Cargando…
Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration
[Image: see text] In ligand-based drug design, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models play an important role in activity prediction. One of the major end points of QSAR models is half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)). Experimental IC(50) data from various research groups...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
American Chemical Society
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00463 |
_version_ | 1783698924190564352 |
---|---|
author | Matsumoto, Katsuhisa Miyao, Tomoyuki Funatsu, Kimito |
author_facet | Matsumoto, Katsuhisa Miyao, Tomoyuki Funatsu, Kimito |
author_sort | Matsumoto, Katsuhisa |
collection | PubMed |
description | [Image: see text] In ligand-based drug design, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models play an important role in activity prediction. One of the major end points of QSAR models is half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)). Experimental IC(50) data from various research groups have been accumulated in publicly accessible databases, providing an opportunity for us to use such data in predictive QSAR models. In this study, we focused on using a ranking-oriented QSAR model as a predictive model because relative potency strength within the same assay is solid information that is not based on any mechanical assumptions. We conducted rigorous validation using the ChEMBL database and previously reported data sets. Ranking support vector machine (ranking-SVM) models trained on compounds from similar assays were as good as support vector regression (SVR) with the Tanimoto kernel trained on compounds from all the assays. As effective ways of data integration, for ranking-SVM, integrated compounds should be selected from only similar assays in terms of compounds. For SVR with the Tanimoto kernel, entire compounds from different assays can be incorporated. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-8154010 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | American Chemical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-81540102021-05-27 Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration Matsumoto, Katsuhisa Miyao, Tomoyuki Funatsu, Kimito ACS Omega [Image: see text] In ligand-based drug design, quantitative structure–activity relationship (QSAR) models play an important role in activity prediction. One of the major end points of QSAR models is half-maximal inhibitory concentration (IC(50)). Experimental IC(50) data from various research groups have been accumulated in publicly accessible databases, providing an opportunity for us to use such data in predictive QSAR models. In this study, we focused on using a ranking-oriented QSAR model as a predictive model because relative potency strength within the same assay is solid information that is not based on any mechanical assumptions. We conducted rigorous validation using the ChEMBL database and previously reported data sets. Ranking support vector machine (ranking-SVM) models trained on compounds from similar assays were as good as support vector regression (SVR) with the Tanimoto kernel trained on compounds from all the assays. As effective ways of data integration, for ranking-SVM, integrated compounds should be selected from only similar assays in terms of compounds. For SVR with the Tanimoto kernel, entire compounds from different assays can be incorporated. American Chemical Society 2021-04-28 /pmc/articles/PMC8154010/ /pubmed/34056351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00463 Text en © 2021 The Authors. Published by American Chemical Society Permits non-commercial access and re-use, provided that author attribution and integrity are maintained; but does not permit creation of adaptations or other derivative works (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Matsumoto, Katsuhisa Miyao, Tomoyuki Funatsu, Kimito Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration |
title | Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity
Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration |
title_full | Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity
Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration |
title_fullStr | Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity
Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration |
title_full_unstemmed | Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity
Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration |
title_short | Ranking-Oriented Quantitative Structure–Activity
Relationship Modeling Combined with Assay-Wise Data Integration |
title_sort | ranking-oriented quantitative structure–activity
relationship modeling combined with assay-wise data integration |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154010/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34056351 http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/acsomega.1c00463 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT matsumotokatsuhisa rankingorientedquantitativestructureactivityrelationshipmodelingcombinedwithassaywisedataintegration AT miyaotomoyuki rankingorientedquantitativestructureactivityrelationshipmodelingcombinedwithassaywisedataintegration AT funatsukimito rankingorientedquantitativestructureactivityrelationshipmodelingcombinedwithassaywisedataintegration |