Cargando…

A Comparative Study on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Profile of White and Red Wines Elaborated Using Bee Pollen versus Commercial Activators

Lack of nutrients in grape may cause problems for a proper alcoholic fermentation process, resulting in an altered aromatic profile of the wines. To avoid this situation, commercial winemakers often use fermentation activators, which are usually combinations of ammonium salts, inactivated yeast and...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Amores-Arrocha, Antonio, Sancho-Galán, Pau, Jiménez-Cantizano, Ana, Palacios, Víctor
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: MDPI 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8153345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068360
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10051082
_version_ 1783698780983394304
author Amores-Arrocha, Antonio
Sancho-Galán, Pau
Jiménez-Cantizano, Ana
Palacios, Víctor
author_facet Amores-Arrocha, Antonio
Sancho-Galán, Pau
Jiménez-Cantizano, Ana
Palacios, Víctor
author_sort Amores-Arrocha, Antonio
collection PubMed
description Lack of nutrients in grape may cause problems for a proper alcoholic fermentation process, resulting in an altered aromatic profile of the wines. To avoid this situation, commercial winemakers often use fermentation activators, which are usually combinations of ammonium salts, inactivated yeast and thiamine. In addition, it has been shown that bee pollen addition to the grape can help to improve fermentation, resulting in better volatile compound profile of wines responsible for sensory quality. For this reason, the aim of this research work was to carry out a comparative study using bee pollen versus commercial fermentation activators in white and red winemaking. The same dose of bee pollen and commercial activators (0.25 g/L) were used in all experiments. Volatile compounds were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, odor activity values were determined to assess odorant impact of various volatile compound families, and finally a descriptive sensory analysis was carried out. Then, the triangular test and the ranking assay were used to identify perceptible differences as well as preference among the wines elaborated. Compared to commercial activators, bee pollen wines increased volatile compound formation, mainly higher alcohols, esters, and terpenes, enhancing fruity and floral odorant series. On the other hand, triangular test showed significant differences between wines, and the ranking assay showed a greater preference for bee pollen wines.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8153345
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher MDPI
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81533452021-05-27 A Comparative Study on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Profile of White and Red Wines Elaborated Using Bee Pollen versus Commercial Activators Amores-Arrocha, Antonio Sancho-Galán, Pau Jiménez-Cantizano, Ana Palacios, Víctor Foods Article Lack of nutrients in grape may cause problems for a proper alcoholic fermentation process, resulting in an altered aromatic profile of the wines. To avoid this situation, commercial winemakers often use fermentation activators, which are usually combinations of ammonium salts, inactivated yeast and thiamine. In addition, it has been shown that bee pollen addition to the grape can help to improve fermentation, resulting in better volatile compound profile of wines responsible for sensory quality. For this reason, the aim of this research work was to carry out a comparative study using bee pollen versus commercial fermentation activators in white and red winemaking. The same dose of bee pollen and commercial activators (0.25 g/L) were used in all experiments. Volatile compounds were analyzed by gas chromatography–mass spectrometry, odor activity values were determined to assess odorant impact of various volatile compound families, and finally a descriptive sensory analysis was carried out. Then, the triangular test and the ranking assay were used to identify perceptible differences as well as preference among the wines elaborated. Compared to commercial activators, bee pollen wines increased volatile compound formation, mainly higher alcohols, esters, and terpenes, enhancing fruity and floral odorant series. On the other hand, triangular test showed significant differences between wines, and the ranking assay showed a greater preference for bee pollen wines. MDPI 2021-05-13 /pmc/articles/PMC8153345/ /pubmed/34068360 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10051082 Text en © 2021 by the authors. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Amores-Arrocha, Antonio
Sancho-Galán, Pau
Jiménez-Cantizano, Ana
Palacios, Víctor
A Comparative Study on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Profile of White and Red Wines Elaborated Using Bee Pollen versus Commercial Activators
title A Comparative Study on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Profile of White and Red Wines Elaborated Using Bee Pollen versus Commercial Activators
title_full A Comparative Study on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Profile of White and Red Wines Elaborated Using Bee Pollen versus Commercial Activators
title_fullStr A Comparative Study on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Profile of White and Red Wines Elaborated Using Bee Pollen versus Commercial Activators
title_full_unstemmed A Comparative Study on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Profile of White and Red Wines Elaborated Using Bee Pollen versus Commercial Activators
title_short A Comparative Study on Volatile Compounds and Sensory Profile of White and Red Wines Elaborated Using Bee Pollen versus Commercial Activators
title_sort comparative study on volatile compounds and sensory profile of white and red wines elaborated using bee pollen versus commercial activators
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8153345/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34068360
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/foods10051082
work_keys_str_mv AT amoresarrochaantonio acomparativestudyonvolatilecompoundsandsensoryprofileofwhiteandredwineselaboratedusingbeepollenversuscommercialactivators
AT sanchogalanpau acomparativestudyonvolatilecompoundsandsensoryprofileofwhiteandredwineselaboratedusingbeepollenversuscommercialactivators
AT jimenezcantizanoana acomparativestudyonvolatilecompoundsandsensoryprofileofwhiteandredwineselaboratedusingbeepollenversuscommercialactivators
AT palaciosvictor acomparativestudyonvolatilecompoundsandsensoryprofileofwhiteandredwineselaboratedusingbeepollenversuscommercialactivators
AT amoresarrochaantonio comparativestudyonvolatilecompoundsandsensoryprofileofwhiteandredwineselaboratedusingbeepollenversuscommercialactivators
AT sanchogalanpau comparativestudyonvolatilecompoundsandsensoryprofileofwhiteandredwineselaboratedusingbeepollenversuscommercialactivators
AT jimenezcantizanoana comparativestudyonvolatilecompoundsandsensoryprofileofwhiteandredwineselaboratedusingbeepollenversuscommercialactivators
AT palaciosvictor comparativestudyonvolatilecompoundsandsensoryprofileofwhiteandredwineselaboratedusingbeepollenversuscommercialactivators