Cargando…

A physiotherapy triage service for orthopaedic upper limb service: an effective way to reduce clinic visits and identify patients for operative intervention

INTRODUCTION: Waiting times for orthopaedic outpatient clinics are steadily increasing over the past number of years worldwide. Physiotherapy triage clinics are being utilised to improve access for patients with non-urgent or routine musculoskeletal disorders, to be seen in a timely manner in specia...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lyons, Rebecca F., Cassells, Mary, Hynes, Darragh, Mullett, Hannan, Groarke, Patrick J.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2021
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC8154104/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/34041692
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11845-021-02606-2
Descripción
Sumario:INTRODUCTION: Waiting times for orthopaedic outpatient clinics are steadily increasing over the past number of years worldwide. Physiotherapy triage clinics are being utilised to improve access for patients with non-urgent or routine musculoskeletal disorders, to be seen in a timely manner in specialised out-patient clinics. Using these clinics, the aim is to ultimately stratify patients into appropriate management pathways. The aim of our study is to review the effectiveness of a physiotherapy triage clinic run by advanced practitioner physiotherapists (APP), who specialise in the review of upper limb referrals from primary care physicians. METHODS: For this study, a prospective, observational design was used. Patients were referred to the Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Upper Limb Service at a national elective Orthopaedic Unit. The patients’ referrals were reviewed and allocated to a physiotherapy triage pathway if deemed routine, non-urgent cases. After assessment in the APP clinic, the physiotherapist made recommendations and highlighted patients who required review or case discussion with an orthopaedic surgeon. The discharge rate and outcome of patients referred on for further interventions or operative procedures was followed over a 3-year period. The outcomes for the patients were reviewed, including whether patients who met an orthopaedic surgeon went on to have surgical intervention. RESULTS: During the study, 646 patients were reviewed in an upper limb APP physiotherapy triage clinic. Of those reviewed, only 201 patients required review by an orthopaedic surgeon. Of those, 56 patients were scheduled for an operative procedure. Within the 3-year period, 50 patients of those scheduled underwent the procedure. The most commonly performed procedure being an arthroscopic subacromial decompression with or without acromioplasty or rotator cuff repair. A total of 145 patients referred by the physiotherapist had a shoulder injection including subacromial and glenohumeral intra-articular injection. The initial discharge rate was 68%. CONCLUSIONS: There is a high initial discharge rate after initial assessment by APP triage clinics for upper limb musculoskeletal pathology. This is beneficial in alleviating waiting list pressures allowing only those patients in need of intervention to be placed on the ever expanding waiting lists to see orthopaedic surgeons. This study shows a high proportion of patients being offered surgical intervention after being referred by the APP. We conclude from this that the agreement between the physiotherapist’s initial diagnosis and that of the consultant surgeon being similar in identifying patients who would benefit from operative intervention.