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. STUDY DESIGN AND PARTICIPANTS: A single center, randomized, open-label, parallel-arm study. The study included 120 patients with metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma who met the study requirements. INTERVENTIONS: Participants were randomized in a 1:1 ratio through a sealed envelope selection. Gemcitabine 1000 mg/m(2)/d intravenously (IV) for >30 min (days 1 and 8) or docetaxel 75 mg/m(2)/d IV for 1 h (day 1) were administered to the respective group participants. Nedaplatin 75 mg/m(2)/d, IV (day 1), cisplatin 75 mg/m(2)/d IV (day 1) or carboplatin (area under the curve set as 5) IV (day 1) were used in both groups. One cycle duration was 21 days, with 4–6 cycles for all participants. OUTCOMES: The primary assessed outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS), and the secondary outcomes were short-term efficacy [i.e., response rate (RR) and disease control rate (DCR)] and safety. RESULTS: Seven patients withdrew from the study, and efficacy and adverse reactions were obtained for 113 patients (gemcitabine: 56; docetaxel: 57). Compared with the docetaxel plus platinum group, the gemcitabine plus platinum group had significantly higher RR (71.4% vs. 52.6%, P < 0.05); mPFS (9.7 vs. 7.8 months, P < 0.05), and mOS (20.6 vs. 16.8 months, P < 0.01). The significance was not associated with increased adverse reactions, as both groups showed similar Grades 3 and 4 adverse reactions (P > 0.05). DCR was non-significantly higher in the gemcitabine group (85.7% vs. 75.4%, P > 0.05). Multivariable analysis revealed that time to disease progression, number of involved organs, liver metastasis, and grouping were associated with mPFS and mOS (all P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: The combination of gemcitabine with platinum is likely superior to that of docetaxel with platinum as first-line treatment for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2021 2021-04-29 /pmc/articles/PMC8152382/ /pubmed/34084103 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_471_20 Text en Copyright: © 2021 Saudi Journal of Medicine & Medical Sciences https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0/This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Yang, Hui Lu, Ying Xu, Zhuohua Wei, Mingjing Huang, Haixin Gemcitabine Plus Platinum versus Docetaxel Plus Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title | Gemcitabine Plus Platinum versus Docetaxel Plus Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_full | Gemcitabine Plus Platinum versus Docetaxel Plus Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_fullStr | Gemcitabine Plus Platinum versus Docetaxel Plus Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Gemcitabine Plus Platinum versus Docetaxel Plus Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_short | Gemcitabine Plus Platinum versus Docetaxel Plus Platinum as First-Line Therapy for Metastatic Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma: A Randomized Clinical Study |
title_sort | gemcitabine plus platinum versus docetaxel plus platinum as first-line therapy for metastatic nasopharyngeal carcinoma: a randomized clinical study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152382/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34084103 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/sjmms.sjmms_471_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yanghui gemcitabineplusplatinumversusdocetaxelplusplatinumasfirstlinetherapyformetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaarandomizedclinicalstudy AT luying gemcitabineplusplatinumversusdocetaxelplusplatinumasfirstlinetherapyformetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaarandomizedclinicalstudy AT xuzhuohua gemcitabineplusplatinumversusdocetaxelplusplatinumasfirstlinetherapyformetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaarandomizedclinicalstudy AT weimingjing gemcitabineplusplatinumversusdocetaxelplusplatinumasfirstlinetherapyformetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaarandomizedclinicalstudy AT huanghaixin gemcitabineplusplatinumversusdocetaxelplusplatinumasfirstlinetherapyformetastaticnasopharyngealcarcinomaarandomizedclinicalstudy |