Cargando…

Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users

In the case of hearing loss, cochlear implants (CI) allow for the restoration of hearing. Despite the advantages of CIs for speech perception, CI users still complain about their poor perception of their auditory environment. Aiming to assess non-verbal auditory perception in CI users, we developed...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pralus, Agathe, Hermann, Ruben, Cholvy, Fanny, Aguera, Pierre-Emmanuel, Moulin, Annie, Barone, Pascal, Grimault, Nicolas, Truy, Eric, Tillmann, Barbara, Caclin, Anne
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068067
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102093
_version_ 1783698620210479104
author Pralus, Agathe
Hermann, Ruben
Cholvy, Fanny
Aguera, Pierre-Emmanuel
Moulin, Annie
Barone, Pascal
Grimault, Nicolas
Truy, Eric
Tillmann, Barbara
Caclin, Anne
author_facet Pralus, Agathe
Hermann, Ruben
Cholvy, Fanny
Aguera, Pierre-Emmanuel
Moulin, Annie
Barone, Pascal
Grimault, Nicolas
Truy, Eric
Tillmann, Barbara
Caclin, Anne
author_sort Pralus, Agathe
collection PubMed
description In the case of hearing loss, cochlear implants (CI) allow for the restoration of hearing. Despite the advantages of CIs for speech perception, CI users still complain about their poor perception of their auditory environment. Aiming to assess non-verbal auditory perception in CI users, we developed five listening tests. These tests measure pitch change detection, pitch direction identification, pitch short-term memory, auditory stream segregation, and emotional prosody recognition, along with perceived intensity ratings. In order to test the potential benefit of visual cues for pitch processing, the three pitch tests included half of the trials with visual indications to perform the task. We tested 10 normal-hearing (NH) participants with material being presented as original and vocoded sounds, and 10 post-lingually deaf CI users. With the vocoded sounds, the NH participants had reduced scores for the detection of small pitch differences, and reduced emotion recognition and streaming abilities compared to the original sounds. Similarly, the CI users had deficits for small differences in the pitch change detection task and emotion recognition, as well as a decreased streaming capacity. Overall, this assessment allows for the rapid detection of specific patterns of non-verbal auditory perception deficits. The current findings also open new perspectives about how to enhance pitch perception capacities using visual cues.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8152499
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81524992021-05-27 Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users Pralus, Agathe Hermann, Ruben Cholvy, Fanny Aguera, Pierre-Emmanuel Moulin, Annie Barone, Pascal Grimault, Nicolas Truy, Eric Tillmann, Barbara Caclin, Anne J Clin Med Article In the case of hearing loss, cochlear implants (CI) allow for the restoration of hearing. Despite the advantages of CIs for speech perception, CI users still complain about their poor perception of their auditory environment. Aiming to assess non-verbal auditory perception in CI users, we developed five listening tests. These tests measure pitch change detection, pitch direction identification, pitch short-term memory, auditory stream segregation, and emotional prosody recognition, along with perceived intensity ratings. In order to test the potential benefit of visual cues for pitch processing, the three pitch tests included half of the trials with visual indications to perform the task. We tested 10 normal-hearing (NH) participants with material being presented as original and vocoded sounds, and 10 post-lingually deaf CI users. With the vocoded sounds, the NH participants had reduced scores for the detection of small pitch differences, and reduced emotion recognition and streaming abilities compared to the original sounds. Similarly, the CI users had deficits for small differences in the pitch change detection task and emotion recognition, as well as a decreased streaming capacity. Overall, this assessment allows for the rapid detection of specific patterns of non-verbal auditory perception deficits. The current findings also open new perspectives about how to enhance pitch perception capacities using visual cues. MDPI 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8152499/ /pubmed/34068067 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102093 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Pralus, Agathe
Hermann, Ruben
Cholvy, Fanny
Aguera, Pierre-Emmanuel
Moulin, Annie
Barone, Pascal
Grimault, Nicolas
Truy, Eric
Tillmann, Barbara
Caclin, Anne
Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users
title Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users
title_full Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users
title_fullStr Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users
title_full_unstemmed Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users
title_short Rapid Assessment of Non-Verbal Auditory Perception in Normal-Hearing Participants and Cochlear Implant Users
title_sort rapid assessment of non-verbal auditory perception in normal-hearing participants and cochlear implant users
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8152499/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068067
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/jcm10102093
work_keys_str_mv AT pralusagathe rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT hermannruben rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT cholvyfanny rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT aguerapierreemmanuel rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT moulinannie rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT baronepascal rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT grimaultnicolas rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT truyeric rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT tillmannbarbara rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers
AT caclinanne rapidassessmentofnonverbalauditoryperceptioninnormalhearingparticipantsandcochlearimplantusers