Cargando…

Does an Antibiotic Stewardship Applied in a Pig Farm Lead to Low ESBL Prevalence?

Background. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence of intestinal carriage of colistin-resistant and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales among pigs from a Swiss farm attending an animal health and antibiotic stewardship program and to det...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fournier, Claudine, Nordmann, Patrice, Pittet, Olivier, Poirel, Laurent
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050574
_version_ 1783698610170363904
author Fournier, Claudine
Nordmann, Patrice
Pittet, Olivier
Poirel, Laurent
author_facet Fournier, Claudine
Nordmann, Patrice
Pittet, Olivier
Poirel, Laurent
author_sort Fournier, Claudine
collection PubMed
description Background. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence of intestinal carriage of colistin-resistant and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales among pigs from a Swiss farm attending an animal health and antibiotic stewardship program and to determine the associated mechanisms of resistance. Materials/Methods. Eighty-one fecal samples were recovered and screened for either β-lactam-resistant, colistin-resistant, or aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacterales, using respective screening media. All recovered isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and their clonal relationship (PFGE and MLST). Plasmid typing was performed by plasmid-based replicon typing (PBRT). Resistance genes were searched by PCR and sequencing. Results. A total of 38 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and a single ESBL-producing Enterobacter cloacae were recovered from 81 pigs, corresponding to a prevalence of 50%, no other β-lactamase producer being identified. Among the 38 ESBL-producing E. coli, all belonged to sequence type (ST) ST10, except two ST34 and ST744 isolates. Among the ST10-bla(CTX-M-1) isolates, three subclones (n = 22, n = 13, and n = 1, respectively) were identified according to the PFGE analysis. The most commonly identified IncI1 plasmid harboring the bla(CTX-M-1) gene was 143 kb in size and coharbored other resistance genes. Only three colistin-resistant Enterobacterales isolates were recovered, namely two Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates and a single E. cloacae isolate. Screening for the plasmid-borne mcr-1 to mcr-9 genes in these three isolates gave negative results. The two K. pneumoniae isolates were clonally related, belonged to ST76, and harbored a truncated mgrB chromosomal gene being the source of colistin resistance. Conclusion. A high prevalence of fecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli was found, being mainly caused by the spread of a clonal lineage within the farm. By contrast, a low prevalence of colistin-resistant Enterobacterales was found.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8152456
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81524562021-05-27 Does an Antibiotic Stewardship Applied in a Pig Farm Lead to Low ESBL Prevalence? Fournier, Claudine Nordmann, Patrice Pittet, Olivier Poirel, Laurent Antibiotics (Basel) Article Background. The aim of the present study was to prospectively evaluate the prevalence of intestinal carriage of colistin-resistant and extended-spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL)-producing Enterobacterales among pigs from a Swiss farm attending an animal health and antibiotic stewardship program and to determine the associated mechanisms of resistance. Materials/Methods. Eighty-one fecal samples were recovered and screened for either β-lactam-resistant, colistin-resistant, or aminoglycoside-resistant Enterobacterales, using respective screening media. All recovered isolates were tested for antimicrobial susceptibility and their clonal relationship (PFGE and MLST). Plasmid typing was performed by plasmid-based replicon typing (PBRT). Resistance genes were searched by PCR and sequencing. Results. A total of 38 ESBL-producing Escherichia coli and a single ESBL-producing Enterobacter cloacae were recovered from 81 pigs, corresponding to a prevalence of 50%, no other β-lactamase producer being identified. Among the 38 ESBL-producing E. coli, all belonged to sequence type (ST) ST10, except two ST34 and ST744 isolates. Among the ST10-bla(CTX-M-1) isolates, three subclones (n = 22, n = 13, and n = 1, respectively) were identified according to the PFGE analysis. The most commonly identified IncI1 plasmid harboring the bla(CTX-M-1) gene was 143 kb in size and coharbored other resistance genes. Only three colistin-resistant Enterobacterales isolates were recovered, namely two Klebsiella pneumoniae isolates and a single E. cloacae isolate. Screening for the plasmid-borne mcr-1 to mcr-9 genes in these three isolates gave negative results. The two K. pneumoniae isolates were clonally related, belonged to ST76, and harbored a truncated mgrB chromosomal gene being the source of colistin resistance. Conclusion. A high prevalence of fecal carriage of ESBL-producing E. coli was found, being mainly caused by the spread of a clonal lineage within the farm. By contrast, a low prevalence of colistin-resistant Enterobacterales was found. MDPI 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8152456/ /pubmed/34068027 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050574 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Fournier, Claudine
Nordmann, Patrice
Pittet, Olivier
Poirel, Laurent
Does an Antibiotic Stewardship Applied in a Pig Farm Lead to Low ESBL Prevalence?
title Does an Antibiotic Stewardship Applied in a Pig Farm Lead to Low ESBL Prevalence?
title_full Does an Antibiotic Stewardship Applied in a Pig Farm Lead to Low ESBL Prevalence?
title_fullStr Does an Antibiotic Stewardship Applied in a Pig Farm Lead to Low ESBL Prevalence?
title_full_unstemmed Does an Antibiotic Stewardship Applied in a Pig Farm Lead to Low ESBL Prevalence?
title_short Does an Antibiotic Stewardship Applied in a Pig Farm Lead to Low ESBL Prevalence?
title_sort does an antibiotic stewardship applied in a pig farm lead to low esbl prevalence?
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152456/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068027
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics10050574
work_keys_str_mv AT fournierclaudine doesanantibioticstewardshipappliedinapigfarmleadtolowesblprevalence
AT nordmannpatrice doesanantibioticstewardshipappliedinapigfarmleadtolowesblprevalence
AT pittetolivier doesanantibioticstewardshipappliedinapigfarmleadtolowesblprevalence
AT poirellaurent doesanantibioticstewardshipappliedinapigfarmleadtolowesblprevalence