Cargando…

Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration

[Image: see text] In ligand-based drug design, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models play an important role in activity prediction. One of the major end points of QSAR models is half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)). Experimental IC(50) data from various research groups...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Matsumoto, Katsuhisa, Miyao, Tomoyuki, Funatsu, Kimito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: American Chemical Society 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00463
_version_ 1783698924190564352
author Matsumoto, Katsuhisa
Miyao, Tomoyuki
Funatsu, Kimito
author_facet Matsumoto, Katsuhisa
Miyao, Tomoyuki
Funatsu, Kimito
author_sort Matsumoto, Katsuhisa
collection PubMed
description [Image: see text] In ligand-based drug design, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models play an important role in activity prediction. One of the major end points of QSAR models is half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)). Experimental IC(50) data from various research groups have been accumulated in publicly accessible databases, providing an opportunity for us to use such data in predictive QSAR models. In this study, we focused on using a ranking-oriented QSAR model as a predictive model because relative potency strength within the same assay is solid information that is not based on any mechanical assumptions. We conducted rigorous validation using the ChEMBL database and previously reported data sets. Ranking support vector machine (ranking-SVM) models trained on compounds from similar assays were as good as support vector regression (SVR) with the Tanimoto kernel trained on compounds from all the assays. As effective ways of data integration, for ranking-SVM, integrated compounds should be selected from only similar assays in terms of compounds. For SVR with the Tanimoto kernel, entire compounds from different assays can be incorporated.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-8154010
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher American Chemical Society
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-81540102021-05-27 Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration Matsumoto, Katsuhisa Miyao, Tomoyuki Funatsu, Kimito ACS Omega [Image: see text] In ligand-based drug design, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models play an important role in activity prediction. One of the major end points of QSAR models is half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)). Experimental IC(50) data from various research groups have been accumulated in publicly accessible databases, providing an opportunity for us to use such data in predictive QSAR models. In this study, we focused on using a ranking-oriented QSAR model as a predictive model because relative potency strength within the same assay is solid information that is not based on any mechanical assumptions. We conducted rigorous validation using the ChEMBL database and previously reported data sets. Ranking support vector machine (ranking-SVM) models trained on compounds from similar assays were as good as support vector regression (SVR) with the Tanimoto kernel trained on compounds from all the assays. As effective ways of data integration, for ranking-SVM, integrated compounds should be selected from only similar assays in terms of compounds. For SVR with the Tanimoto kernel, entire compounds from different assays can be incorporated. American Chemical Society 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8154010/ /pubmed/34056351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00463 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Matsumoto, Katsuhisa
Miyao, Tomoyuki
Funatsu, Kimito
Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration
title Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration
title_full Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration
title_fullStr Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration
title_full_unstemmed Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration
title_short Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration
title_sort ranking-oriented quantitative structure–activity relationship modeling combined with assay-wise data integration
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154010/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056351
http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00463
work_keys_str_mv AT matsumotokatsuhisa rankingorientedquantitativestructureactivityrelationshipmodelingcombinedwithassaywisedataintegration
AT miyaotomoyuki rankingorientedquantitativestructureactivityrelationshipmodelingcombinedwithassaywisedataintegration
AT funatsukimito rankingorientedquantitativestructureactivityrelationshipmodelingcombinedwithassaywisedataintegration