Cargando…

Dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? A randomised controlled study

OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate response of nursing home residents to dog visits with or without an activity, and the impact of cognitive ability. METHODS: In a randomly controlled trial, 174 nursing home residents were allocated to 12 bi-weekly 10-minute visits: either ordinary dog visits (D, n...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thodberg, Karen, Videbech, Poul B., Hansen, Tia G. B., Pedersen, Anne Bak, Christensen, Janne W.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8153477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34038451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251571
_version_ 1783698807278534656
author Thodberg, Karen
Videbech, Poul B.
Hansen, Tia G. B.
Pedersen, Anne Bak
Christensen, Janne W.
author_facet Thodberg, Karen
Videbech, Poul B.
Hansen, Tia G. B.
Pedersen, Anne Bak
Christensen, Janne W.
author_sort Thodberg, Karen
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate response of nursing home residents to dog visits with or without an activity, and the impact of cognitive ability. METHODS: In a randomly controlled trial, 174 nursing home residents were allocated to 12 bi-weekly 10-minute visits: either ordinary dog visits (D, n = 57, 49 analysed), dog visits with an activity (DA, n = 56, 48 analysed), or visits with activity but no dog (A, n = 61, 54 analysed). We recorded frequency and duration of residents’ verbal and physical interactions with the dog and persons. Data were analysed in three periods of four visits (period 1–3) as binomial variables (generalised linear models) or durations (non-parametric statistics). RESULTS: Both visit type and impairment level affected the likelihood of interacting with the dog (D and DA). In some periods increased cognitive impairment lowered odds of touching the dog in DA visits (period 1: F(1,85) = 5.17, P < 0.05) and talking to it directly (period 1: F(1,90) = 4.60, P < 0.05; period 3: F(1,87) = 5.34, P < 0.05). Throughout, residents talked less to persons during DA visits compared to D and A (P = 0.01–0.05), and level of cognitive impairment correlated negatively with talk duration (P < 0.001). Generally, high cognitive impairment level lowered odds of interacting with (period 1: F(1,89) = 7.89, P < 0.01; period 2: F(1,97) = 6.76, P = 0.01; period 3: F(1,92) = 13.57, P < 0.001) and talking about the activities (period 1: F(1,89) = 13.78, P <0.001; period 2: F(1,88) = 3.27, P = 0.07; period 3: F(1,86) = 3.88, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Visits without specific activities stimulated residents to interact with the dog, whereas increasing the complexity of dog visits by adding activities resulted in less interaction with the dog for severely impaired residents. The optimal dog visit for the less cognitively impaired residents could include activities and thereby a possibility to interact with the dog in different ways, whereas for severely impaired residents, just being with the dog seems more appropriate.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8153477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81534772021-06-09 Dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? A randomised controlled study Thodberg, Karen Videbech, Poul B. Hansen, Tia G. B. Pedersen, Anne Bak Christensen, Janne W. PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To compare the immediate response of nursing home residents to dog visits with or without an activity, and the impact of cognitive ability. METHODS: In a randomly controlled trial, 174 nursing home residents were allocated to 12 bi-weekly 10-minute visits: either ordinary dog visits (D, n = 57, 49 analysed), dog visits with an activity (DA, n = 56, 48 analysed), or visits with activity but no dog (A, n = 61, 54 analysed). We recorded frequency and duration of residents’ verbal and physical interactions with the dog and persons. Data were analysed in three periods of four visits (period 1–3) as binomial variables (generalised linear models) or durations (non-parametric statistics). RESULTS: Both visit type and impairment level affected the likelihood of interacting with the dog (D and DA). In some periods increased cognitive impairment lowered odds of touching the dog in DA visits (period 1: F(1,85) = 5.17, P < 0.05) and talking to it directly (period 1: F(1,90) = 4.60, P < 0.05; period 3: F(1,87) = 5.34, P < 0.05). Throughout, residents talked less to persons during DA visits compared to D and A (P = 0.01–0.05), and level of cognitive impairment correlated negatively with talk duration (P < 0.001). Generally, high cognitive impairment level lowered odds of interacting with (period 1: F(1,89) = 7.89, P < 0.01; period 2: F(1,97) = 6.76, P = 0.01; period 3: F(1,92) = 13.57, P < 0.001) and talking about the activities (period 1: F(1,89) = 13.78, P <0.001; period 2: F(1,88) = 3.27, P = 0.07; period 3: F(1,86) = 3.88, P = 0.05). CONCLUSION: Visits without specific activities stimulated residents to interact with the dog, whereas increasing the complexity of dog visits by adding activities resulted in less interaction with the dog for severely impaired residents. The optimal dog visit for the less cognitively impaired residents could include activities and thereby a possibility to interact with the dog in different ways, whereas for severely impaired residents, just being with the dog seems more appropriate. Public Library of Science 2021-05-26 /pmc/articles/PMC8153477/ /pubmed/34038451 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251571 Text en © 2021 Thodberg et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Thodberg, Karen
Videbech, Poul B.
Hansen, Tia G. B.
Pedersen, Anne Bak
Christensen, Janne W.
Dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? A randomised controlled study
title Dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? A randomised controlled study
title_full Dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? A randomised controlled study
title_fullStr Dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? A randomised controlled study
title_full_unstemmed Dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? A randomised controlled study
title_short Dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? A randomised controlled study
title_sort dog visits in nursing homes – increase complexity or keep it simple? a randomised controlled study
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8153477/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34038451
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0251571
work_keys_str_mv AT thodbergkaren dogvisitsinnursinghomesincreasecomplexityorkeepitsimplearandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT videbechpoulb dogvisitsinnursinghomesincreasecomplexityorkeepitsimplearandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT hansentiagb dogvisitsinnursinghomesincreasecomplexityorkeepitsimplearandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT pedersenannebak dogvisitsinnursinghomesincreasecomplexityorkeepitsimplearandomisedcontrolledstudy
AT christensenjannew dogvisitsinnursinghomesincreasecomplexityorkeepitsimplearandomisedcontrolledstudy