Cargando…

Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania

BACKGROUND: Clinical trial participants are required to sign an informed consent form (ICF). However, information is lacking on the most effective methods to convey trial relevant information prior to inviting participants to sign the ICF, being particularly pertinent in low-income countries. A prev...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Palmeirim, Marta S., Mohammed, Ulfat A., Ross, Amanda, Ame, Shaali M., Ali, Said M, Keiser, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8153490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33989324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009409
_version_ 1783698810383368192
author Palmeirim, Marta S.
Mohammed, Ulfat A.
Ross, Amanda
Ame, Shaali M.
Ali, Said M
Keiser, Jennifer
author_facet Palmeirim, Marta S.
Mohammed, Ulfat A.
Ross, Amanda
Ame, Shaali M.
Ali, Said M
Keiser, Jennifer
author_sort Palmeirim, Marta S.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Clinical trial participants are required to sign an informed consent form (ICF). However, information is lacking on the most effective methods to convey trial relevant information prior to inviting participants to sign the ICF, being particularly pertinent in low-income countries. A previous study on Pemba Island, Tanzania, found that a verbal information session (IS) was significantly better than providing an ICF alone. However, knowledge gaps remained. Building on these findings, we investigated the effect of adding a slideshow or a theater to the IS in the informed consent procedure of an anthelminthic clinical trial. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 604 caregivers were randomized into the control group that only received an ICF (n = 150) or an ICF plus one of three intervention strategies: (i) verbal IS (n = 135), (ii) verbal IS with a slideshow (n = 174) or (iii) verbal IS followed by a theater (n = 145). All modes of information covered the same key messages. Participants’ understanding was assessed using a semi-structured questionnaire. The mean score of caregivers in the control group (ICF only) was 4.41 (standard deviation = 1.47). Caregivers attending the IS alone were more knowledgeable than those in the control group (estimated difference in mean scores: 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95 to 2.86, p < 0.01). However, there was no evidence of an improvement compared to the IS only when participants attended a slideshow (0.09, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.35, p = 0.68) or a theater (0.28, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.82, p = 0.32). Three out of 10 key messages remained largely misunderstood, regardless of the mode of information group. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study confirmed that, in this setting, an ICF alone was not sufficient to convey clinical trial-related information. An IS was beneficial, however, additional theater and slideshows did not further improve understanding. Future research should explore methods to improve communication between study teams and participants for different key messages, study types and settings.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8153490
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81534902021-06-09 Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania Palmeirim, Marta S. Mohammed, Ulfat A. Ross, Amanda Ame, Shaali M. Ali, Said M Keiser, Jennifer PLoS Negl Trop Dis Research Article BACKGROUND: Clinical trial participants are required to sign an informed consent form (ICF). However, information is lacking on the most effective methods to convey trial relevant information prior to inviting participants to sign the ICF, being particularly pertinent in low-income countries. A previous study on Pemba Island, Tanzania, found that a verbal information session (IS) was significantly better than providing an ICF alone. However, knowledge gaps remained. Building on these findings, we investigated the effect of adding a slideshow or a theater to the IS in the informed consent procedure of an anthelminthic clinical trial. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: A total of 604 caregivers were randomized into the control group that only received an ICF (n = 150) or an ICF plus one of three intervention strategies: (i) verbal IS (n = 135), (ii) verbal IS with a slideshow (n = 174) or (iii) verbal IS followed by a theater (n = 145). All modes of information covered the same key messages. Participants’ understanding was assessed using a semi-structured questionnaire. The mean score of caregivers in the control group (ICF only) was 4.41 (standard deviation = 1.47). Caregivers attending the IS alone were more knowledgeable than those in the control group (estimated difference in mean scores: 2.40, 95% confidence interval (CI) 1.95 to 2.86, p < 0.01). However, there was no evidence of an improvement compared to the IS only when participants attended a slideshow (0.09, 95% CI -0.53 to 0.35, p = 0.68) or a theater (0.28, 95% CI -0.27 to 0.82, p = 0.32). Three out of 10 key messages remained largely misunderstood, regardless of the mode of information group. CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: Our study confirmed that, in this setting, an ICF alone was not sufficient to convey clinical trial-related information. An IS was beneficial, however, additional theater and slideshows did not further improve understanding. Future research should explore methods to improve communication between study teams and participants for different key messages, study types and settings. Public Library of Science 2021-05-14 /pmc/articles/PMC8153490/ /pubmed/33989324 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009409 Text en © 2021 Palmeirim et al https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Palmeirim, Marta S.
Mohammed, Ulfat A.
Ross, Amanda
Ame, Shaali M.
Ali, Said M
Keiser, Jennifer
Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania
title Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania
title_full Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania
title_fullStr Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania
title_short Evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on Pemba Island, Tanzania
title_sort evaluation of two communication tools, slideshow and theater, to improve participants’ understanding of a clinical trial in the informed consent procedure on pemba island, tanzania
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8153490/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33989324
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pntd.0009409
work_keys_str_mv AT palmeirimmartas evaluationoftwocommunicationtoolsslideshowandtheatertoimproveparticipantsunderstandingofaclinicaltrialintheinformedconsentprocedureonpembaislandtanzania
AT mohammedulfata evaluationoftwocommunicationtoolsslideshowandtheatertoimproveparticipantsunderstandingofaclinicaltrialintheinformedconsentprocedureonpembaislandtanzania
AT rossamanda evaluationoftwocommunicationtoolsslideshowandtheatertoimproveparticipantsunderstandingofaclinicaltrialintheinformedconsentprocedureonpembaislandtanzania
AT ameshaalim evaluationoftwocommunicationtoolsslideshowandtheatertoimproveparticipantsunderstandingofaclinicaltrialintheinformedconsentprocedureonpembaislandtanzania
AT alisaidm evaluationoftwocommunicationtoolsslideshowandtheatertoimproveparticipantsunderstandingofaclinicaltrialintheinformedconsentprocedureonpembaislandtanzania
AT keiserjennifer evaluationoftwocommunicationtoolsslideshowandtheatertoimproveparticipantsunderstandingofaclinicaltrialintheinformedconsentprocedureonpembaislandtanzania